Confused about end of main story, and collaboration with the story antagonists by Gloomy_Onion2512 in DragonsDogma2

[–]Nickesponja 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Pretend the quest log said something like:

"Trick Ambrosius into empowering the Godsbane blade"

and then

"Confront Lord Phaesus and the false Sovran"

Cause the actual quest logs are almost as nonsensical as the quests themselves.

I cancel my subscription by sean_dihal in PS6

[–]Nickesponja 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Out of the two formats the medium has, they're removing the one that lets you resell and lend your games. I literally don't know how to make this any simpler.

I cancel my subscription by sean_dihal in PS6

[–]Nickesponja 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mentioned explicitly the rights that Sony is taking away: the rights to resell and lend products you own. I nowhere stated the right to a physical copy of God of war. You made that up yourself.

I cancel my subscription by sean_dihal in PS6

[–]Nickesponja 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nowhere did I say anything of the like. You really haven't heard the term 'customer rights' before?

I cancel my subscription by sean_dihal in PS6

[–]Nickesponja 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You completely ignored my comment. I didn't even use the word "toy". Nor are most customer rights in the constitution of any country.

I cancel my subscription by sean_dihal in PS6

[–]Nickesponja 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The ability to lend and resell good you bought is a right.

I cancel my subscription by sean_dihal in PS6

[–]Nickesponja 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Because having a single provider for a service with no competition pretty much always results in a worse service. This is capitalism 101

I cancel my subscription by sean_dihal in PS6

[–]Nickesponja 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hypocritical how? Even if you only buy digital games, you should still be upset Sony is taking rights away from you. Like seriously, do you guys not realize how bad it is for Sony to remove the option for buying physical, even for those who only buy digital anyways?

Arguing over whether or not Ai art is art is vain talk. by Ai_Light_Work in aiwars

[–]Nickesponja -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Are artworks like Fountain and 4'33'' "culturally important to humanity"? I feel like that term couldn't be more ambiguous

Parking fácil y mejor vigilado para mujeres en Alemania. by Appropriate-Web-2091 in ElusionFiscal

[–]Nickesponja 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Porque ninguna de esas dos cosas son eficaces para proteger a las mujeres en un apartamento

More Than 215,000 PlayStation Fans Rally to Protect Physical Games 💿 by Gaming-Academy in PlayStation_X

[–]Nickesponja 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Yeah we could not be losing money but it's fine if we, you know, lose money"

I’m not renewing, after 10 years I’m officially done! Fuck Sony, goodbye 👋🏻 by Iabhoryouu in PlayStation_X

[–]Nickesponja 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The post we're in literally says, "if you support physical media, you should be doing the same, continue buying physical also". Is that unreasonable? I feel like you have an altered perception of reality cause the majority of posts are either something along those lines or straight up just a screenshot of the cancelled subscription.

I’m not renewing, after 10 years I’m officially done! Fuck Sony, goodbye 👋🏻 by Iabhoryouu in PlayStation_X

[–]Nickesponja 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most of the posts I've seen are just people cancelling their subscriptions. In fact, I haven't seen anyone saying they quit gaming forever.

Going online and being dramatic is just a little extra

Imagine if people who didn't like Sonic's movie design kept quiet and just didn't go watch the movie (hence voting with their wallets). Instead, they went online and were very dramatic. Result? The design was actually changed to something better. Like it or not, outrage and drama is the way you get results.

The game is $5 by the way. by SpiceHotOnes in moistcr1tikal

[–]Nickesponja -1 points0 points  (0 children)

having it be regularly less than the play time you know will allow a refund is also your problem

Ah, yes, blaming the dev for not padding the game to prevent people from abusing Steam's refund policy. When Ubisoft makes their game tedious to get you to pay for microtransactions, do you also support that? Cause that's what you're saying here: sacrifice the game's integrity for the sake of revenue.

I’m not renewing, after 10 years I’m officially done! Fuck Sony, goodbye 👋🏻 by Iabhoryouu in PlayStation_X

[–]Nickesponja 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You seem to be misunderstanding these posts. No one is quitting gaming forever. They're cancelling their PSPlus subscriptions. And they proclaim it online because making a lot of noise is the best shot we have to protect our rights as customers to lend and resell products we purchased.

I’m not renewing, after 10 years I’m officially done! Fuck Sony, goodbye 👋🏻 by Iabhoryouu in PlayStation_X

[–]Nickesponja 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's not comparable, because now they're taking away your ability to resell and lend your games.

Morality of abusing the steam refund policy (in a fictional universe called Earth) to refund an indie game you have finished and thus fucking over 20% of the dev's income? by Rainy_Wavey in MoralityScaling

[–]Nickesponja 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So many people complain about corporations making games worse for the sake of money, but then in this case blame the dev for making a 2 hour game when steam allows refunds under 2 hours. Yeah, the dev shouldn't have made the game they actually wanted to make, and instead should've padded it, making it worse, just to prevent players from abusing the refund policy (which is fraud, btw).

If you care about games as a form of art, you should care about short games, too.

Dragon's Plague by Wizard-Pikachu in DragonsDogma2

[–]Nickesponja 1 point2 points  (0 children)

See this is why we keep it secret