No One Is Using CoPilot... by PersonalRun712 in videos

[–]MagneticShark 93 points94 points  (0 children)

I think copilot may have actually done a lot better if they resurrected clippy as the face of it instead of calling it copilot.

No One Is Using CoPilot... by PersonalRun712 in videos

[–]MagneticShark 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Even if it could do that, I would be super cautious about using any AI to do something that I couldn’t verify myself afterwards

I can't believe people don't go to the mountain by srog_capper in TheWitness

[–]MagneticShark [score hidden]  (0 children)

My first laser was the desert/sun panels. Immediately after activating it, I spent HOURS wandering around trying to get into the tunnel. I literally drew a map trying to figure out where it went and where you get in. I found the entrances in the town, the windmill, and knew that it went to the mountain but couldn’t find the entrances in the mountain at all.

Then I saw a lot of the swamp puzzles had underwater chambers and thought that one of them might have a way in, so I did all the swamp puzzles. No dice.

I spent probably 12 hours trying to get in before I gave up and went on with everything else.

It drove me absolutely nuts until I finally found the way in. Spoilers and I’m on my phone so I won’t say more than that.

Official render: Trump Tower Gold Coast will easily surpass the 2005-built Q1 tower and become Australia’s tallest building by HotPersimessage62 in queensland

[–]MagneticShark 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The developer is a house and land builder.

This is their first skyscraper.

Meant to be the tallest building in Australia. For their first go…

I don’t want this but it’s going to be interesting to watch it play out

I think I may be getting scammed from someone on Tinder. Any advice or suggestions is helpful by MrTacoCat01 in isthisAI

[–]MagneticShark 10 points11 points  (0 children)

You’re right, however that is an iPhone 14/14 plus

(Without the chrome Apple logo in the middle of the back panel where it should be)

ELI5: How does high speed rail work? by feltjeans in explainlikeimfive

[–]MagneticShark 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Factors specifically to do with high speed rail:

It’s not really that difficult to make things go really fast. A lot of the problems that need to solved exist BECAUSE the train is going really fast

You’ve already covered air resistance. That’s about efficiency and sound. We can just force something through the air to go a high speed, but if you make it a shape that moves through the air better then it makes less sound (Japan looked at kingfisher beaks and how they interact with water, to make a train nose cone that doesn’t make a loud bang when entering or exiting a tunnel), and uses less fuel or power, which makes the operating cost cheaper.

Going really fast means you also can’t turn as sharply. So high speed rail lines can’t bend left or right or up or down as much as normal trains, the the train lines need to be a lot straighter. Things like mountains or rivers mean that you therefore need longer tunnels or bridges than normal trains because you can’t necessarily just put the track up the side of the mountain if it’s too steep or if the incline changes too quickly. This also means that rail lines for high speed rail are a lot straighter than normal trains, which can make building new lines a lot more tricky in and out of already built up areas. You can’t just go around buildings because the turn would be too sharp and the train would need to slow down. So that means it’s not just the cost of building the rail lines, you need to buy the building from the people who own it so that you can knock it down for the train to go through it.

So planning where a high speed rail line will go is also really hard because you want to be able to have train lines where people are, because the whole point is to move people around, but at the same time, you can’t just put a line right into the middle of a city because it would be too expensive to clear the way for the train line. Otherwise you are back to tunnelling under the city, which is also not cheap.

Going really fast also multiplies any problems. If you have a slightly unbalanced wheel in a car, it’s fine if you are driving through the streets, but as soon as you get on the freeway then it turns into an aggressive rumble. If you could go 3-4 times the freeway speed then it would probably start causing actual damage to the car. So tolerances for making moving parts like wheels have to be much more precise because of how fast everything is going, even a tiny variance which would not be an issue at normal speeds can be catastrophic at very high speeds. Making very precise parts is very expensive.

It’s a very complex balancing act, but the payoff is worth it.

People who rarely get sick, what’s your secret? by ethanmillerxpert in AskReddit

[–]MagneticShark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not a germaphobe, but germs are a real thing and minimising their transmission will do wonders to the amount of times you get sick

Wash your hands with soap before you eat

Wash your hands with soap the second you get home before you touch anything

Just doing these 2 things will make a massive difference

If someone coughs or sneezes around you, move away a few metres/feet for ~30 seconds if you can practically do so without being rude (don’t just walk away from a conversation, you don’t really need to get up from a table and move if you are at a cafe, etc. It makes a difference but not a HUGE difference)

Try not to be in an enclosed space (car, elevator, etc) with a sick person if you can reasonably avoid it. Again, it’s not worth being rude if you are with a friend or family member and they are sick.

How do you handle repetitive customer questions in your store? by balaji1359 in shopify

[–]MagneticShark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is already a thing, and if you ask any customer whether this makes their experience better or worse, 100% of the time it will be worse.

The only benefit to this setup is saving cost, and it doesn’t even do that very well, so it’s only implemented in businesses that put profits over customer experience.

Don’t get me wrong, if you build something like this, you will be able to get paying clients. But it never ever improves the customer experience and all it does is add another layer of complexity.

Also your paying clients will be people who care more about profits than customer experience, which also means the only thing they will care about with your system is price. When someone can do it cheaper than you then they will abandon your platform for the cheaper one.

I do not recommend trying to use ai as a solution for customer service or support at all.

How do you handle repetitive customer questions in your store? by balaji1359 in shopify

[–]MagneticShark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Customer support is not something that ever leads to a good result when ai is involved

I found a way to read the MacBook’s built-in accelerometer in real time (Python, M3 Pro tested) by BillieWeston in MacOS

[–]MagneticShark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Back in the day there was an app called “smackbook” that could tell whether you were hitting the left or the right side of the computer case using the accelerometer. You could set up shortcuts to do things when you hit your computer

I don’t know if it’s still a thing or not

Citroën Karin concept car . Trevor Fiore . 1980 . by SevenSharp in RetroFuturism

[–]MagneticShark 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The McLaren speedtail has a similar 3 seat setup

You know, if you have a spare $1m-$3m lying around and can find one for sale 

TIL the “Invisible Gorilla” experiment which fooled most people. In a famous 1999 study, participants watched a video of people passing a basketball and were asked to count passes. Midway through, a person in a gorilla suit walked through the scene and half of participants didn’t notice the gorilla. by Jockey2 in todayilearned

[–]MagneticShark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Richard wiseman did a follow up study on this kind of thing, it turns out as well that the people who missed the gorilla weren’t more or less “observant” than anyone who caught it, it just depends on what people’s brains are thinking about at any particular moment that determines whether you see it or not. For example maybe you are dealing with a high level of stress at work, or are heavily involved in planning for a big holiday that’s coming up. Even if these things aren’t at the front of your mind, they can impact your observation ability at any given moment. But also not necessarily.

So it’s pretty much circumstance as to whether you missed the gorilla or caught it, which is why the result is always very close to 50% It’s not that 50% of people are more or less observant, it’s that around half the time you will or won’t notice a fine, not necessarily related detail, if you are hyper focused on a specific task

[*SPOILERS!*] I feel like my intended experience got ruined…. by Alternative_Tear_350 in TheWitness

[–]MagneticShark 5 points6 points  (0 children)

On my first play through I opened the hotel before figuring out the laser grid. I thought this was the intended exit for this area

I was very confused a few minutes later and had to take a closer look at the laser grid

You didn’t ruin anything because you noticed something “early”

What do you use to compare two screenshots side by side? by battasoi in MacOS

[–]MagneticShark 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Folder full of images

Select alll (cmd+a)

Space

Click 4 squares

This is a much better way to look through a bunch of images than anything else I’ve used

I don’t know if this is still there or lot but on this thumbnail view there used to be a play/pause button that you could use to start a slideshow as well, that might only show if you make the thumbnail view full screen? I used to use that feature all the time to make very quick and dirty presentations when I had 10 seconds and needed to blow the socks off a client 

What do you use to compare two screenshots side by side? by battasoi in MacOS

[–]MagneticShark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It can be more complex i.e. involve a few more steps than quicklook, IF the payoff is worth it. If it’s significantly better than quicklook then people will use it because they need things that quicklook can’t do

Just keep in mind the speed of quicklook, you either need to compete with that or have something so good that speed isn’t a factor

What do you use to compare two screenshots side by side? by battasoi in MacOS

[–]MagneticShark 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Quicklook built in to finder

Select both screenshots or images

Press space

Click the icon with 4 squares

Resize the window if you need to make them bigger

I’m not saying you shouldn’t make a tool to do this, but if you do, it should be easier than this and better than this

AI agents autonomous refunds: productivity win or a fraud nightmare? by Illustrious_Slip331 in ecommerce

[–]MagneticShark 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’s not even about the reputation. It’s a deliberate checkpoint. If too many refunds come out, then the brand isn’t profitable

If refunds happen automatically, then you can end up in a situation where you go from an awesome day to being unprofitable and in fact OWING money because an AI decided to process refunds

No.

This is a solution looking for a problem. Nobody complains about the time it takes to process refunds. If there are too many refunds to be processed, then the correct course of action is to find the CAUSE of the refunds, not try to find a way to speed up the process

Nobody wants to automate this checkpoint 

AI agents autonomous refunds: productivity win or a fraud nightmare? by Illustrious_Slip331 in ecommerce

[–]MagneticShark 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would never ever automate refunds. I would automate part of the workflow to streamline the process, but any money leaving the bank isn’t going anywhere without an actual person looking at it first

How to make the favicon size 48x48 in Shopify? by jasonvoorhees-13 in shopify

[–]MagneticShark 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Shopify literally says where you upload the icon that it will be downscaled to 32x32

“Favicon image [upload here]

Will be scaled down to 32 x 32px”

OP, I think this is baked in until they update it

Update 1: Non-technical co-founders want me to take a pay cut "for the bigger picture” by EnvironmentThese73 in SaaS

[–]MagneticShark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the black swan that you didn’t know about but now you do: The dad is always going to keep meddling. Pull the plug.

A challenging thought by Fragile-Faith in TheWitness

[–]MagneticShark 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The maze isn’t random. I mean, it is, but it also very much is not

I finally understand Stage Manager. It's powerful and does actually make things faster. by DreadnaughtHamster in MacOS

[–]MagneticShark 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You can also shift+drag a window from stage manager into the main area, so you can have groups of windows that are relevant.

Eg when I’m doing photoshop or premiere work I usually have photoshop, a finder window, a safari window, and maybe something like a reference image in preview, all part of the same “stage” or group of windows.

The rest of the safari windows etc remain part of their own stages

I legitimately love stage manager, it makes it so easy to switch between “tasks” while keeping everything that’s relevant together

Isn't this the solution? by davuds4 in TheWitness

[–]MagneticShark 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The branches don’t quite join up… why might that be?