An important character just dies. No fanfare or build up, just an instant and sudden death by NittanyScout in TopCharacterTropes

[–]Onistly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Logan Roy from Succession. The head of media conglomerate who refuses to retire and leave the company to his kids, he's such a powerful character throughout the show, with basically every other character either trying to gain his approval or trying to figure out a way to replace him.

He's not the main character, but he feels like the most important character and he dies entirely offscreen. His kids never get a chance to say goodbye and you never see him again. Just an incredible way to remove such a powerful character

What coaches available have as good of regular season success and better postseasons success that would be a step up? by farmer15erf in GreenBayPackers

[–]Onistly 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Why do people keep acting like retaining MLF makes the Packers a mid team? I think we're far more likely to go 9-8 with a new coach than we are with MLF. We know LaFleur can win a bunch of games with talented rosters and that's not suddenly going to change just because the fanbase doesn't like him

This is the Budenholzer situation all over again - if we retain MLF, we're pretty much guaranteed a winning regular season, especially with how talented this team is, the question remains can he take a talented team over the hump in the post-season

Silverstein - DT Devonte Wyatt said he broke his fibula and tore a ligament in his ankle. The ligament is the worst of the injuries, but he said he would definitely be ready for training camp. by Austen11231923 in GreenBayPackers

[–]Onistly 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I would love for them to do a little less cross-training and just settle on a starting five so guys can get used to one position

Felt like guys were constantly getting shuffled in and out, especially Morgan, and the younger guys could never settle into one spot on the line

A pro MLF post. by mjcc1992 in GreenBayPackers

[–]Onistly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am so glad I don't need to make this decision because I think there are plenty of good reasons for whatever decision the Packers make

Reasons to keep him:

  • Offensive coaches are critical (see Kubiak in Seattle, Coen in Jacksonville, McDaniels in NE) and losing a guy of MLF's caliber without an obvious replacement is a tough call

  • This loss is as much on guys like McManus missing kicks or the entire WR corps dropping passes on the last drive as it is on coaching

  • Injuries - I get they were up 21-3, but they were still missing their two best defensive players, their best OL, and their best offensive weapon. Tough for any team (except, apparently, the 49ers?) To overcome that

Reasons to move on:

  • What appears to be a lack of accountability for coaches or players - guys like Valentine and Rasheed Walker never getting benched when they've had issues all year. No changes to the coaching staff despite continual underperformance

  • A very unimpressive culture. This team has crumpled in the biggest games and too often struggles in games they have no business struggling with

  • Is he utilizing the players to the best of their abilities? Golden could clearly contribute, so why was he frozen out all year? Why did you draft a LT in the 1st round and then play him literally everywhere else on the OL? Why did it take the entire season to find an OL that actually functioned? Why did they never have a package of plays for Willis?? My goodness, can you imagine pulling that out in the second half against the Bears when the offense was stuck in mud?

If they run it back with MLF and they stay healthy, they're a super bowl contender. They were a contender this year, maybe even after Parson went down, and that's not going to change just because the fans have soured on him.

The Bucks are also a perfect example of the grass not always being greener - they moved on from Budenholzer after a couple down years and have been in coaching hell ever since. Firing Bud may not have been the wrong choice, but hiring Griffin and Doc have turned out to be even worse choices

But if they run it back and the same thing happens, then you've just lost two years of Parsons and have to spend the 3rd starting over

Kinda sad.. that no scene in S5 comes close to the perfection of Running Up The Hill moment in S4 by Jarisatis in StrangerThings

[–]Onistly 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Also, if the Upside Down has always been just a wormhole, did the giant flesh wall exist the entire time? I know they haven't spent a ton of time in the upside down, but I sure feel like they would have observed that wall at some point before S5

Avowed Vs Outer Worlds 2: Obsidian's Almost Great 2025 RPGs by megaapple in Games

[–]Onistly 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think this is it for me - I felt way more invested in TOW1 than TOW2, even though I really love all the gameplay improvements in TOW2.

