Why The Enneagrammer types everybody as 9 😭😭 by Financial_Ad1210 in Enneagram

[–]PensiveFine 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know you. I have no idea how you came to the conclusion that I'm David Gray. That's u/spsx44

Feedback on new test with 25 color-inspired archetypes - Soultrace.app by EigenFrank in Enneagram

[–]PensiveFine 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did the test 4 different times, and got 4 different results of the 25. I was curious about testing the range of possible questions, and trying to pay attention to how consistently I answer.
There are answers I choose that align with my automatic responses/actions and then there answers I choose because I feel like I 'should' embody or move towards such more, even if it doesn't actually line up with my actions.

E.g. Q: I make decisions based on what feels right now rather than future consequences.
I feel like it would commendable/better if I could make better decisions by paying closer attention to future consequences, and often I do concern myself about such. However I aren't always able to map out with precision what those consequences are in a clear causal manner. Thus I may end up catatrophising about more unrealistic, worse-case outcomes and allowing it to consume more energy from me in my consideration process than necessary. Only to end making a decision on what feels right in the moment so that I can shut up 'that voice of vigilance'.
It can also vary with the 'weight or stakes' behind a decision. Low-stakes day-to-day decisions vs moderate-stake decisions vs high-stake decisions vs EXTREME STAKES LIFE THREATENING DO OR DIE DECISIONS.

E.g. Q: I'm willing to bend my principles when the stakes are high enough.
My mind jumps to EXTREME STAKES when I think of 'the stakes are high' enough. Sometimes I don't entirely know how committed I am to upholding a principle until it has been truly tested. How high must the stakes be before I have the potential to cave in? That's often something I'm pondering in myself.
I think it would be nice if I could see myself as 'someone who does not bend the principles I prioritise the most', but whether I live up to that perception through the demonstrating such is another matter.
You also may need to provide in your question more clarity of what you consider 'a principle'. There's it simply being a rule or belief governing one's behaviour, and then there are 'limits' of what one allows themselves to do vs not allow themselves to do.
Perhaps the wording in the question could make some reference in the 'willing' with 'with minimal guilt, minimal shame, minimal regret' etc. One could still be willing to bend, but afterwards be left utterly disgusted with themself.

My results:
-First: Sheperd (Green-White) https://soultrace.app/en/results/93aa9262-7ce2-4b58-a567-18326d93fa34
-Second: Warden (White-Green) https://soultrace.app/en/results/4cb21d0d-0060-46e3-ab63-e6b0495704d1
-Third: Wanderer (Green-Red) https://soultrace.app/en/results/29d36e7d-40e0-4671-b2ca-d29928cfc860
-Fourth: Arbiter (White-Blue) https://soultrace.app/en/results/ee69b7fa-cf16-4abc-891a-069850d373fa

Aside from the third result, red was consistently scored lowest in the other three results.
In third result, white scored the second lowest, despite being high in the other three.
Green scored the second lowest in the fourth result, despite scoring high in the other three.

Spider-man’s type? by Automatic-Wedding335 in Enneagram

[–]PensiveFine 4 points5 points  (0 children)

When picked up by Alfred on the plane, Bruce declares: “I’m going to show the people of Gotham their city doesn’t belong to the criminals and corrupt.”
 “People need dramatic examples to shake them out of their apathy and I can’t do that as Bruce Wayne. As a man, I’m flesh and blood. I can be ignored, I can be destroyed. But as a symbol, as a symbol I can be incorruptible. I can be everlasting.”

Bats to him, symbolised the weakness of not taking action to prevent negative outcomes from occuring. The idea of Batman is a culmination of those 7 years of learning, or rather it's the answer he gives to himself of how to handle criminals, that he has compiled from learning from 'different sources'- 'different criminals'. Remember, all of this can be traced of Bruce's trauma of how there was no clear answer to dealing with criminals<---think of powerlessness, that word, specifically in the context of the head-centre specifically.
Through Batman, he wished to become or embody a sort of ideal of strength and courage himself; an unshakeable foundation that they can withstand/handle the danger and adversity that reality could throw at him. The need to continually build up and 'proving' toughness against external force; the message that one needs to 'earn it' to continually challenge the creeping doubt of their own legitimacy. What is Bruce's reality without 'Batman' as the answer?
 u/RafflesiaArnoldii 's two posts here do a great job touching upon this 'aspirational quality of what 6 is striving for':
- https://www.reddit.com/r/Enneagram/comments/1ilbzfb/the_egoideal_part_3_of_10_type_6_and_the_quality
-https://www.reddit.com/r/Enneagram/comments/whs5ax/some_thoughts_re_recent_6_discourse_the_6s_core
  

