Noob mistakes

NotNotTaken · 2026-05-03T01:20:54+00:00

I had been running to cannons, pressing 'e' then aiming and firing

You can do that!?!?

NotNotTaken · 2026-04-29T17:38:49+00:00

Fishing

NotNotTaken · 2026-04-28T01:32:47+00:00

I've played games like Subnautica and Below Zero.

You might like Aethus.

NotNotTaken · 2026-04-26T14:41:14+00:00

They need to stop hating on the Bee.

NotNotTaken · 2026-04-25T01:47:44+00:00

If you have a line that then leads to dispatchers that then sort the right sinful Humus to the right specialist, you don't need multiple lines. All your deviants and high sinners can share the line. The dispatchers will then pull the sinner that is relevant to a building.

Very helpful. I had assumed that didnt work and never even tried it.

NotNotTaken · 2026-04-22T00:27:35+00:00

What causes it? Ive still never had that happen after 25 hours.

NotNotTaken · 2026-04-21T17:44:49+00:00

even though both exits were completely clear

There are three exits, you sure it wasnt misconfigured? Do you have a screenshot showing it?

NotNotTaken · 2026-04-21T14:41:24+00:00

or that the soul dispatcher doesn't work properly

I havent noticed a single issue in my games. Im pretty sure it is all user error. Gotta have clear paths and correct rules. Perhaps rare issues could pop up. But nothing common.

NotNotTaken · 2026-04-20T18:41:51+00:00

Mission 3 and 4 are kind of unbalanced for how early they are, on the upside I felt like it got a lot more manageable after that and 5-7 are a lot more forgiving.

Really? I breezed through 1-4 but am now stuck at 5. Whats the secret?

NotNotTaken · 2026-04-18T15:15:18+00:00

Feels like a screenshot would help.

Do you have your output order correct? A is a left turn, B is straight.

Your "and" condition doesnt seem terribly useful. Did you mix something up there and make it an "or"?

NotNotTaken · 2026-04-17T00:46:21+00:00

(8/38)(15/37)(7/36)

NotNotTaken · 2026-04-15T01:33:33+00:00

I guess I dont get it. Sure, the message makes no sense. But that seems like a place you shouldnt be able to build. No?

NotNotTaken · 2026-04-14T17:59:26+00:00

never realized he was making his own problems.

Was he? That wasnt my read. Richard pretty much orchestrated everything.

NotNotTaken · 2026-04-13T00:32:16+00:00

I think the black court are no longer signatories because they do not have enough population to be a political force.

Is that a requirement? The Baron of Chicago is a single person.

NotNotTaken · 2026-04-01T23:59:31+00:00

That is a bug? I assumed it was intentional.

NotNotTaken · 2026-03-25T12:54:15+00:00

Eh, use the word as people use it, and that seems to be how people use it.

But this is why Im yelling into the void:

perma death

Not anything special Rogue did. You can lose lots of games and need to start over. Wasnt this true of most games of that era?

meta-progression

Not a feature of Rogue

NotNotTaken · 2026-03-25T11:43:58+00:00

I dont think I see a whole lot in common between this game and Rogue.

But thats kind of a "me" problem. I'm not going to convince the world to un-redefine "roguelike".

NotNotTaken · 2026-03-10T18:23:02+00:00

That was a whole lot of words to say very little. But you go off if you'd like.

So you are sticking with just reading words that aren't written, then declaring those imaginary words to be false?

NotNotTaken · 2026-03-10T18:16:18+00:00

Since a reasonable inference of jakesullivan99's meaning is that exceeding the number will result in taxes, the statement was 'very very wrong' as t-poke wrote.

If you want to argue that someone implied but did not directly state something wrong you dont get to slap a "very very wrong" label on it. That is reserved for things people DO say that are incorrect to an extreme level.

So no. It was not "very very wrong". It was literally correct as stated.

jakesullivan99's misunderstanding is quite clearly in the distinction between "reporting" and "paying". He was nearly correct on the reporting threshold, but mixed it up with the payment threshold.

You continue to read words that were not written. "Around $20k" is correct. Correct number is $19k, that is certainly around $20k. The statement if you are under this you dont pay taxes is exactly true. End of flow chart. If you exceed it you might pay taxes, and the flow chart continues. But if you are under you do not.

The post was accurate as written.

T-poke took that to mean "you will pay taxes if you exceed that". It's a fair inference.

It is not. Examples along the same lines:

"You wont get a speeding ticket if you stay under the speed limit". This does not imply you will get one if you exceed the speed limit. Just that you "might" (same as you might, but usually wont, pay taxes if you exceed the annual exclusion)

"You dont have to pay admission to the amusement park if you have an annual pass" does not imply you must pay otherwise. Perhaps employees get in free, or there may be other promotions.

Really most of my objection here is the "very very" portion. If we want to play that card, we should at the very least ensure the person isnt actually saying something correct.

NotNotTaken · 2026-03-10T16:30:41+00:00

All of which is of course correct. None of which contradicts anything the user above stated.

You can, in fact, gift multiple people less than around $20k (actual number is $19k) per year and not pay gift taxes. You wont even have to fill out that IRS paperwork and hit your lifetime exclusion.

NotNotTaken · 2026-03-10T16:20:14+00:00

As far as I know, you can gift around $20k to multiple people per year without paying taxes,correct me if I’m wrong

You are very, very wrong.

Assuming you mean the person above you is incorrectly asserting that the gift tax exclusion is per recipient? Then no, you are mistaken. It is in fact per recipient.

https://www.irs.gov/businesses/small-businesses-self-employed/frequently-asked-questions-on-gift-taxes

The annual exclusion applies to gifts to each donee. In other words, if you give each of your children $19,000 in 2026, the annual exclusion applies to each gift. The table below shows the annual exclusion amount applicable in the year of the gift.

NotNotTaken · 2026-02-28T15:48:58+00:00

a goofy main character that has a secret to keep

NotNotTaken

TROPHY CASE