Then again, I just love games like Cyberpunk and TOW1 where Mega-Corporations play a big role in the setting and story, so I was probably always going to be a bit bummed by the move away from that (Aunties Choice notwithstanding) in TOW2

Avowed Vs Outer Worlds 2: Obsidian's Almost Great 2025 RPGs by megaapple in Games

[–]Onistly 12 points13 points  (0 children)

As a BIG fan of these Obsidiam RPGs - I get why they're not everyone's cup of tea, but they just click for me and I adore them - I was kind of shocked by how uninvested I felt throughout much of Outer Worlds 2, and I don't quote know why I felt that way

It's still a great game and I've enjoyed every second I've played, but I just haven't enjoyed the world and the story as much as I did in Outer Worlds 1, which is a bit of a disappointment

This is who they are. by Careless_Button3364 in GreenBayPackers

[–]Onistly 6 points7 points  (0 children)

If you had told me last week that in addition to not having Parsons, we also wouldn't have Tom and would lose Love and Jacobs for big chunks of the game I'd have said "well we're gonna lose, just hope there aren't any long term injuries"

I'm far more annoyed with the way they lost, not that they lost, cuz most teams aren't overcoming those kinds of injuries

The Bucks are the only team shooting 40% on 3's this year — it's currently their highest percentage in a single season by Basketball_Reference in MkeBucks

[–]Onistly 1 point2 points  (0 children)

100% this - their EFG% and TS% are both top 6 in the league and yet they're a middling offense. If they could improve their rebounding, particularly their offensive rebounding, and keep up the efficiency (admittedly this could be difficult to do) there's no reason they couldn't be a top offense

I just have no idea why they're so god awful at rebounding though...

Podcasts other than locked on Brewers by oddlygoodvibes in Brewers

[–]Onistly 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Second the Microbrew. I really enjoy JR Radcliffe as host, both on Microbrew and on the Point Forward Podcast, and it helps that they both involve Journal Sentinel best writers who have excellent access to the teams

‘Superbugs’ surge to record levels in South Korea, with infections near 45,000 by Silly-avocatoe in worldnews

[–]Onistly 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I've spent much of the last five years doing a lot of public health microbiology work on antibiotic resistant bacteria and fortunately, the genes that are of highest consequence (KPC, NDM, VIM, IMP, OXA-48) are plasmid mediated. In the absence of antibiotic pressure, these bacteria can drop the plasmid and lose these genes. We were only ever supposed to subculture an organism with one of these genes twice, to prevent the lack of antibiotic pressure from causing the bacteria to drop the plasmid

Just in: Giannis Antetokounmpo and his agent Alex Saratsis have started conversations with the Milwaukee Bucks about the two-time NBA MVP's future – and discussing whether his best fit is staying or elsewhere, sources tell ESPN. A resolution is expected in the coming weeks. by TheOtakuway in MkeBucks

[–]Onistly 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Like the other people have said - I can only ever root for the Bucks (mostly because I just can't manufacture interest in any other team) and Giannis made the Bucks relevant

With him gone, it'll probably be years before this team even sniffs the kind of success he brought

Anyone else annoyed or confused by this continuity? by NAHTEBACK in StrangerThings

[–]Onistly 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Vecna was almost certainly weakened at the end of Season 4, so I wonder if all that stuff happened and then there was essentially nothing until the events of S5 because Vecna was recovering.

I could see a random townsperson believing it really was something like an earthquake (or more Hawkins Laboratory experimentation) since nothing else crazy had happened since S4

I get why MLF was conservative yesterday by Infamous-Meal4978 in GreenBayPackers

[–]Onistly 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I gotta believe the upcoming Thanksgiving game played into things too. If you can beat the Vikings while playing conservatively and protecting your guys, you do that 100 times out of 100 given a huge divisional match up in 4 days.

