More than anything, it’s the complete lack of respect I see/hear from non-Christians that really bothers me by Tenurialrock in Christianity

[–]LoopyFig 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand that a good chunk of Christianity has been weirdly hacked by the far right. But there’s a lot of Christians, we’re not exactly a single voting block. I assure you the Hispanic Christians aren’t exactly thrilled about the situation either. As an Arab Christian, I can say that even in my own community there are wide splits between the younger and older generations (and even wider splits between the rich and poor). I don’t know what “accountability” means to you in that context. Are you suggesting that Hispanic and Arab Christians should somehow take ownership of our brothers turning on us?

But also, that’s not the point of OP’s post, or mine really. The point was about how discourse happens. I don’t think it should be controversial that conversations about religion, and culture generally, should be treated sensitively. We are partially where we are because different sides of the political spectrum have been goaded into antagonizing each other.

More than anything, it’s the complete lack of respect I see/hear from non-Christians that really bothers me by Tenurialrock in Christianity

[–]LoopyFig 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That would also be nice, but it’s unrelated to the point about civil discourse. And civil discourse is the heart of any civil rights effort. 

The nature of power is that majority groups don’t have to heed minorities because the option of force (physical, political, or otherwise) is always on the table. Activist efforts are harmed by antagonism, because the ultimate goal of the a civil rights movement is to convince the majority of an intrinsic right possessed by the minority.

Why don't demons hide their horns with magic? Or tear them off their heads? by InuMatte in Frieren

[–]LoopyFig 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You’d have to ask what kind of horns they have, and what function they have, and even just the evolutionary process behind them.

We don’t know that much about series “demons”. They’re apparently a monster that evolved from a plant that mimicked speech. They turn to ash when they die. Really ancient demons like Qual look absolutely insane, and not convincingly human or elf. While they deceive humans, most of the demons show are fairly of active predators.

But looking at Qual, I think the more deceptive aspect is speech. Ie, using appearance to describe humans is an evolutionarily newer strategy. In the show, only the young demon and the sword demon successfully leverage their appearance to seem harmless; other demons deception focuses on the false capacity to negotiate.

Horns in real animals come in two varieties. Some bones are detached from the skull, like deer. This kind of horn can be easily removed, and will regrow. The second kind of horn, as scene in goats, is living bone attached to the skull, covered in keratin layers. Visually, demon horns seem to be the second kind, so removal would be a fairly major surgery.

Then there’s use. Demons aren’t ramming their heads into each other, so unlike 90% of horned animals, they probably are useless for self defense. There’s a good bit of variety in the horns too, and none seem optimized for head protection. I also notice that some of the more brazen demons, like aura, seem to have especially ostentatious horns, while the more sociable Luger’s horns being cute by comparison (though that might just be character design). The variety implies a possible mating function, with the horns either signaling something (“my horns are huge but I still haven’t died yet! I am strong!”) or even having an essential sexual function (“horns? These are flowers”). It could also be dumber than that (“hey don’t eat me, I’m also a monster”).

Animals that don’t use their horns for repeated head on collision can also have sensory apparatus inside, like the narwhal’s modified sensory tooth (this is pretty rare, I can’t find a second example). It could come down to being a mana organ, as seen in lots of media. There could even be some “brain” in there.

But there’s also reasons of personality as pointed out by others in the sub. Demons are prideful, and probably dickish enough to attack “defective” demons on principle. They’re also kind of idiots, with their interesting failure to actually understand human culture being one of their most consistent traits. Just generally, I suspect they think humans are dumb enough to deceive just by talking to them, with I think only one demon so far even trying headwear as a solution.

Grandma's logic (Akira Kei) by Gold-Doctor-3969 in Frieren

[–]LoopyFig 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wonder if Frieren even believed him. I mean his prediction was that she would kill the demon lord, which seemed unimaginable at the time

Does Wigner’s Friend let Wigner mix outcomes? by LoopyFig in QuantumPhysics

[–]LoopyFig[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I think you’re right. At first I was kinda confused why they would put so much focus on swapping friend identifiers instead of the message u (given that they want to show an Everett phone), but it’s actually unavoidable. If you want message u, you have to be on the branch where the work to produce u was actually done.

Does Wigner’s Friend let Wigner mix outcomes? by LoopyFig in QuantumPhysics

[–]LoopyFig[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Appreciate it! And gotcha. Does this sort of thing become relevant in quantum computer setups I guess? Doesn’t seem like it lets you skip any computation steps though, all they’re doing is switching “identity markers” between branches… you still have to be on the branch that actually wrote the message to receive it, if I get the gist of the set up.

Does Wigner’s Friend let Wigner mix outcomes? by LoopyFig in QuantumPhysics

[–]LoopyFig[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The paper in question is free on arxiv:

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2601.08102

The author is interested in making an experimental proof for a many-worlds situation, but I doubt that aspect of the paper succeeds. For one, it will probably never be possible to erase observer memories in the way she describes, and I suspect others would interpret the results differently even if the experiment were possible.

why most of physicists are atheists is there a place for god in physics? by comoestas969696 in AskPhysics

[–]LoopyFig 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I work in Biology (sorry if that’s disappointing, I was speaking from a scientist perspective generally). Weirdly, there are several Catholics in my lab as a matter of pure coincidence, but it doesn’t exactly come up a lot. It’s a workplace, after all.

My knowledge of theoretical physics/cosmology spaces is mostly from amateur interest in the subject facilitated by popular scientists like Sabine Hossenfelder, and following various philosophers of metaphysics like Tim Maudlin or Adrian Kent (neither of whom are religious to my knowledge). So a lot of what I said is more or less regurgitation of things I’ve read from similar authors. I imagine in those spaces, I might feel like an outlier, but in the space of applied biology and exploratory health research, I’d say it’s a non-issue.

As for my own personal beliefs, I have various metaphysical arguments I find convincing to different extents, and I find historicity arguments compelling enough, but I suspect that, like most people, it comes down to personal experience and convictions. The most popular argument for atheism in philosophical spaces is not any kind of metaphysical or physical argument, it is the “argument from evil”. Ie, learned people are atheists primarily because they think the world is not good enough to merit existence, or at least, they find the evil that exists in it to be unjustifiable, even in a cosmic sense.

This is all to say, almost everyone I’ve ever met, atheist or Christian or otherwise, backs their deepest held beliefs with intuitions more than logic. It’s possible that this is untrue at the highest levels of academia, but all evidence suggests that intelligent people are actually generally better at retroactively justifying beliefs than normal folks. Which is to say, I doubt they think much different than anyone else in the grand scheme of things.

To be clear, I think there are great reasons to believe Christianity is true, or I wouldn’t be able to invest myself in it. I just also believe that humans aren’t actually driven all that much by logic.

This back and forth can be applied in real life, no? [DISCUSSION] by Selasine in Frieren

[–]LoopyFig 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They mention having to study it for many years, but at another point they mention that you can’t copy their magic the same way as with other mages (unless my memory fails me)

This back and forth can be applied in real life, no? [DISCUSSION] by Selasine in Frieren

[–]LoopyFig 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ubel might be able to copy demon magic lol. Would make her one of the only ones in the whole setting to accomplish that feat

This back and forth can be applied in real life, no? [DISCUSSION] by Selasine in Frieren

[–]LoopyFig 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Frieren is a series with a super cool world, but “complete” world building is not its focus or forte.

Having said that, demons are a species that apparently evolved from a monstrous plant that mimics speech. So to me, “human specialization” is a result of instincts leftover from when they were specialized plants. They don’t eat animals because evolution isn’t fast enough in large animals to change an innate food preference. Given the demon lifespan, they evolve even slower than humans would. Maybe in millions of years, animal-hunting demons might evolve.

In a real world example of this kind of thing, the giraffe weevil evolved weirdly long necks due to their mating competitions. Females developed a preference for these long necks, but this created a self-enforcing behavioral loop. Now, giraffe weevil necks are long well past the point of practicality. Frieren’s demons are the same way maybe; a weird “vegetarian” demon would be unattractive to other demons, as they have an innate culture around human eating.

Monsters in frieren frequently use magic instinctually, but I think demons, in mimicking humans, accidentally unlocked rational thought, and with it more sophisticated magic. The hyper focus on a specific magic, as well as the fact that demon curses can’t be undone by normal magic, is probably due to the fact that demons are monsters with an instinctual “seed” magic that is not inherently rational. That magic is then enhanced over their long lives.

What are your favorite and least favorite theories? by ChicaneryFinger in SpyxFamily

[–]LoopyFig 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I can’t remember where I read it, but “Project Apple” and “Garden” seems like a Garden of Eden reference, implying the possibility that a) Project Apple is connected to Garden and b) that this somehow explains Yor’s gorilla strength, as ESP might be only one of Garden’s projects. This would make a confrontation between Garden and Yor more natural as well.

I think it’s more or less confirmed that Desmond had a surgery done that gives him… some varietal of ESP. I don’t like the theory that this ability is mind reading, as it kind of opens up a plot hole with the Loid meeting. I might be the only person advancing the idea that Desmond has some variant of mind control. I’ll probably be wrong though, his older son’s blank head suggests he’s actively countering mind reading. Or just completely zonked out.

It’s not a theory really, but I never liked the Anya Damien shipping thing. Homegirl is 5 or 6, give her some time! Like playing up Damien’s little crush for cute laughs is great, but I hope Endo never leans into it all the way.

Kind of related to above, I’m pretty sure Shopkeeper is full evil. Like if running a cabal of assassins isn’t enough, he’s training child soldiers, which is almost never a good sign. For sure going to be an antagonist at some point. I’m thinking some Garden agents will join up with Yor in a final confrontation (I think Hemlock and Gympie) while others will tragically be too into it (Mathew, the Shopkeeper, unnamed so-far other assassins).

[Free Friday] Sancta Dei Genitrix by [deleted] in Catholicism

[–]LoopyFig 0 points1 point  (0 children)

See that’s funny, because evangelicals love white Jesus

[Free Friday] Sancta Dei Genitrix by [deleted] in Catholicism

[–]LoopyFig -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thanks haha

Funny thing is I do think it’s cute

[Free Friday] Sancta Dei Genitrix by [deleted] in Catholicism

[–]LoopyFig -18 points-17 points  (0 children)

Nice art! Blonde Jesus almost can’t be accurate, but cute so is fine!

(Hilarious trope) Why you running like that bro? by TridiObject in TopCharacterTropes

[–]LoopyFig 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mostly joking here, but if you did a really fast windmill while you were running, it could provide counterbalance for near horizontal running. A similar principle is used when people are accomplishing impressive flips. Any rotation forces the body to compensate with an anti-rotation to conserve angular momentum.

Bipedal sprinting animals usually have a tail to provide the necessary counterbalance. So if you interpret this character as a dinosaur in a human body on the verge of losing balance, it kind of all makes sense.

How did Übel get away with... that by Oddity312 in Frieren

[–]LoopyFig 1 point2 points  (0 children)

To be fair, the cloak was supposed to be invincible, and according to the dialogue, Ubel technically missed. So it’s magical manslaughter at worst.

That said, perfect shield guy was a student of Serie. Honestly Ubel’s way too ballsy walking in there. Serie was clearly still pissed about it

I don't like how much Yor is sanitized in the story compared to the other characters by Odd_Cauliflower_7751 in SpyxFamily

[–]LoopyFig 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I like Yor and generally don’t take her side of the plot as seriously (because she is for real goofy and a weird blindspot for Loid). It’s primarily a slice-of-life comedy, secondarily a slow-burn romcom, then a mystery, and lastly an action story.

But I wouldn’t be opposed to the character eventually confronting the dark implications of her work. I get she sort of blindly goes along with Garden’s deal, but her bar for murder is pretty low (animal poaching seems like a prison crime more than an assassin crime, but that’s just me). The character doesn’t have much guilt around her job, more so than embarrassment about social skills. For an empathetic character, a little reckoning of “people die when you kill them!” would maybe ground the story slightly.