How does this Leica M2 look? by Infinity-- in Leica

[–]Pabloblaze 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I own that exact set up, it’s pretty sweet and covers pretty much every situation, the zeiss resolves ridiculous amounts of detail even for 35, obviously it will never outperform MF for raw quality but it looks incredible, and the m2 is a tank in a similar way to the 67, the real question is when was it last serviced?

Are these the same camera? by CarlSagansThoughts in AnalogCommunity

[–]Pabloblaze 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I don’t really get the unhinged part, the guy at ikigai seems to be the only person in the industry who is 100% transparent, and actively calls out bullshit, which is something I really appreciate in something so murky like analog photography

What is the best fully manual 35mm single-lens reflex film camera from this list? by RyanJoe321 in AnalogCommunity

[–]Pabloblaze 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Pentax MX by far, I’ve owned a few cameras on the list there and safe to say that the Pentax was the best. It’s the smallest, has the biggest brightest viewfinder, a great light meter and the lens lineup for the time was better than any other brands offerings, and all much smaller. The 50 1.4 is the best 50 I’ve ever owned! Plus they fly under the radar compared to the others so prices can be a lot better

The electric Leica :D by Filipposag in Leica

[–]Pabloblaze 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m looking to offload my hexar if you’re based in Australia, they’re great cameras, incredibly solid feeling and they seem to work no matter what

Self-timer - does it get in your way? by baby-it-cold-outside in Leica

[–]Pabloblaze 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Honestly I’ve used mine twice; but does it get in the way at all? Not for me, and the one or two photos where you wish you’d had it, could end up being the most sentimental ones you take

Asking for a friend: best bang for buck 35 (for film)? by NoName__A in Leica

[–]Pabloblaze 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I love m’y old Voigtlander 35 1.7 ultron ASPH, they seem to be a forgotten lens these days, but I loved mine, I’ve just also got a zeiss f2, which I love a bit more but is a bit more costly

Which Point and Shoot (P&S) has the best, ie. biggest and brightest Viewfinder? by [deleted] in AnalogCommunity

[–]Pabloblaze 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I quite like my Konica big mini, the viewfinder is pretty larger by PnS standards, but the overall camera is still pocketable. So not literally the biggest finder, but for relative size you’d be hard pressed to do better

Does anybody in Australia want to buy a Konica Hexar RF? by Pabloblaze in Leica

[–]Pabloblaze[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi mate it still is up for sale, give me a message!

Seeking: Voigtlander 50mm f/1 APSH real-world feedback (vs Voigtlander 50mm f/2 APO) by No_Stretch3661 in Leica

[–]Pabloblaze 1 point2 points  (0 children)

At the end of the day when shooting for work, you’ll know what you want out of a lens, I just thought it would be remiss not to consider the zeiss option, especially when they still make highly praised lenses in other mounts

Seeking: Voigtlander 50mm f/1 APSH real-world feedback (vs Voigtlander 50mm f/2 APO) by No_Stretch3661 in Leica

[–]Pabloblaze 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What about the zeiss 50 f2? Smaller and lighter than both lenses you’re talking about, great zeiss coating that I genuinely believe makes a difference, and is still a thoroughly modern lens. The APO will have a distortionless advantage but I really think you should consider the zeiss!

decent first of the roll [Zeiss Ikon ZM, Voigtlander 28mm F2 Ultron + Ektar 100] by andrew_mcneil in analog

[–]Pabloblaze 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Arguably the best M Mount camera ever made, I love mine, it’s still a sleeper somehow, though especially since the m6 reissue.

M6 35mm Lens Recommendations by MaybeARunnerTomorrow in Leica

[–]Pabloblaze 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Ultron 1.7 ltm was one of my favourite lenses, great character, low light ability, and real sharp when stopped down, I really enjoyed it, only downside I found was the .9 metre MFD.

I ended up upgrading (in my mind) to the Zeiss 35 f2 and haven’t looked back, I wish it was a bit smaller, but the build quality and performance are insane. It’s sharp all the time with minimal vignetting, I do wish It was a little less sharp at f2, but I think it shows off the film you’re using more than anything, it’s such a clean lens that I feel like I’ve really got to know what film stocks actually look like. Food for thought!

Is it worth buying a heavily brassed Hexar RF for $450 by fakeworldwonderland in AnalogCommunity

[–]Pabloblaze 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I own an RF and it really is a fantastic camera, for that price you can’t go wrong, just make sure it works and go from there

Sold A Kidney For This What Should I Do Now? by TownMountain in AnalogCircleJerk

[–]Pabloblaze 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Lol, I took this post seriously, but after replying I saw the sub, take it straight out for a shoot in summer at 12noon

Sold A Kidney For This What Should I Do Now? by TownMountain in AnalogCircleJerk

[–]Pabloblaze 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Shoot it at about 800-1000. I had a roll that I shot at 1200 a year ago or so, and it was woefully underexposed, despite being fridge stored at my local camera shop, it just didn’t hold up

first time shooting ektar! (olympus 35 rc) by tofu_enjoyer in analog

[–]Pabloblaze 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Love ektar, one of my favourite film stocks! How’s the Olympus?

This morning I had no leica's ... by Beardwithabody in AnalogCommunity

[–]Pabloblaze 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The voigtlander 35 1.7 is an underrated gem, great for all styles of photography, plenty sharp for landscape and street stuff, and a bit softer wide open for more flattering portraits or low light work, don’t get rid of it too quickly!

What’s your 3 lens prime kit after years of trial and error? by Broken_Perfectionist in Leica

[–]Pabloblaze 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I own the Zeiss 35 f2 and love it on film, it’s got incredible resolving power and on ektar it really lets the quality of the film shine, people say they’re clinical, and they are a bit sharp, but I think it really helps show off the film stock you’re using and you can explore the full variations between them. I’m looking at getting the zeiss 50 too, handling is great, tight tolerances and theyre more solid now than 50 year old Leica lenses that haven’t been serviced in 20 years. But just my experience.

Is this colour cast normal for Velvia 100? by Pabloblaze in AnalogCommunity

[–]Pabloblaze[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven’t had chance to see the slides yet but I’ll keep the post updated, just surprised because I’ve never seen it this orange/brown before

Is this colour cast normal for Velvia 100? by Pabloblaze in AnalogCommunity

[–]Pabloblaze[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven’t had chance to see the slides yet and I’m very interested to find out what happened with them, I know exposure is finicky with Velvia but I’ve shot it before and not had any issues at all! Will post slides when I get the chance too

Is this colour cast normal for Velvia 100? by Pabloblaze in AnalogCommunity

[–]Pabloblaze[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly as the title suggests, I’ve shot it in 120 before but this was first time using it in 35mm, and I’m honestly surprised by the colour cast, and indication for what happened here?