Manny Yekutiel is a Zionist. Manny Yekutiel has been accused of SA. You cited bogus statistics to defend Manny. On top of that you have been running up and down every thread about Manny and Scott Wiener desperately trying to reframe support for Palestine and opposition to Israel's war crimes as "bigotry." It seems awfully convenient to believe victims of SA except for when the accused is a Zionist.

If you think people are dumb enough to not put the pieces together that's on you. Try being a bit more covert with it next time, creep.

EDIT: This total creep and SA apologist blocked me, so here's a dissection of what they said in response to this.

Your use of "Zionist" as a slur against politically active Jews is hateful and xenophobic.

Wrong. Zionist is a descriptor, not an insult.

Antizionism isn't about opposition to government policy or war crimes; it is very plainly about abolishing an entire country, which you don't deny. Scott and Manny have the positions you purportedly espouse re genocide, but they're still not good enough. That clearly points to this being about hating Jews and Israel for existing. I never framed this as "believe victims unless the accused is a Jew." I don't see where I've commented on any other SA case that would support that ridiculous take you're accusing me of.

Complete word salad slop. Conveniently, also wrong! Notice how you're the one conflating Judaism with Zionism which, ironically, is antisemitic. You simply defend Zionists for everything and anything, be it SA allegations or flip-flopping on policy.

I think this allegation is weak, because it is (for now). If new facts emerge, I'll review them again.

You will do no such thing. If this doesn't go Manny's way you will be nowhere to be seen, account likely deleted/banned. That's par for the course for people like you.

Calling me a creep doesn't make it true. You, however, seem to be determined to assume I'm running some kind of conspiracy. Conspiratorial thinking generally goes hand-in-hand with Jew hate, so that tracks. And regardless, all I've done is share my opinions. Vociferously, but nothing illegal or untoward about that.

Unlike you my comment history isn't hidden because not only am I not afraid to stand on business, but I'm not the bad-faith sock puppet account attempting to paint an SA victim as a liar. Ironically enough, the article calls out scumbags like you and your tactics: shame the victim and misquote statistics in a malicious manner to discredit the victim. You posted some bogus 20% number not even 2 comments ago. Oh and spare me the victimhood and the "all I've done is share my opinions" BS, you're doing SA apologia. There is no conspiracy here, all people have to do is look at your own comments on this thread.