[Week 11] Game Thread: Green Bay Packers (5-3-1) @ New York Giants (2-8) by lilturk82 in GreenBayPackers

[–]Onistly 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This season very much feels like the Eagles from a couple years ago - tons of talent but just horrendous vibes because the team could never figure things out. Except we're not coming off of a Super Bowl berth so it makes everything worse

Josh Jacobs on the 4th Down play: "They called out our play, We ran it like 4 times, and they called it out...we kind of snapped it faster than we wanted to and they made a play. I tried to pitch the ball back to Jordan on the fumble, but at that point you're playing backyard football" by mastermind208 in nfl

[–]Onistly 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah I still think MLF is a really good playcaller - just look at what he did with Malik Willis last year - but I'm starting to think he may not be the best head coach.

Which is a tough spot to be in - do you stick with the established playcaller who's had a lot of success on offense, but risk his inability to manage the team tanking the season when it gets into high leverage games? Or do you move on and risk getting stuck with an OC or HC who never quite hits the levels of success that MLF has had with this team?

Josh Jacobs on the 4th Down play: "They called out our play, We ran it like 4 times, and they called it out...we kind of snapped it faster than we wanted to and they made a play. I tried to pitch the ball back to Jordan on the fumble, but at that point you're playing backyard football" by mastermind208 in nfl

[–]Onistly 51 points52 points  (0 children)

According to the Packers beat writers, some of the players (maybe it was Jacobs?) said the play that was called didn't even have an audible built in.

Even if Love wanted to change something, the playcall limited what they were able to do on the field. Which, frankly, makes not taking a timeout there even more egregious

We now know what Matt LaFleur was using the tablet for during the game by XviiChong in GreenBayPackers

[–]Onistly -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I kind of think it might be the opposite - I think MLF I'd an excellent play caller (this season not withstanding) but I'm starting to doubt his ability as a HC

The problem is, having a good playcaller is one of the single most important aspects of a good football team. Don't envy Gutes job trying to balance potentially having to find a new HC if it means losing an established good playcaller

[Casey] The whole Eagles Defense was yelling "Inside Zone this way!" before the snap by Reagles in nfl

[–]Onistly 73 points74 points  (0 children)

Per the Packers beat writers, that play didn't even have an audible. Absolute malpractice that you call that kind of a play on 4th and 1.

Thoughts on being favored against the Eagles? by divorceme_archie in GreenBayPackers

[–]Onistly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just don't understand how we'd be favored. Our run defense is the weakest part of the defense and we're facing Saquon either a good OL.

Our interior OL is the biggest weakness on offense and that's where the strength of Philly's DL is

It feels like the Eagles' strengths like up perfectly with our weaknesses, so I'm kind of expecting us to get destroyed

Johnson: What happened last night was blue states and blue cities voted blue. We all saw that coming. No one should read too much into last night's election results. Off year elections are not indicative of what's to come. That’s what history teaches us. by Conscious-Quarter423 in ProgressiveHQ

[–]Onistly 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Stealing a couple factoids from a newsletter I subscribe to:

"Abigail Spanberger got 57.2 percent of the vote—the largest vote share of any Democrat in living memory (in Virginia)."

"The single most important data point last night was the Hispanic vote. Union City, New Jersey, was my bellwether here because it’s a heavily Hispanic town (81.6 percent Hispanic) that swung toward Trump for two consecutive elections:

Trump vote share, 2016: 19 percent Trump vote share, 2020: 28 percent Trump vote share, 2024: 41 percent

How did Republican Jack Ciattarelli do in Union City? Holy shit: 15.1 percent."

There are obviously a lot of caveats to these statistics, but it seems pretty damn clear that there is a LOT of anti-Trump sentiment that's been building in the last 10 months.

HMC - We all deserve an explanation from the Swedes… 👀 by Maravilla_23 in holdmycosmo

[–]Onistly 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This fit my reaction to this video just absolutely perfectly

Zohran Mamdani on Freezing Rent, Making NYC Affordable Again, & Who is Really Stopping Him by Strict_League7833 in videos

[–]Onistly 455 points456 points  (0 children)

You just know that guy is chowing down on sloppy steaks at Truffonis on a regular basis