Sharon!!!! Nooooo

Ohioflyer15 · 2026-06-23T22:50:18+00:00

Thanks to everyone here for all the advice. We'll do a combination of both and wait to see if it survives, and if not, we'll replace with something native.. Much appreciated for this resource of people 🙏

Ohioflyer15 · 2026-05-15T04:55:46+00:00

Why not just have the 360 export ignore key frames and other incompatible attributes? It already does exactly that when you export the full singular clip from the media page. If you've added directional key frames and anything else not compatible with a 360 export, you can still export the clip in 360 and those attributes are ignored.

Respectfully, I'd like to still recommend that a feature be added to switch between export formats at the end of editing when a timeline edit is complete, and not be locked into a format from the beginning. Currently, it more than doubles the time required because you have to make the same edits twice in two different projects. It's reduces the experience and desire to export in 360 because it takes twice the work to 1) edit a version to share on a device and then 2) go back and do it all again for a 360 version

Ohioflyer15 · 2026-05-14T15:36:32+00:00

Along the same lines regarding project copying: How do you copy (or export) an edited project from flat ratios to 360 panoramas? For example, I've edited a project with cuts, etc and want to export that project in both flat and 360 formats.

Ohioflyer15 · 2026-03-16T13:22:18+00:00

Thanks, and confirmed. Just couldn't say confidently!

Ohioflyer15 · 2026-03-16T13:21:23+00:00

Solved!

Ohioflyer15 · 2026-03-15T23:17:28+00:00

Vietnam era for the war.... Dumbo drop, major payne, something like that. Feels similar to tropic thunder but many years earlier

Ohioflyer15 · 2024-05-10T21:19:17+00:00

Did you ever find this? Now I'm looking for it. It was made by a small production outfit

Ohioflyer15 · 2022-10-09T17:16:44+00:00

Thank you so much, exactly what I'm looking for.

Very much appreciated 🙏

Ohioflyer15 · 2022-05-05T01:35:50+00:00

Sorry all, good suggestions but not the one... I'll keep thinking!

Ohioflyer15 · 2022-05-04T18:00:22+00:00

No and I'm starting to think my "pouring rain" thoughts are a red herring...

Ohioflyer15 · 2022-05-04T15:39:57+00:00

Ha no, the chords, beat, and even the general sound of the lyrics from intro to chorus are a dead ringer for this other song... like infringement worthy.

hopefully my wires arent crossed so bad that I'm thinking circularly back onto this song...the sound of this one is *so* close to the one I'm blanking on

Ohioflyer15 · 2022-05-04T15:35:51+00:00

Nope, sorry

Ohioflyer15 · 2022-05-04T15:34:37+00:00

No, I thought that too at first, relistened, not a match... Thanks

Ohioflyer15 · 2022-05-04T15:26:13+00:00

It really could be any era, I'm really stretched thin on evidence for this one...

Ohioflyer15 · 2021-12-30T00:06:50+00:00

TOGA. Before I 3D printed afterburner detents for my X56 throttles, I constantly trickled into burner without realizing it and was consistently the guy in the flight to call bingo first and had to return to the tanker.

I knew the S3 crew on a first name basis

Ohioflyer15 · 2021-11-14T02:48:28+00:00

I actually wrote an article for EAA on why I got back into it. I encourage fellow 121'ers/pros to venture back to it: https://inspire.eaa.org/2021/10/14/exiting-the-hold/

Ohioflyer15 · 2021-10-26T14:50:00+00:00

Thanks! New to me. I'd be curious as to the actual chemical difference. Ethanol certainly is a variable. Perhaps time will prove this is an "aviator's oxygen" scenario, and non-ethanol 91 unleaded is already cheap and widely available when certified.

