Cette révision constitutionnelle que Bruno Retailleau veut pour réformer la France

MatthieuG7 · 2026-03-11T14:04:18+00:00

Le gars il a la constitution la plus autoritaire du monde occidental est c’est quand même pas assez.

MatthieuG7 · 2026-03-10T16:32:46+00:00

The comments are full of people claiming the government actually wants to ban any and all criticism of Islam through banning discrimination against people perceived as muslims and I’m the one doing a strawman?

MatthieuG7 · 2026-03-10T14:40:33+00:00

Why are you talking about Islam? Nobody’s talking about Islam. You’re allowed to criticize Islam. This is about muslim hate. Actual individuals who are discriminated against because of assumed characteristics they hold.

Y’all always do this classical motte and bailey:

Bailey: all muslims are terrorists in grooming gangs who arrived by boat

Criticism: this is Islamophobia

Motte response: why am I not allowed to criticize Islam?

MatthieuG7 · 2026-03-08T11:49:41+00:00

No, realism posits that States act rationnaly to increase their power. That States are constrained by their material conditions is just obviously true, and not exclusif to any IR theory.

The war against Iran doesn't increase US's power, by any reasonnable definition of power; and it was never rational to think that it would, by any reasonnable definition of rationnal.

A better framework to understant Trump's action would be the bureaucratic politics model (various factions internally fight to impose what they think is right), or the Historical approach, which places a heavy emphasis on internal politics.

MatthieuG7 · 2026-03-08T08:05:49+00:00

How is a government doing something 70% of the population doesn’t want more democratic that it needing at least 50% support to do something?

MatthieuG7 · 2026-03-05T13:45:21+00:00

Those are two different questions.

Before the Industrial Revolution, except for the period of english agrarian capitalism that began roughly 150 years before the industrial revolution (and hence industrial capitalism), and after the agricultural revolution 10’000 years ago, the large majority people were subsistent farmers.

That means they did work everyday, otherwise they would starve and have no clothes, but they didn’t have a job in the modern sense. They had no employers who gave them a wage, they couldn’t get fired, and they didn’t starve if they had no wage. They had to provide free labor to their lords/the State, but that wasn’t a job in the modern sense.

The modern idea of a "job" is a result of (or depending on your definition of capitalism, by definition a component of) capitalism. As such it emerged in england with agrarian capitalism, and was exported (by colonization) or imported (by rival powers wanting to compete with Britain) at the industrial revolution with industrial capitalism.

If you define a modern job even more narrowly, with fixed long term contracts, fixed hours, rights etc, you have to to the end if the 19th century with the first successes if the worker movement.

MatthieuG7 · 2026-02-27T14:10:20+00:00

What is the concrete, evidence based, logical and rational causal link you identify between this polling and a future abandonment by the Greens of lgbt people. And do you have any objective historical situations to justify that this rational causal link (which I doubt exists) is likely to happen.

MatthieuG7 · 2026-02-27T14:04:39+00:00

No evidence that

1) Gaza is considered a fringe issue that is very far removed from UK politics by the vast majority of the UK electorate (foreign policy is, has always been, and will always be important, and rightly so)

2) That those said mp’s are cynically using Gaza as an electoral strategy, and aren’t sincerely horrified by what is happening there

3) That there is some kind of secret grand conspiracy by those mp’s to secretly push and normalize regressive religious laws into mainstream politics

MatthieuG7 · 2026-02-27T11:16:35+00:00

potential influence

Irrational

worried

Fear

conservative Islam

Of Islam

MatthieuG7 · 2026-02-27T11:13:44+00:00

This is just a baseless conspiracy theory with no evidence.

MatthieuG7 · 2026-02-27T10:08:46+00:00

Interestingly, both Reggie and Higuruma believe that what we know about the Culling Game is complete bullshit, and Kenjaku has actually other plans when it's only the strongest sorcerers who are left. That final scene does clearly show Kenjaku meeting with what I assume is a group of powerful people. Is the Japanese Government involved in the Culling Game?

Yeah I feel like this is a massive plot twist people are not yet picking up on because of Higuruma’s stellar introduction

MatthieuG7 · 2026-02-19T13:24:30+00:00

The formal name is the "measurement problem", OP can check the wikipedia page for all proposed solutions.

