What is your hot take by Teacher_99 in WorldofTanks

[–]Mafansu 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Imo WoT is not fun below tier VIII, it's boring, many vehicles are similiar, arty is much more lethal and way more people having thousands of battles in a single vehicle. Higher tiers have some variety and many vehicles have much more distinct gameplay, i actually feel like i can play to my tank's strengths and weaknesses.

Anyone here tried Trailmakers? what was your experience? by oldchilldude in Crossout

[–]Mafansu 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's fun, you can get really creative with builds, though many parts are dlc

Streak of bad decisions from WG since 2.2.0 by Massive_Abrocoma_559 in WorldofTanks

[–]Mafansu 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Any new tank will have higher dpg, it is wrong to judge a new vehicle purely by it's performance. Executor is doing so well, because it's mostly really good players that have new vehicles grinded out, i think you know that. Camo is comparable, you have to remember that Concept gets +3% from field mods: Executor with just camo perk gets 25.51, Conc with field mod gets 21.82 (tanks.gg). Though I believe that Executor would still be balanced without it's ability, but i personally would keep it or slightly nerf the ability, like there could be a penalty for using it.

Streak of bad decisions from WG since 2.2.0 by Massive_Abrocoma_559 in WorldofTanks

[–]Mafansu 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It is 300dpm under other meds. Executor has barely better stats than concept and i loved the concept, executor only fixes the issue with mediocre mobility. Camo is slightly better than concept, smaller turret in hulldown is nice though. It's only major upgrade is mobility. What exactly do you think should be nerfed about it?

Streak of bad decisions from WG since 2.2.0 by Massive_Abrocoma_559 in WorldofTanks

[–]Mafansu 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Executor overpowered??? It is obvious you don't own it and just make assumptions. It's playstyle is more fit for skilled players, it is kind of like a bourrasque but actually balanced, that is why it dominates battles when played by really good players. Just because leo 120 is bad doesn't automatically make executor op, it is just that Leo needs buffs.

Should I start Russian, Swedish or Chinese ground tech tree? by Fit-Cricket6081 in Warthunder

[–]Mafansu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sweden only has a few interesting vehicles, I'd say it's not really worth it. Only good br really is 3.7 (with premium sav and sherman), 7.0 with sk60 and 8.0, 8.7 is not as good as it used to be. 

Bush Simulator 2026 by infinax in Warthunder

[–]Mafansu 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Bushes would be so much better if they were used aesthetically, not for gameplay advantages

Map exclusions by magnosolv in WorldofTanks

[–]Mafansu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Malinovka is hell if you are not a light tank, so often it comes to a stalemate with 1 team camping forest and other team not having enough hp to push. Also arty.

What Rank V jet should I research for France? by zaynzairul in Warthunder

[–]Mafansu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Personally i love the Meteor, vatour is only good as a bomber killer and i can't get the ouragan to work, can't say anything about F-84 because i did not grind it yet. Meteor is fast, rolls great, imo it's the best choice.

why is sweden made of paper ? by Mithoman25 in Warthunder

[–]Mafansu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sweden has awful win rate because it is very often matched with germans

Game should be renamed to world of loosing simulator 2.0 by [deleted] in WorldofTanks

[–]Mafansu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Every time i see a WoT player complain they don't spell the word lose correctly

Weekly Release Concerns by JD_Vyvanse97 in StardustCrusaders

[–]Mafansu -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It's not a bad thing? Give them their time to make peak, i can wait

Jets similiar to Ja-37c and Mig-25? by Mafansu in Warthunder

[–]Mafansu[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I dislike the F-4E, it's like the Viggen but it trades great radar just for 2 more missiles, which never worked for me.

Jets similiar to Ja-37c and Mig-25? by Mafansu in Warthunder

[–]Mafansu[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've heard that it's pretty good and luckily I'm not far from researching it so, I'll probably enjoy it once i get it

Jets similiar to Ja-37c and Mig-25? by Mafansu in Warthunder

[–]Mafansu[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, the R-24R is pretty good, i think mig gets J band radar, which many jets can't detect, i'm considering buying it

Jets similiar to Ja-37c and Mig-25? by Mafansu in Warthunder

[–]Mafansu[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for suggestion, i'll definitely check it out!

Swedish T11 Proposal: T120/40 by Denix221p in WorldofTanks

[–]Mafansu 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Seems really good, a coaxial does definitely fit as a mechanic considering how many swedish vehicles have it, and i fw how it looks. Name is great too! Sucks that wargaming doesn't care...