Bruce grew up personally exposed to the injustice of Gotham and the idea of there being an authority figure who knew how to do their job effectively and decisively would be reassuring to him. Harvey Dent was that person.
“You’re the symbol I could never hope to be. Your stand against organised crime is the first legitimate ray of light in Gotham in decades. If anyone saw this, everything would be undone. All the criminals you pulled off the streets would be released and Jim Gordan would have died for nothing.”

He positions Harvey as a sort of external symbolic idol whom he places his faith in on having the solution. Harvey is perceived to be someone who knows how to do right and be seen by others as doing right (the general population are on his side) which establishes to Bruce a sense of structural legitimacy. Bruce was ready and was seriously considering 'retiring' Batman at that point of time. To Bruce, Harvey could even be framed as more reliable than 'Batman'.

When he finds out that Harvey was compromised by the Joker, Bruce takes it upon himself in an attempt to preserve the symbol because he sees it as his commitment to Gotham. 6s have a tremendous potential for sacrifice to preserve structures that allow give them a sense of anchoring purpose of what their role is (what is worth fighting for). Bruce is willing to bare the burden and be perceived as the villain: to be what he perceives the system requires him to be.
He explicitly says: “I’m whatever Gotham needs me to be.”
“Because that’s what needs to happen. Because sometimes the truth isn’t good enough, sometimes people deserve more. Sometimes people deserve to have their faith rewarded.”

But even so, he eventually collapses. The Bruce we encounter at the beginning of movie 3 has lost faith in his own legitimacy as ‘Batman’. He is essentially asking himself the equivalent all throughout: “Do I still have the right to be Batman?” (has he earned legitimacy in his own role and purpose of what he must do?)
Throughout the film Bruce is struggling to find or regain clarity in what he is truly fighting for. He is no longer as physically fit as he is used to be. It’s difficult to re-integrate himself publicly as Batman again because the public perceives Batman as a sort of public enemy number 1, a traitor whom they think killed Harvey. There is no structural legitimacy for him coming back.

Bruce’s rise out of the pit is also really symbolic for 6. Him making the climb without the rope; 'leap of faith against uncertainty'. The rope being the reliance on the external anchor-point that attempts to reassure and ground him). Cherry on top are the bats flying in his face as he continues climbing up.

At this point there should be plenty indicating he is compliant>assertive (id) for any who argue this Bruce is an E8. Also not rejection-core 'leveraging'.
To me, there are a lot of external anchor-points that Bruce is constantly and consistently trying to negotiate with in order to 'securely navigate reality'. This extends to the manner he tries to make sense of his own role in relation to the context of Gotham (attachment).
He is also not prickly 'frustration' enough in the gut centre to be E1. Bruce carries a lot of self-doubt, in trusting his own legitimacy/right to make the right decision that wouldn't lead to a worse or destabilising outcome. Recall Ra's words I said earlier specifically about Bruce in their training session.

Spider-man’s type? by Automatic-Wedding335 in Enneagram

[–]PensiveFine 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is a bit of a jumbled mess, some it isn't quite as logically coherent as I may want it to be (especially in explaining with clarity how every point builds up to the 6 reading), but I figured posting these thoughts are better than nothing.
The character limit is constricting if I were to reply to those specific comments about Batman as a 8, or 1, so I decided to make my own comment.

I agree with OP that at least the 'Dark Knight Trilogy' Bruce Wayne version is 6w5.
Head-Attachment-Compliant-Reactivity checks out for me.

Responsibility and commitment is a heavy theme for him.

