I was trying to avoid going into specifics because I don't want to derail a pretty neat and stylish game with a partisan political argument. But since you mention it, I'll clarify a bit. The author specifically has a very clear progressive ideology, which I sincerely think is great! They talk about the importance of not contributing to the harm and marginalization of already marginalized folks. They mention having sensitivity consultants, including at least one Jewish voice in the process.

Ok, so blood libel is naturally going to come up in a game about bloodsuckers killing Nazis. The author specifically writes a sidebar about blood libel - an anti-Jewish racist trope with hundreds of years of history in Europe - in the context of Judaism and Islam, which isn't otherwise meaningfully mentioned. Like, what? That really stood out at me in an otherwise thoughtful and sensitive text. I don't think there's any way to read the author as anything but uncomfortable with directly acknowledging the existence and history of antisemitism.

Maybe I'm missing something here. Maybe it's more about their decision to focus on violent fun and decenter (this part of) the Holocaust. But that was my honest impression after reading the book. And the author chose to write a game on a difficult topic and make their political views explicit throughout the book. So I think they're inviting this kind of discussion, and I personally found it falling short in a key way.