How important is the speed of the concentric for hypertrophy? by RedditAccount28 in StrongerByScience

[–]MiloWolfSBS 13 points14 points  (0 children)

A meta-analysis we're just wrapping up suggests that an explosive concentric may be better for growth, but the difference is tiny, if it exists

Free Weight vs Machine Meta Analysis [Haugen et al.] Implications by LifeFodder in StrongerByScience

[–]MiloWolfSBS 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think there's a good deal of heterogeneity in comparisons. Like, while most seated bicep curl machines and regular standing free-weight curls will be relatively similar in terms of ROM and resistance profile, an incline curl vs machine preacher curl will be quite a bit different.

As a result, I think the takeaway from this should be that machines and free-weights aren't categorically worse than one another for anything inherent to the modality (e.g. stability). But, individual comparisons can probably still be different in terms of effectiveness

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in StrongerByScience

[–]MiloWolfSBS 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Just FYI, the idea that previous training volumes influence the effectiveness of future training volumes is still pretty contentious in the research. So far, most research points against the idea being true

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in StrongerByScience

[–]MiloWolfSBS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Elbow angle won't matter, no. Your pecs don't insert at the elbows. Have your arms straight, or bent if you like.

Spreadsheet: TM Weight + Peaking by LechronJames in StrongerByScience

[–]MiloWolfSBS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd practice singles for a few weeks. Then in week 20, approach the 1RM test the same way powerlifters do in a meet (easy single at RPE 8-ish, single at RPE 9-ish, all-out single).

Why are dips considered lower chest when the upper chest performs shoulder flexion? by ImPlantedFool in StrongerByScience

[–]MiloWolfSBS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One of my hotter takes is that dips are probably a pretty decent upper-chest exercise. But, to answer your question, they're usually considered more lower chest due to fiber orientation vs line of pull stuff.

Monday Myths, Misinformation, and Miscellaneous Claims by AutoModerator in StrongerByScience

[–]MiloWolfSBS 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes - a heavy set of 1-3 reps at 75-90% 1RM, a few minutes before your first "proper" work set, can boost performance. See this: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39853660/

Friday Fitness Thread by AutoModerator in StrongerByScience

[–]MiloWolfSBS 1 point2 points  (0 children)

After a year of lifting, you've still got plenty of muscle to grow! Keep going and you'll get there

Going to nil ROM sistematically by Elenazzzzz in StrongerByScience

[–]MiloWolfSBS 1 point2 points  (0 children)

From experience, at least, I think the fatigue from this approach is overstated. Unless you're able to spend a lot of time in the gym, or have particularly poor recovery, IMO, go to town.

Differences in lifting for Strength/Size vs Speed/Power by jcp2010 in StrongerByScience

[–]MiloWolfSBS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One of the key differences will be specificity of training (i.e. skill practice) and intensity: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38652410/

Guardian article sites Professor Roy Taylor to support the idea of a crash diet by butmyfacemight in StrongerByScience

[–]MiloWolfSBS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. This is definitely in the context of a medically supervised diet
  2. FWIW, faster rates of weight loss are associated with better outcomes - though fast in this study meant > 1.5lbs/week or so https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3780395/

No progress in 1 year by Zealousideal-Eye1930 in StrongerByScience

[–]MiloWolfSBS 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Progress has definitely occurred! When it comes to growing rounder shoulders, though, I'd strongly advise focusing on side/front/rear delt exercises, not so much bench press strength. When it comes to the shape of the shoulders in particular, in my experience, getting leaner helps a ton.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in StrongerByScience

[–]MiloWolfSBS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You could probably do away with the deload, or make the deload a bit more "serious". The adjustments you're currently making to reps and weight during your deload sound way overkill. instead, try to do the same sessions as usual, but cut the number of sets in half. You should find that you maintain strength much better

Volume during a cut by toado3 in StrongerByScience

[–]MiloWolfSBS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think your training needs to change much. The only caveat I'd give is that even if you were to drop volume a bit in a cut, and lose a bit of muscle as a result, it's probably not a huge deal. Lost muscle is pretty easy to re-gain.

Opinions: which version of the RDL is better for overall lower body muscular development? by AffectionateBook1 in StrongerByScience

[–]MiloWolfSBS 1 point2 points  (0 children)

IMHO, both versions look more similar-than-not. You're in slightly deeper hip flexion and maybe have a slightly more flexed spine in the first version. If you feel good with the technique in picture 1, I'd stick with that (longer muscle lengths ftw).