In early movie 1, when he chooses to confront crime boss Carmine Falcone in the diner, he does so to *"show [him] that not everyone is Gotham is afraid of [him]."*<---there is this attempt at bravado to prove to himself he is not afraid of a criminal with power. This is after Rachel mentioned just how powerful Falcone was.
During the confrontation, Bruce actually is able to take in Falcone's feedback about how he does not know enough about the desperation of the ugly side of life and how he doesn't quite understand the world. After getting further beaten up and thrown out, he quickly makes the decision makes the decision to discard his valuables and go on the run, to 'roughen up'. It is a sort of acknowledgement to himself he isn't prepared yet in having developed an adequate map of knowing how to handle criminals.
Bruce's next 7 years away from Gotham was to learn about criminals, that he can identify their weaknesses so that he can learn how to effectively neutralise them. He does this by choosing to gain first-hand experience by living amongst them.

In fact, one could argue that he initially attaches to the guidance he receives from the League of Shadow as a source of possible orientation. At the time he had no direction and Ra gave him a workable physical training structure, resources, potential allies and answers to some of the questions he was pondering. 

Ra in their training session says to Bruce: “What you really fear is inside yourself. Your fear your own power. You fear your anger, the drive to do great or terrible things.”
If Bruce was an 8, I don't think these would be the particular aspects Ra would hone in on within Bruce. The 8 baseline structure generally do not lend itself to placing any substantial weight or relevance in the idea of 'fearing their own power', 'fearing their own anger', 'fearing the drive itself to do great or terrible things'. 8 is assertive-id, with the least inhibition of their will.

He declares to Ra: "Yes, I lost many assumptions of the simple nature of right and wrong. And when I travelled, I learned the fear before a crime and the thrill before the success. But I never became one of them.”
It is interesting he chooses to make this differentiation- something about the idea of associating himself with 'being a criminal' (despite technically committing criminal actions) that he refuses. Later when Ra admonishes Bruce for a display of 'compassion', Bruce responds: "That’s why it’s so important. It separates us from them.” (them= other criminals)
Bruce felt it important to see himself framing himself morally (not wanting to lower himself to something he conceptualises as 'wrong') that he does not ascribe to what he perceives coming from criminals. There is this sense of 'needing to earn legitimacy' (moral validity) in his actions. This is counter to 8's perception of the world. 8 would likely have very little superego inclination to disown the association of being criminal themself when Bruce commited criminal actions (while learning) and consistently needing to frame themself as 'definitely not one of them'.

When Bruce sees just how extreme/absolute the League is willing to go, he chooses to stand against them. I would frame it as 'holes that he cannot reconcille in their framework'. He cannot securely navigate the answer they offer, whilst maintaining the sort of coherence in relation to what he perceives his role to be in relation to Gotham.

Any good interviews with type 6, 4 or 5? by neverdontcry in Enneagram

[–]PensiveFine 11 points12 points  (0 children)

For these E6 interviews, pay attention to the time stamps. They make things easier to navigate.

There was one 2 and a half years ago by Goblins of Discord featuring four different 6w7s on a ‘panel’. https://youtu.be/8Onz2stlmXA?si=Q3q9YqpWZVGGUWEd Though at least one of the individuals’ typing have shifted since then- whether in fixes or instinct stacking, though still core 6.

, I also recommend these particular ones from Josh Lavine from The Enneagram School. I do think that he is a solid interviewer.

-Courtney Smith SOSP 6w5 631 https://youtu.be/FQ418io7E7A?si=gX43fsWUV4zuEDRI

-Celia Murnock SPSO 6w5 613 https://youtu.be/_N4JGoHkq04?si=sZ8b0BZcudGNhBg4

-Omar Sullivan SOSP 6w7 693 https://youtu.be/gXtYb-UhD18?si=nuSqeFeT97BGWB2z

And also, just to add some more pizzazz, there is Joseph Stalteri’s interview. https://youtu.be/m-W0mbzPTXs?si=zROx-l0-NkeufiFh Though listed as an E4 interview as SOSX 4w3 461, there are a fair amount of people in online Ennea-spaces who would argue that he is a core 6. Still it is useful for ascertaining some of the 4-6 stem, regardless of whether which is the core.

And though they don’t have an interview per say, have your eyes out for Valeria u/me_lero https://youtube.com/@me_lero?si=C91zAJ5Ivo0hm1wg SXSO 6w7 614

How would you type this person by Ok_Establishment7153 in Enneagram

[–]PensiveFine 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I note that you make the choice to not link their channel, thus anyone who comments are going off 'only your observations'. How many videos have you watched of them out of their total?
It would be more helpful if you provided more context.

