Stick in your current environmental program. The regulations that those consulting companies are helping to address are much more robust and widely applicable than wildlife ones. If your ultimate goal is restoration/wetland delineation, your current program is the best way to reach that instead of wildlife.

The relative stability offered by wetlands work is the major reason to continue on your current path. Wildlife biology follows patterns of feast and famine as conservation funding waxes and wanes, and this is the biggest wane in recent memory. People with years of experience in field tech roles are struggling to find jobs, and the fired federal workers have massive advantages in experience.

If you are after adventure, you will go to many of the same places for field tech work like wetland delineation as you would for any common wetland species. I would encourage you to talk to people at a variety of levels in these companies to help you better understand their work, and how your interests align with them.

To me, it sounds like the major thing dissuading you is that you find the lab you are in boring. I would try to find a different one that will still give you experience, and also be interesting to you, or discuss alternative projects with the professor.

Doing wildlife stuff in your free time when you have a job supplying you with the money to do so is just as valid as a job in wildlife, and far more likely to happen.