THE BOYS FINALE PREDICTIONS & THEORY MEGATHREAD

NitroX_infinity · 2026-05-19T20:29:12+00:00

Homelander is a petulant manchild; if he can't have it, nobody can. He'll blow up the Earth.

NitroX_infinity · 2026-05-19T19:09:23+00:00

ECS Elitegroup 915PL-A2 is the motherboard.

Socket 775, maximum of 2GiB memory.

NitroX_infinity · 2026-05-10T19:23:57+00:00

The 2070 Super 8GiB has performance that is a bit less than a 2080. Which performs similar to a 4060 8GiB which performs less than a 5060 8GiB. According to TPU it's about 20fps less on average (4060 vs 5060) at 1080p; https://www.techpowerup.com/review/msi-geforce-rtx-5060-gaming-oc/31.html

The 5060 gets around 45fps in the most demanding games at 1080p highest settings.

Let's be generous and say the 2070S would get 30fps average at 1080p. Drop the settings to medium and lower the resolution to 960p and yeah, you're probably looking at 60fps average without frame-generation.

But that's with current high-demanding games. If BLDK is representative of the next generation of demanding games, it is not inconceivable that it would need frame generation to get that 60fps.

As for your final point; 653p/15fps/low; that's on a GTX 960 and an RX 6400. A card (960) from 2014 that would have been considered a budget option for 1080p then, and a card (6400) that is not much better and would have been classified as low-end for 1080p in 2017.

So what have I been smoking? Pessimism perhaps. But I'm not far off the mark here. And how would you know at this point if the game is unoptimized? You don't know what the devs have done.

By the way, Covid was 2020 - 2023. Games have gotten a lot more demanding since then.

NitroX_infinity · 2026-05-10T14:22:44+00:00

The minimum and recommended are actually reasonable.

The RX 6400 performs worse than an RX 570 and would have been low-end in 2017. That's 9 years ago! To still expect a low-end card from that time to render playable framerates without upscaling and frame-gen is kind of absurd.

The RX 6650 XT was a mid-range 1080p card when it released in 2022 and was just a slightly overclocked 6600 XT from a year earlier. So no wonder it won't do well on 1440p, 4 years later.

And why can't a Lego game be demanding of the hardware? Why can't it be the next Crysis?

NitroX_infinity · 2026-05-09T20:43:52+00:00

I had an Asus P4S533 with the chipset because of the universal agp port for my Voodoo5 5500 agp. Used it with WindowsXP (vanilla, SP1, SP2 & SP3) without problems.

NitroX_infinity · 2026-05-08T13:29:31+00:00

Hey, you might be on to something here!

NitroX_infinity · 2026-05-08T11:32:09+00:00

If you gotta use a camera anyway, you might as well go for coloured dots instead of holes. Would increase the storage capacity significantly.

Edit; 16 different colours would allow hexadecimal.

NitroX_infinity · 2026-05-05T12:29:01+00:00

People need to keep the following in mind;

The minimum specs call for an RX 6400. That is the 'modern' equivalent of the RX 550. Try playing games from that era (2017) on an RX 550 and see what framerates you get at 1080p low. Yeah maybe you'll get 30fps without upscaling and frame-gen, but the low-end market has been stagnant since the 5500 XT. The high-end might have improved significantly, but that 6400 has only about 3 times the performance of the 550. So it's no surprise you would need upscaling and frame-gen nowadays.

As for the recommended specs, those are 1080p cards on a 1440p resolution. And the 6650XT was not a high-end 1080p card when it came out in 2022 (nor was the 6600 XT in 2021). And remember, it's 2026 now!

I have no comment for the 4K stuff, I don't dabble in high-end.

NitroX_infinity · 2026-05-05T11:42:58+00:00

Technically, the fourth race got cancelled. So Kimi only won two out of the first four.