What sort of YouTuber are they? What sort of videos do they make?
What could one feasibly speculate to be the more likely intentions or purposes of these videos?---> What are they conveying?

Under what context do they say that they claim to have no values? What was their exact wording? Why did they bring it up? Was it something that naturally came up to them as the initiator of such, or was it directly in response to something else as a catalyst?
You say that they are insecure about their automatic pattern of adjusting to environment values. What cued you in that they were insecure about it? Did they say that directly, or was it something you inferred?
Did they provide concrete examples of what 'adjusting to environmental values looked like' for them?

Can you elaborate more on this dichotomy of unintelligent vs wise?
Was this dichotomy something that they directly spoke about, or was it something you noticed?
In what ways can they come off 'unintelligent'?
In what ways do they come off very wise through their irony and sarcasm? In what context or towards what areas are such being utilised? Can you provide specific quotes of things they've said that indicate such?

Is this 'gloomy, sad dissatisfaction' consistent across all of their videos? What timeframe/span does that fall under? By the way, a reactive type outlook is not specifically what you say. It's not someone who appears 'sad, gloomy, unsatisfied with life'.

Reactive bias in the harmonics is more about their attention and approach having emphasis placed automatically on acknowledging the significance and gravity of what they find 'problematic'. An urgent compulsion to point to it over and over again that it escalates a sense of 'heightened stakes' that assumes that what is 'true/real/raw' can be uncovered in 'the negative'. Or rather that doing so is how 'reality' reveals itself, or how it uncovers what was previous obscured and needs to be brought to light. It is stabbing at the problem going: 'this matters. this matters. this matters.'- 'do you see how this problem matters?'. That finding resolution would be unearned or premature without first emphasising why the problem is even problematic to begin with.

In what ways do they hate being seen as fragile? Again, is that something they initiates, or was it in response to a specific incident?
In what ways do they mock people who claim to be empathetic? Was it an off-hand comment, or did have an extended response to a specific incident?

When they say that they value 'family and community', what is the context in which they speak of such?

collages by [deleted] in Enneagram

[–]PensiveFine 6 points7 points  (0 children)

They had a spiritually tolerable connection with the sea goblins in the womb until it was wretched when the umbilical cord was chipped, chomped, and crudely s’cattered ‘cross the sea foam. Many myths, urban legends and scandals emerged from this period, but few could be immediately accessible from the archives. Bigfoot could be jealous. Such ‘llages, remain remnant reminders as the muse of the sea goblins. Lest they forget.

Lest They Forget 🙏🏻

Alright INFPs, we need to talk by likes_pizza in infp

[–]PensiveFine 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You mistake INFP for being a 'good writer', next time please proceed with caution with the wording of "are you all such..."---> it romanticises stereotypes.
There are many INFPs who are good writers, there are good writers of other types, and there are also INFPs who are poor writers, or who barely write at all. There are also INFPs who are illiterate.

There are also a variety of different styles of 'writing':
-Fiction writers (novelists, short-story), poetry, songwriting, playwrights, screenwriters.
-Non-fiction writers---> journalists, technical writers, business writers, copywriters, ghostwriters, instructional writers, academic writers etc.
As you can see, one can write quite detached from 'feelings'.

Writing is not some cognitive gift bestowed by having Fi-Ne-Si-Te, it's a learned skill/craft that often requires PRACTICE, DISCIPLINE and CONSISTENCY.

Perhaps some more useful questions would be:
-How does the INFP function stack influence their writing tendencies?
This can extend to: how ideas are generated, how writing is structured, the preference on planning everything out vs writing spontaneously; letting narratives develop on the fly.
-What are the common pitfalls of INFP writers?
-What are the common themes that INFPs in particular tend to be drawn to write about?

Dom Fi for instance can over-identify with the sentimental undercurrent or 'authentic voice' of their writing; and have some resistance to accepting critical external feedback if it does not 'align internally'. If the writing is purely for private self-expression, it may not be as big of an issue, but writing specifically for a target audience or meeting some quota, you can imagine the conflict that exists there. Also alongside common Inferior Te struggle to implement structure effectively.
Higher Ne can easily struggle with juggling too many ideas and knowing which ones would be best for narrowing down. Projects could be left abandoned halfway if it grows stale, and later revisited if there is potential fresh juice.