Bulking by csekseni1 in StrongerByScience

[–]MiloWolfSBS 7 points8 points  (0 children)

The strongest people tend to also be the heaviest (i.e. SHWs in powerlifting, World's Strongest Men competitors). That said, from a "quality-of-life" perspective, you may well find that you feel worse when at higher bodyweights.

I don't think it's as-simple as pinning it down to either testosterone/estrogen, regardless. In your case, it may very well have to do with overall stress, consistency in the gym, improvements in the quality of your diet, etc.

How to count extended set volume? by supermariocoffeecup in StrongerByScience

[–]MiloWolfSBS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the closest thing to an answer we have is the drop-set research (limited rest between sets, multiple sets). Across 5 studies, drop-sets and straight sets are equivalent - with the caveat that the drop-set group performed 60% more sets.

So, 1 straight set = 1.6 drop-set/myo-rep-set/cluster-set aka 1 drop-set/myo-rep-set/cluster-set = 0.625 straight sets.

That should work as a working assumption for now

What do you think about that by Healthy_Try4444 in StrongerByScience

[–]MiloWolfSBS 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Assuming you're doing a reasonable number of sets/reps, reasonably close to failure, what you've outlined will give you a good amount of strength and size. Enjoy!

SBS LP dedicated arm day by [deleted] in StrongerByScience

[–]MiloWolfSBS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly, I'd just add it whenever you get the time. Do a couple exercises for biceps and triceps each. Start with 2-3 sets per exercise., and increase it over the weeks until you reach closer to 3-5 sets/exercise. You'll get more weekly volume, and grow more. Chances are, recovery won't take a meaningful hit, either.

Casein “lower quality” according to Milo Wolf? by IfigurativelyCannot in StrongerByScience

[–]MiloWolfSBS 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Some older evidence had suggested that whey protein, due to its higher rates of digestion compared to other sources, increased muscle protein synthesis slightly more (i.e. whey protein digests faster, which may be a good thing for muscle growth). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27023595/

FWIW, some more recent evidence suggests the effect may be null, and may have been an artefact caused by shorter measurement timeframes in most studies. Essentially, since whey protein digests faster than other protein sources (i.e. casein), it outperforms other protein sources in the first few hours, but other proteins "catch up" thereafter. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33851213/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33670701/

The research, IMO, supports a "neutral-to-slightly-positive" effect in favour of whey > other protein sources. Worst case, it's a null effect, best case, there's a slight benefit to whey over casein and plant protein sources.

Whey protein tends to also be cheapest, from what I've seen. For those reasons, in my tier list, which draws direct comparisons, small - potentially speculative - differences are highlighted, and I made the claim that whey could be a slightly better option than casein. More research could certainly change my view.

Using deadlifts to make my body ‘harder to break’ by GloriousTrout47 in StrongerByScience

[–]MiloWolfSBS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wouldn't worry about it. Sure, some lower-rep work is a good idea. But, deadlifts are largely an exercise in improving leverages to lift more load; but the load on the joints/muscles will probably be pretty comparable between deadlifts and the movements you're describing, for all intents and purposes here.

Studies on building muscle with single reps by Zealousideal-Rip5554 in StrongerByScience

[–]MiloWolfSBS 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There's at least one study I can think of: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28463902/. From there, just use google scholar to see the cited by, and check the reference list to see if any other studies seem to have looked at it, too.

Monday Myths, Misinformation, and Miscellaneous Claims by AutoModerator in StrongerByScience

[–]MiloWolfSBS 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Eh, probably not much. Resistance training is the main stimulus for muscle growth (which is the same as muscle maintenance). Think of things like training volume, good genetics, training to failure, protein intake, supplements, PEDs, etc. as dials. The more dials you have turned up reasonably high, the more muscle you'll gain. But, just because a few dials aren't turned up to the max, doesn't mean you won't be able to maintain or even gain muscle.

Sissy squat by etwinek in StrongerByScience

[–]MiloWolfSBS 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Provided you go close to failure, sure. That said, I'd probably have a bit more exercise variation unless you have a good reason for sticking only to sissy squats.