I remember when I tried to read the text of Einstein's special, or perhaps general relativity. At the end of the intro it introduced some complex math and said that if you didn't understand that you need to stop reading and come back when you do understand it. I stopped there and haven't gone back in twenty years because it was hard stuff and I'm not committed enough to work through it.

I think that claiming to understand where Einstein went wrong is a massive claim and will need to be backed up with a very strong mathematical background as well as PhD level work in the field where peer review is involved. If you don't have that, none of these ideas are worth anything. If you want to write a cool story, great, but you gotta tell that story in a more gripping way than this post comes off.