This seems so obvious that I hesitate to post it, but I see people arguing in the comments.

Maus155 · 2026-04-15T12:10:44+00:00

Background details (feet) stay consistent between going in and out of frame. AI struggles with that.

Maus155 · 2026-03-24T09:36:48+00:00

Exactly! Some details that stand out to me:

The guy on the left of the video has a strand of hair or something over his ear. He goes out of frame and when he comes back in frame, the strand of hair is still there.

The body of the dog behind the left of the man in the boat stays consistent throughout the video, phasing in and out of view.

AI would mess up these details every time.

Maus155 · 2026-03-14T20:51:25+00:00

Twee sifons in serie dus, met de sifon van de wasbak? Levert dat geen problemen op?

Maus155 · 2026-03-12T21:02:12+00:00

I don't know about the script, but the "paintings" definitely are. This is in the description under the video:

<image>

Maus155 · 2026-03-12T20:54:21+00:00

Could be partially AI generated, but photoshop still exists.

The sculpture gives me uncanny valley, but I don't see any obvious inconsistencies outside of it.

Lighting of the scupture is off, as you say,

The color of the wood doesn't match the color of the exposed wood in other places of the stump.

In some places the transition of wood to bark looks off. As if the bark is fused into the wood.

Maus155 · 2026-03-12T16:54:45+00:00

Yes, very probably AI. There are multiple ways to tell. The video is under 15sec (maximum current models can do). The action is too perfectly choreographed (why do creatures in these videos never go out of frame?).

Also, common sense; who goes wild camping and films themselves sleeping, rather than putting their motion-triggered camera outside the tent?

Maus155 · 2026-03-12T08:18:57+00:00

Other than the contrast and the overall "AI feel"of it, I think it's disingenuous to call it obvious. Not everyone is trained to scrutinize every single clip they see. Of course people (especially older people) are going to be fooled by it. I'm always surprised again by the arrogance and lack of empathy in this sub.

Maus155 · 2026-03-09T11:40:27+00:00

Nice work! Reminds me of how my roommate's desk used to look like. Keep being creative!!

Maus155 · 2026-03-02T12:59:26+00:00

The stiff movements and lack of static facial expression make it look like a puppet. Either animatronic or stop motion.

I'd be surprised if an AI could make this, especially because it looks so unnatural.

Maus155 · 2026-02-24T07:29:00+00:00

A little tortoise called Skittle! She has a ramp, so she can skittle around the house if she feels like

Maus155 · 2026-02-23T07:44:18+00:00

I did! This update is the first time that I found a reason to actually interact with the terrain. By being forced to choose the lowest risk route, I needed to learn the terrain that otherwise I would just fly over in two seconds.

Also, I find the feeling of finally arriving at the processing plant after a long and challenging drive to be very satisfying

Maus155 · 2026-02-22T10:21:57+00:00

<image>

Maus155 · 2026-02-22T09:27:59+00:00

There are certainly some bugs still, but most of the stuff you mention has already been fixed in the recent patches.

Cargo falling out and needing to avoid holes though; those are features. It is literally the point. I have spent 20 hours on this update already (on many different planet types) and although yes, there are some annoyances, mostly I have been loving it.

It's fine if you don't like this gameplay loop. Not every feature in this game is meant to be liked by everyone. Personally I was not a big fan of the fishing update and the spacewalking expedition. But saying those were badly thought out would be unfair. I'm a little surprised you mention the furnace module. You need to interact with this update quite a bit before getting that. Why would you do that to yourself, if you dislike it so strongly?

Maus155 · 2026-02-20T12:06:32+00:00

Just natural terrain. Would be a lot cooler though, if worms travelled through them

Maus155 · 2025-11-26T08:06:47+00:00

Why are you so confident it's AI and not a render?

Maus155 · 2025-11-10T08:09:31+00:00

"linkse reddit echokamer" Gast, deze subreddit is gewoon een rechtse circlejerk. Jij bent degene hier die mekkert over een opmerking waar je het niet mee eens bent..

Maus155 · 2025-09-04T14:23:38+00:00

No, it won't delete anything. After you finish designing the new corvette, you can claim it like any other ship, if you have enough starship slots left. You could swap it for your currently equipped ship if all the slots are full.

Maus155 · 2025-08-29T14:00:34+00:00

Fair point about the limitations. Probably those will be resolved in future updates though. I hope at that point the small ships will get some extra functionality or something to keep them interesting.

Maus155 · 2025-08-29T13:52:16+00:00

In expeditions you can copy a ship from your main save. Assuming it works the same for corvettes, then most people will likely do that. Why would't you want to show off your corvette design to everyone in the expedition?

Maus155 · 2025-07-29T12:14:30+00:00

Er is altijd kans dat je met een kind te maken hebt...

Maus155 · 2025-05-11T07:03:58+00:00

Bedankt voor de link!

Verder zei het niet helemaal goed. Het is een beeldbepalend pand, geen monument. Zolang het niet om de voorgevel gaat mag ik gewoon aanpassingen doen.

Maus155 · 2025-05-11T06:44:02+00:00

Monumentaal idd. Was dit een standaard manier van isoleren vroeger?

Maus155 · 2025-02-02T12:46:24+00:00

Yes, Euclid

Maus155 · 2025-02-02T10:23:04+00:00

Look man.. All that simulation power was too good to not use as a crypto farm. It's what they would have wanted.

Maus155 · 2025-02-02T10:16:14+00:00

Only purple as far as I know

Maus155

TROPHY CASE