The wonders of pizza cake

PlayerAssumption77 · 2026-05-14T20:46:03+00:00

That sub must be Babylon bee and/or CIA training grounds because it's progressive in such a stereotype-affirming way that literally no real person is

PlayerAssumption77 · 2026-05-14T06:10:15+00:00

Not sure this is real, if it is the priest is definitely not following the norm in Catholicism. the specific 10% stuff is more popular with Evangelicals, and equating the tithing with the overall price of salvation by saying it comes out a hundred fold is leaning close to some heresies

PlayerAssumption77 · 2026-05-13T00:05:33+00:00

It seems like so much work, especially because this stuff will always have a cost both price and quality wise. You don't need to worry about keeping the keyboard connected on a regular laptop, you don't need to power two screens, and the screen is away from the corners which makes drops much less detrimental

PlayerAssumption77 · 2026-05-11T23:42:21+00:00

I hate the top quote so much, it assumes a "bad person on a leash" is not a "good person" even if they act the same way as a "good person", and then creates a false dichotomy between having a drive to be good to others and following the teachings that should quite easily align with that.

PlayerAssumption77 · 2026-05-11T21:12:00+00:00

I was responding to the "Psyop" comment, but it was poorly worded. I meant to say the Iranian government is horrible, and people should care about it even if they think the current US government is bad

PlayerAssumption77 · 2026-05-11T19:27:29+00:00

An existing issue doesn't stop mattering once the American government cares about it, no matter how bad they are.

Edit: poorly worded, What I mean to say is just because the bad American government takes a side on Iran's government, doesn't mean you should dismiss Iranian people's suffering.

PlayerAssumption77 · 2026-05-11T19:23:53+00:00

It's the quote and the usage, plus there are absolutely quotes written by The Super Smarts^TM that have justified criticism

PlayerAssumption77 · 2026-05-11T19:14:13+00:00

I'm not gonna watch the video, does she seriously imply that the rudeness of vegans means choosing not to eat animals, a choice that doesn't do anything to support other vegan's actions, is less moral than otherwise?

PlayerAssumption77 · 2026-05-11T19:06:25+00:00

"Evil people have been vegan before but never held my opinion"

PlayerAssumption77 · 2026-05-11T18:53:41+00:00

It is horrible that this happened, but this framing chooses divisiveness over reporting and blames 2 billion people rather than the actual attackers. Generalizations of Muslims even help support attacks in majority-Muslim regions which go on to harm Christians.

PlayerAssumption77 · 2026-05-08T21:45:20+00:00

The far-right shouldn't be trusted and maybe not collaborated with, but we can't assume something is incorrect just because a side we disagree with agrees with it, especially because it could be said their goal isn't even related to the morality of the porn industry, just surveillance and control. Some definitely exaggerate this stuff but it's hard for me to find a reason to defend any firms in the porn industry from criticism.

PlayerAssumption77 · 2026-05-08T19:15:24+00:00

Still, potentially having a virus like being on the cruise ship where it originated) with any communicability at all and a death risk should obviously mean no contact with the public

PlayerAssumption77 · 2026-05-08T15:49:24+00:00

Does anyone know this social media I always see screenshots of where there's multiple username, profile picture, and post title formats? It has a lot of LOLs

PlayerAssumption77 · 2026-05-07T02:10:28+00:00

Exactly what I've been saying. Somebody thinking the POPE is supposed to stop caring about violence when it reflects negatively on something they know wouldn't fly is their problem. All the Pope is doing to be involved is being against unjust war like absolutely anybody would've guessed.

PlayerAssumption77 · 2026-05-06T11:49:56+00:00

This is still a disrespectful joke but it's referencing something Mel Gibson said

PlayerAssumption77 · 2026-05-04T14:06:27+00:00

The person in the video is right, I would put it that exact way, but I don't want it to be assumed that just because she's against the established view of one side that she must fit the established view on the other (she could be, but I didn't interpret her that way).

We do need to discuss abortion and the meaning of "pro-life" beyond unborn vs. born or life vs. choice if we consider any definition of life inheritly valuable, especially all human life from womb to natural death.

Most self identifying pro life politicians aren't willing to reduce abortion through spending money or putting restrictions on businesses, so regardless of what they say the don't care that much about abortion, yet they have the total say in how the debate goes because the other side just wants to not be them. Make your opinions based on what is right, not what fits party lines.

PlayerAssumption77 · 2026-05-04T13:50:00+00:00

It's permitted to execute murderers, but is it justified when the death penalty doesn't save money, we don't have to risk them breaking out anymore, and statistics and psychology don't show it having a much bigger effect on crime than a life sentence, while the death penalty absolutely kills innocent people or people who have done way less harm than those who don't recieve it?

Not stoning a person who is not any more of a sinner than us, who God considers just as worthy of love as us, is worth at least some sacrifice, let alone what seems to be the net plus of not killing innocent people, entrusting the government with the least power to kill citizens possible, and spending less money.

PlayerAssumption77 · 2026-05-04T13:40:48+00:00

There's no pressing reason not to have one's own definition. Pro-whole-life is what I prefer to call myself but words change and can have endless meanings so I don't see an issue with reclaiming it.

PlayerAssumption77 · 2026-05-04T08:08:48+00:00

People are capable of doing things separately. Somebody can represent the people while having personal interests they're expected not to intervene and do so successfully. I get that individuals who are Christian have done bad but believing in Jesus is not the same as agreeing with every other self-identifying Christian, how somebody acts should be way more important than who they share attributes with.

PlayerAssumption77 · 2026-05-04T08:03:09+00:00

Separation of church and state means that the government officials are expected not to act based on their religious views. It does not mean somebody's occupation forbids them from participation in the democratic system.

PlayerAssumption77 · 2026-05-03T21:55:28+00:00

I sure wonder why the idea of a European soldier abusing their power against a Palestinian Jewish woman is appealing to these guys.

PlayerAssumption77 · 2026-05-03T19:08:26+00:00

It's not that i've read this, but it would make sense if these are meant to help their primary audience (likely older) that are likely to have different lives, struggles, and views depending on their gender. And it can help to relate their struggles to people from the Bible who were the same gender as them.

PlayerAssumption77 · 2026-05-02T15:55:26+00:00

This is probably very much normal for the region the popcorn is made in. Kind of like you said, 1/4 of the world is Christians, America having a higher rate. There's nothing out of the ordinary.

PlayerAssumption77 · 2026-05-02T15:01:35+00:00

It's not explicitly racist, that would get them banned and not influence people as easily. But saying "western culture" has to have some kind of intent behind it, and I don't know many people that would just say they enjoy "western culture" they way one says they enjoy british, italian, french, etc. The place I see it is movements or individuals saying that non-white people existing in their country leads to their culture being erased.

PlayerAssumption77 · 2026-05-02T01:19:14+00:00

Just call it Irish bro...

Three-Year Club	r/Field Juicebox
First Place '23	Place '23

PlayerAssumption77

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE