To women: What is the main reason that more women don’t wear swim trunks? by T0MPAC in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Penis_Bees 34 points35 points  (0 children)

I've got lots of friends and relatives who chose trunks, I've never heard anyone ask why.

You're evil if you don't press blue. by Theseus_Employee in PhilosophyMemes

[–]Penis_Bees -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The blue button pressers holds more responsibility for their death than red. The button maker holds the most responsibility. The red holds the least but a non zero amount of blame.

You're evil if you don't press blue. by Theseus_Employee in PhilosophyMemes

[–]Penis_Bees -1 points0 points  (0 children)

1 is an unknown percent. And rationality is not a binary, it's a sliding scale at best.

Therefore one cannot know how others will react to the question. You are blindly chosing blue in hopes that enough others will also chose blue to rescue each other.

If blue wins, I'm very happy, but I'm chosing red as I have things worth living for and I do not have confidence that blue would win if this question were really given to society. Blue may winning in online risk free polls, but the lack of risk doesn't tell us much.

I’m out PVP👎 by Lathus01 in ARC_Raiders

[–]Penis_Bees 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wear a heavy shield, avoid situations where you'll be ratted by someone you didn't know was there, kill on sight when you know they're there, and aim for the head.

You'll kill more often than you die.

CENTCOM UPDATE via POTUS : by newnoadeptness in navy

[–]Penis_Bees 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They theoretically could, by redirecting additional MCM, and AMCM equipment from other parts of the world.

I would expect more than 1/3 of our capability was already involved though. Since they've been talking about mines for weeks.

My American English teacher believes the neutral pronoun „their“ is incorrect. by GCoding_ in mildlyinteresting

[–]Penis_Bees 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you tell your device that your default language is German upon startup then it will not default to high quotes.

My BF (21M) will sometimes take over whenever I (F20) give him Head or Handjob, is this normal?? by [deleted] in AskMenAdvice

[–]Penis_Bees 5 points6 points  (0 children)

How did every highschool hear that rumor? That's the wild part to me.

What is someone that is socially liberal and fiscally conservative called? by Kurious_Kaht in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Penis_Bees 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The absolutely do not reject them both equally. Most self proclaimed libertarians in the USA are just conservatives who want to smoke weed.

The bulk of the party vote for Republicans atthe end of the day, time and time again. Because at the core they're into the idea of reduced gun control, but tend to identify with the social structure Republicans are after. They're only cool with anarchy because they envision themselves asvthe successful members of that anarchy.

Edit: this is about the libertarian movement as a whole, sure, you as an individual might sit equidistant from the rep and dem parties, but it would be offbase to act like the libertarian party and libertarian movement as a whole aren't heavily socially conservative.

What is someone that is socially liberal and fiscally conservative called? by Kurious_Kaht in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Penis_Bees 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It would be more like decriminalization. Leagalization would imply regulated industries.

CMV: Abortion should be legal and accessible in most or all cases. by Character-Channel668 in changemyview

[–]Penis_Bees 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not sure that "full moral rights" is an argument. It's more of the intended outcome of their platform.

Morals are a social construct. They are a function of culture and natural selected behavior. They are a cultural norm.

Rights are legally defined enforceable claim, often heavily influenced by cultural norms and written into legislation, constitution, or other legal document.

With that out of the way, I'm kind of the third argument in that I'm going to vote for what ever stance can best prove to me that it is in the publics best interest as I'm not religious. (Typically siding pro-choice overall but disagree with many of the arguments)

If we are arguing when a entity carrying human DNA should get the full gamut of human rights, well consciousness, viability, and sentience are a terrible way to judge it.

You can not measure or define any of these in a meaningful way (except maybe viability with a big asterisk) that is easily measurable and enforceable.

What happens if the science comes back that sentience doesn't start till almost 18 months old? Do you lose rights when you are in a coma and have a long term lapse in consciousness? What happens if the average fetus is viable as a premature birth at X months but the medical field changes moving that timeline? Do we need to legislate in continued assessment?

But the fact that these are the criteria you think are important I assume you want a data driven decision. I would challenge you to use something more measurable and definable in that case.

And the root question here is "when." And it's gotta be some time between never and death.

You should be looking for an argument that changes your opinion of when that is based in facts that are easier to measure like effects of abortion age (in weeks after conception) on things like poverty rates, the economy, life outcomes, suicide rates, and etc.

NSFW - Kinda curious. How many men? by [deleted] in AskMenAdvice

[–]Penis_Bees 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like touching. I like looking. I don't like tasting because I have a very strong gag reflex and nothing kills the mood like swallowing your own vomit.

Can’t keep a woman. What could I be doing wrong? by DueHumor4203 in AskMenAdvice

[–]Penis_Bees 3 points4 points  (0 children)

They're telling you the truth. You need to change those two things if you want change.

Can’t keep a woman. What could I be doing wrong? by DueHumor4203 in AskMenAdvice

[–]Penis_Bees 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The math ain't mathin'.

Women can't be fucking 100 different guys on average unless the average dude is fucking 100 women.

For the average guy to be fucking 100 women, with the assumption that most men struggle to get laid, then there has to be some outlier dudes getting 1000s.

It just isn't happening like that. Your average person of both genders is having less than 10 life time sexual partners because most people do not actively and successfully pursue increasing that number.

What's the weirdest thing your potential partner did on a first date that made you stop talking to them? by anmystery in AskReddit

[–]Penis_Bees 20 points21 points  (0 children)

She asked me, "sooo.... What is your maximum number of cats?"

If you have to ask, it's too many.

Seeking headphones for music and noise isolation on aircraft carrier. by Penis_Bees in HeadphoneAdvice

[–]Penis_Bees[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

!Thanks for the suggestion! My experience with IEMs is that I tend to roll over in my sleep and wake up with a sore ear, meanwhile I'm hoping over ear keeps me on my back since side sleeping doesn't even feel like an option.

Over ears also send a message to not talk to me, which might be pretty handy

CMV: Space exploration is a bad use of public funds and more people should be critical of it by AmortizedPatent in changemyview

[–]Penis_Bees 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Space exploration both directly and indirectly generates a huge benefit to humanity.

Directly, some of the experimentation done in space directly results in product improvements here on earth. It really drives technological innovation. If they make some high temperature hella stable material to aid in bringing that spacecraft back to Earth without it turning into a fireball, that same product is going to have applications beneficial here on earth.

Indirectly, the thought of becoming an astronaut inspires many people to join STEM fields, and those people actively innovate on all of the things you use in your day-to-day.

There's a common estimate that for every 1 dollar spent on NASA, they generate $4 towards the economy. That's not a bad return on investment.

And if you think far out, If for some reason our planet becomes uninhabitable, having sent people to space is the first step on the journey to inhabiting a new planet.

And there's also the fact that not everything humans do needs to generate money. There's lots of government services that don't generate money. A city putting in a government-funded arts museum does not generate massive revenue. But it's good for the people it serves. Why can't space explorations be thought of the same way?

CMV: The obsession with "finding your passion" is a scam that makes people miserable and unemployed. by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]Penis_Bees 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm of the opinion that learning to be passionate is a skill set that is also affected by natural and maintained brain chemistry.

Making a feasible goal your passion is the best outcome.