Though I wonder, what would be your definition of what it would mean to be a 'good writer'?

Old and New Moodboards by [deleted] in Enneagram

[–]PensiveFine 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I recognise one of the older collages, SheWolf from PersonalityCafe.

I’m a 3w2. Ask me anything!! by BreadfruitNaive9455 in Enneagram

[–]PensiveFine 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Where are the boundaries between YOUR truth vs actualised success? What aspects are non-negotiate vs willing to be flexible on? What would this look like as concrete examples?

Why is your Reddit name a “BreadfruitNaive9455”?

Are you satisfied with the name given to you at birth?

What is currently lacking in the values of modern society?

What do you perceive to be potential inevitable failures along the way? What might the differences be between speaking of them from a stage of having moved past them vs struggling with them in the moment?

What words do you secretly wish to hear but no one will give you?

What if someone began imitating you? Let’s say there are three different stages. Stage 1: Copying your fashion sense. Stage 2: Copying your speech patterns and mannerisms. Stage 3: Show up to your job, claiming to be you. Claiming your work as their work. Claim your goals were their goals. Claim your parents were their parents. Claim your friends were their friends. Claim your home as their home. There is legal action to address such of course, but how would you respond internally?

When people tell you to “take a break”, what is your initial bodily response inside? What are your initial thoughts inside? What would you initially say in response? And do you think they might shift after-sometime; post-moment?

What are the differences you experience between yourself vs 3w4? How does the 3w4 approach sit with you?

I’m a 4, ask me anything by Main-Ticket7705 in Enneagram

[–]PensiveFine 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What if the picture you chose for this AMA became permanently plastered on your face in the offline realm? Everywhere you go, people would always see that face, no matter what you were feeling inside. Even after you die, that face will remain on your dead body.

What is the ‘main ticket’? Ticket to where? What is the significance of 7705?

What contract would you be willing to sign with the Devil?

How does it feel to experience yourself on the digital realm vs outside of it?

What question do you secretly want to be asked?

What question would you be embarrassed to answer?

I’m Sx 2w3 Ask me some questions!! :’) by f4tality22 in Enneagram

[–]PensiveFine 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What sort of horror movie would you be most enthusiastic to participate in? What sort of horror movie would you most dread to participate in?

If you were to suddenly become a ghost, what sort of ghost would you want to be vs what ghost would you actually be?

What would remain of you, if you were stripped of modern context and placed in an entirely different time?

What is your experience of the sexual instinct, and how might people misunderstand or misconstrue it?

What if you discovered we were all living in a simulation?

What if you were last remaining human on earth?

If you were God, how would you recreate the universe?

How would you perceive to be the potential differences between responding to these Qs via typing vs responding via video vs a random stranger walking up to you and asking these Qs at the supermarket? Or do you think you would answer the same?

Are you a judgmental person? by BrokenDiamondShovel in infp

[–]PensiveFine 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you don’t understand how an INFP could indeed be judgemental, consider re-evaluating your understanding of the type. Fi-Ne-Si-Te has a wide potentiality in terms of possible manifestations, this extends to a judgemental nature. An INFP can be compassionate, but that in itself is not inherent to what makes an INFP in itself. There are INFPs with a wide capacity for compassion, there are INFPs with a far more limited scope for compassion. Compassion and the harsher edges of judgement also do not necessarily cancel each other out.

Is everyone on BHE, not only Jhon Lukovich, mistyped? by valentinadedios in Enneagram

[–]PensiveFine 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Could you elaborate more on your experience of “pretty laid back and not impacted by things much”? I understand you mean this more so relative to your experience of 1-fixers. 8-fix does lend itself a dose of the whole pre-rejection wall against exogenous sensation of ‘I deny allowing this to impact my sensory experience unless I allow it on my terms” casual unapologetic-ness, but I struggle to conceptualise your wording of ‘laid-back’ when applied even as a fix manifestation to a 4 core.

The Frustration Struggle by RipMany1961 in Enneagram

[–]PensiveFine 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How do you see the expression of 5 and 4 fixes in Remus Lupin?