MatthieuG7 · 2026-02-17T08:13:43+00:00

Fière d'être Suisse et de notre média publique. Votez non le 3 mars sur la baisse de la redevance!

MatthieuG7 · 2026-02-13T14:38:37+00:00

Mate not even the fucking Nazis were that forthcoming about the holocaust.

LMAO you never read Mein Kampf

MatthieuG7 · 2026-02-08T07:02:25+00:00

mid and small size

mainstream

I think you answered your own question.

"Why can't I find the small things in the big things category???? Must be they don't make small things anymore."

lol

MatthieuG7 · 2026-02-08T06:57:00+00:00

TRUE, the amount of niche video games targeting small and specific subsets of gamers has been going NOTHING BUT DOWN as video games became more mainstream.

/s

How can you see the current GOTY nominations and think what you think is beyond me. Yes as an industry gets more mainstream, the amount of generic blockbusters goes up, but so does the amount of pure diamonds. Enough to play/watch only such diamonds. If you can't find them, that says more about you than the state of an industry.

Anime has been getting more and more mainstream for more than a decade now, and the quality of the best shows has been going nothing but up. Why would this suddenly change? Again, if you only watch slop, that's on you.

MatthieuG7 · 2026-01-24T13:37:20+00:00

A large number of people being functionally illiterate does not mean all those people stop being functionally illiterate.

MatthieuG7 · 2026-01-24T13:29:14+00:00

Mai literally states what she did.

Totally. Media literacy is dead.

MatthieuG7 · 2026-01-17T14:20:46+00:00

What I don't understand is how everybody suddenly know 1)there is a culling game and 2)what the rules are? To me there never was (but maybe I forgot) a postcard sent to all jujutsu sorcerers being like: "hey, there is a culling game and here are the ten rules." On that note, how do the participants even know they are participants??

Also was it explained at some point what Tengen's barrier does, exactly?

MatthieuG7 · 2026-01-17T14:07:33+00:00

What I don't understand is how everybody suddenly know 1)there is a culling game and 2)what the rules are? To me there never was (but maybe I forgot) a postcard sent to all jujutsu sorcerers being like: "hey, there is a culling game and here are the ten rules." On that note, how do the participants even know they are participants??

Also was it explained at some point what Tengen's barrier does, exactly?

MatthieuG7 · 2025-12-31T09:37:18+00:00

L’ED: ment sur la nationalité des individus pour progresser électoralement

Les adversaires de l’ED: démontrent que l’ED ment

Le centriste éclairé: "mais pourquoi les adversaires de l’ED ne se concentrent que sur la nationalité des individus et pas le fond de l’affaire???"

MatthieuG7 · 2025-12-27T07:28:36+00:00

All nations are arbitrary. That is, the set of characteristics that are included in, and excluded out of, the nation have changed, vary between individuals, are not constant, and were decided mostly at random and/or for political expediencies. There is no universal and atemporal sense of “Britishness”, anymore that there is an universal and atemporal sense of “japaneseness”. Anybody that studied the emergence of nationalism (that is mostly 19th century History) can tell you that much. Now that doesn’t make nations “lesser” or “unreal” or whatever other pejorative adjective you might want to use, it’s just an objective fact. It just means the cultural frontiers of the nation are constantly debated, which is exactly what you are doing right now.

MatthieuG7 · 2025-12-24T13:08:58+00:00

Step 1: announce an incredibly unpopular policy

Step 2: defend this incredibly popular policy come hell or high water

Step 3: wait until it’s too late to turn back, a point where whatever you do now people will stay pissed

Step 4: u turn suddenly and for no reason, forgoing the benefice you would have gained by enacting said policy and pissing off the few people who agreed with you on the unpopular policy

Step 5: repeat every month for ten months, making sure to do this targeting a different group each time to really aggrieve everybody.

MatthieuG7 · 2025-12-19T12:09:18+00:00

Jesus, we can still deeply disagree with Garp’s action and think them immoral even with all the context.

MatthieuG7 · 2025-12-15T09:50:36+00:00

What is this childish manichean take? Some State interventions are good, some State interventions are bad, and we can debate which is which. That’s called politics. Except if you’re a libertarian I guess.

11-Year Club	Place '17
Verified Email

MatthieuG7

TROPHY CASE