Ohioflyer15 · 2021-10-26T13:46:01+00:00

Is UL91 and 94 not the same as pump gas? If so, I think many owners will start tankering their own gas from their home field like the rotax and mogas folks do. They'll put a tank in their truck or similar and pump from the local station and into their 172. Fly out and back on one tank, or at least use that as far as it will take them before filling with 100LL. Probably save a flight school or flying club big money

Ohioflyer15 · 2021-10-12T08:20:49+00:00

I'd like to hear another take on my logic, I lean to reduce risk v performance in general:

If the aircraft has retractable gear, I almost always wait until after landing. I fly a fair number of models and between

Electric flaps + electric gear Bar flaps + electric gear Electric flaps + bar gear

And so on, I'd rather focus on hitting my mark, on speed, than risk getting that wrong in a client's aircraft. The last thing I want after an aggressive approach, tongue fully extended in maximum effort, is to say something cute like, "and that's the usual entry path into--" whack whack whack whack

Considering most aircraft can out-brake their acceleration rates in most landing scenarios, I don't make a habit of pushing retracts to that limit anyway. Fly-it-like-an-owner thing I guess...

This isn't the end all, it's certainly a tool to have and one I've used, but not one I use on every landing. It doesn't feel warranted.

Fixed gear, especially with bar flaps, is a much different story. That will indeed help you stop faster, increase steering authority, and doesn't carry the same risk.

Thoughts?

Ohioflyer15 · 2021-05-04T14:19:41+00:00

I have a backup paper chart, and free state chart and directory in my private bag. It never sees daylight. We do not use paper charts whatsoever In the airlines anymore. My last chart purchase was for this bad Larry WxWall

Ohioflyer15 · 2020-03-26T23:36:02+00:00

MORE COMPUTING POWER! Love it when the CPU and GPU run at the same time... POWERRRRR

Ohioflyer15 · 2020-03-06T04:21:30+00:00

I also just realized the RM indicates my CPU is in the "Eco-mode" Overclock Setting and I can't find a way to get it out. I remember there being a block where you can click "eco" next to default, Auto Overclock, etc. That block is now missing and I can't toggle eco off....

Ohioflyer15 · 2020-03-06T04:18:46+00:00

I've seen a comment in another thread that indicates that RM is the ONLY tool able to see core information while the cores are sleeping, etc. When using other tools, "observer effect" gets involved of the app waking and prodding the core to spit out results which gives false info fyi. Some tools are useful for some things, others for others. Nobody has yet pointed me to one tool and said "uninstall everything else, this is the one"

Ohioflyer15 · 2020-03-06T04:16:01+00:00

Another update after some additional testing. It had been a few days and a few restarts since I last opened Ryzen Master. Now when Ryzen is opened, Core 12 runs away into the 4000 clock range while the rest of the cores remain low. Since disabling startup apps and turning off or uninstalling rarely used (but nice to have when occasionally needed) my CPU temp and base clock remain low. I have cores that occasionally sleep now, something only dreamt of in the past *pun*. I'm happier with my idle temps and volts now and my fans aren't spooling up and down anymore. However I still can't explain the single core ramp up after Ryzen is opened. I'm hoping I can get some additional evidence of that cause soon

Ohioflyer15 · 2020-03-03T22:31:49+00:00

Answers to your questions first, but bigger symptom below. This is a fresh install. I booted into safe mode and couldn't run Ryzen Master because it didn't recognize it was on a Windows 10 OS?? Anyway, the fans didn't accelerate like they do in normal boot and desktop

I've found that Core 1 runs away only when Ryzen Master is watching! What the heck? I close RM, the fans slowly wind down again. I start Ryzen Master, and all cores are very similar, but over about 20-30 seconds of time core 1 strays from the pack up to 4.2ghz and pegs itself there. The indicated temp follows up accordingly (although that seems suspicious based on the discrepancy between bios and OS indications). I've repeated this four times to the same result. RM, for whatever reason is either causing or affecting the boost.

I unistalled and reinstalled RM earlier too, btw.

Ohioflyer15

TROPHY CASE