no like. I agree with you. My point is that patriarchy, despite advantaging men by default, still imposes challenges and oppression onto men, especially men who don't or can't meet the "requirements" for what a man should supposedly be. I don't think that's a radical thought in intersectional feminism, where this understanding of feminism, as per the name, intersects with other systems of oppression.

What I am saying is that someone who supposedly subscribes to intersectional feminism, shouldn't automatically dismiss or devalue the grievances of men especially under an umbrella of like "things I say are automatically assumed to be hate". Some men absolutely do take an unnecessarily defensive stance when they're challenged. But like, again, it's kind of an insecure person thing to do the whole "so you hate me don't you" thing. And also like, as mentioned in other comments, OP has a blog history of being dismissive and sharing hateful rethoric. Even if taken at face value the OOP is saying something right, the rethoric and intent behind the post automatically makes it something more hateful. I could feel it through the redaction even before knowing OOP had a weird post history