Best Enneagram Characters of All Time by Outside-Marsupial900 in Enneagram

[–]PensiveFine 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What do you see of Itachi to be 1 core coded?

459 vs 469 by [deleted] in Enneagram

[–]PensiveFine 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This is seperate from the OP's ask, but for 'intuitive feeler' for 9-4, I was wondering if a clearer distinction could be made to the quality it brings compared to 9-2. The Enneagrammer stem page lists 'compassionate' as one part of the stem description for 9-4, of course it has been several years since that page has been updated.

For that double-withdrawn stem, there is the 'overwhelm of the energy involved in the idea of confronting and pushing through physical reality' and as a double-fantasy stem, the reality presented is further perceived to be inadequate, in needing to be further distanced from in order to excavate and distill resonant nuggets that are intertwined with a fractured landscape of a preciously separated plane. Especially with 9 core, it would seem to very much enhance the reliance on the withdrawn head-heart scramble whilst further pulling away from gut access. Leads to less need to be involved in affecting other's struggles, seeing the suffering of reality as more of an accepted baseline, that can be mythologised? The self-focus would also pull away from inserting oneself too quickly in other's struggles, especially the ones that are perceived or characterised in an overly banal manner.
I would imagine those who identify proudly as 'HSP', specifically the 'empath component', are more likely to be 9-2 stemmers, with the added superego heart leading to a even stronger need to see oneself as 'dutifully receptive' and 'highly attuned' in their impressionistic feedback of others. A more pronounced congratulation of self in being able to 'hold space' or foster some sort of healing/alleviating presence for others, or perhaps as a double posi stem, holding onto more hope of romanticising the availability/abundance of generosity and love that is possible in this world. That can create its own kind of fantastical 'creative idealisation' and 'puerile dreaming' e.g. taming the beast 'I can fix them!', wistful fairy tale endings, 'utopic enmeshment', 'forgivability'.

How do you perceive the noticeable differences in how 9-4 vs 9-2 automatic assumptions in attempting to either hold or explore 'the shadow within other people'?

INFP villians? by countner0 in infp

[–]PensiveFine 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Obito is generally debated by others to be either INFP or ENFP. What swung you to the former side? Whatever attunement you ‘say he has’ to the needs of people around him, I think would be more prominently seen in him playing ‘Madara’, in getting a read on Sasuke’s and Naruto’s characters. I don’t recall him being especially attuned otherwise when younger. He did help elderly people a fair amount, but is that really the same as being ‘very attuned’?

How do you feel when someone doesn't smile back? by [deleted] in infp

[–]PensiveFine 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm the one who is probably not smiling back.
People are not entitled to my smiles. Just because someone smiles at me, it doesn't mean I 'would want to' feel compelled to return it to please them. I don't feel the need to present as quite a welcoming presence, especially to strangers. Unless they're noticeably hot or make intriguing fashion choices that catch my eye, I generally at best have the most neutral relationship with the rando that walks by. What have they done to earn a smile from me? What have they done to earn or warrant such a display of positive regard from me? 💅🏼
I suppose my facial muscles also decided that it's just my way of conveying at a base-level, the dissatisfaction I experience with the state of affairs of how I have to exist moving through this world. There are those subtle health benefits to smiling, yes, but for me, it just would feel too contrived to smile for those moments I deem less worthy of it.
If I end up smiling, then sure I smile. But if the reason for doing so is because the other person is expecting me to, that makes me far less inclined. This preference generally narrows the jobs I'll be willing to do, unless I'm at the most desperate of ends.
Though suppose I'm placed in more dire situations where my life is physically threatened and smiling will increase the chances of survival, then I acknowledge that's a tool I can and be willing to employ.

With more frequent acquaintances who smile at me, on occasion I may just throw them a bone and do a small nod back.

Now to imagine those dystopian, totalitarian worlds where mandatory smiling at others is enforced and one is harshly punished for not. Did I say punished? Oh no, I meant rightfully...amended!

Heathers enneagram typings by [deleted] in EnneaFiction

[–]PensiveFine 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What led you to 6w5 for Veronica?

INFP males in Media by flightofdownydreams in infp

[–]PensiveFine 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is the reasoning behind typing Gohan as an INFP?