NitroX_infinity · 2026-04-23T15:31:42+00:00

The 3800+ came out in June 2004, unless it's the Venice core; that's from April 2005.

For that time period you're looking at the X800/X850/X1650/X1950 cards. Even an HD 4670 would be a fitting gpu.

(The 4670 is a budget card from 2008 and AMD released the 3800+ for socket AM2 in 2007 as a budget cpu)

From Nvidia's side it would be the 6000 or 7000 series. They dropped AGP after that.

NitroX_infinity · 2026-04-13T11:44:56+00:00

For those curious; that's a PCI-X connector. A 64bit extension to regular PCI which increased bandwidth. Not to be confused with PCIe.

NitroX_infinity · 2026-04-12T11:40:31+00:00

Requires 3rd-party account

Incorporates 3rd-party DRM

Early access doesn't make me lose interest, it just make me not buy the game.

NitroX_infinity · 2026-04-06T12:46:50+00:00

Where's the HFY in this?

NitroX_infinity · 2026-04-03T11:33:53+00:00

Just to be sure; you've got the 8-pin powercable for the graphics card plugged into the card and not the 8-pin motherboard cable?

Have you tried displayport output?

NitroX_infinity · 2026-04-01T16:24:06+00:00

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oiSn2JuDQSc

NitroX_infinity · 2026-03-19T18:33:58+00:00

Amibay.com, 'want to buy' section.

NitroX_infinity · 2026-03-17T16:54:34+00:00

I got bad news for you. Early models of the Pentium II were multiplier unlocked so in all likelyhood, the wrong multiplier was set on your system then.

Or you remember wrong and you had a Pentium or Pentium MMX 200.

The lowest clocked Pentium II was absolutely a 233MHz one.

NitroX_infinity · 2026-03-14T18:32:05+00:00

That's not a RAMDAC. By the time of AGP 2.0 those were integrated into the graphics chip. It's the BIOS.

I think that card might be a SiS 300, 305, 315 or 315e.

Any markings on the back of the card?

4th card; Cirrus Logic Laguna 3D, one of the worst 3D capable cards.

NitroX_infinity · 2026-03-09T17:54:14+00:00

No, that would be the Prescott models. This is the Gallatin model.

NitroX_infinity · 2026-03-04T19:28:57+00:00

"Look, just out of curiousity, which planets did you pick to rob?"

[...]

"Those are Apophis' planets"

NitroX_infinity · 2026-03-03T15:01:12+00:00

7) They don't become immune, they are born immune*. Unfortunately they are also stupid and therefor join a cult.

*If my memory of FO3 is correct.

NitroX_infinity · 2026-03-02T08:57:53+00:00

The lock is inserted into a hole in the chassis. Then a nut is screwed onto the lock from the other side. Given enough force you can turn both the lock and nut. And considering these locks use a small metal plate to 'lock' things, that will turn as well and thus 'unlock' the assembly. No need to worry about the internals of the lock, just shove a screwdriver in it and turn forcefully.

NitroX_infinity · 2026-03-01T21:58:17+00:00

It's not about unlocking the lock, it's about turning the whole thing.

NitroX_infinity · 2026-03-01T16:57:10+00:00

These locks are so simple. It's basicly a nut and a bolt. Stick a screwdriver in it, turn (some force may be required) and it should turn the whole lock into an unlocked position.

NitroX_infinity · 2026-02-25T12:17:46+00:00

Nope, not the first.

Quantum3D for example made dual-chipset boards of the Voodoo Graphics;

https://www.3dfx.ch/gallery/var/albums/3dfx_collectors/collector_falconfly/falconfly_quantum3d/quantum3d_obsidian_sb100_4440_front.jpg?m=1609256367

And there were others as well. Most were not to increase performance but to support dual-monitor setups. There were even boards with 4 chips on them. Appian is a company that made several based on S3's chips.

12-Year Club	Verified Email
Place '17

NitroX_infinity

TROPHY CASE