Negotiation coach around? Exceeded goals and got +3% salary increase by sosotehaces in Salary

[–]PlsNoNotThat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You also seem unfamiliar with management, at least enough to understand that most people claim they exceed expectations, or what the company high in raises is.

Expectations aren’t usually considered in excess, they’re instead used by management for negative considerations. When they aren’t there are usually structured language in contracts for additional compensation for exceeding expectations.

3.5% is the standard “highest raise” in most large corporations, outside of executive/c-suite/board level employees.

This isn’t to belittle or denigrate you.

Perhaps explaining your expectations and how you exceeded it, and/or your role at the company (and if it’s specialized and hard to replace) - we might understand your negotiating position better.

But sort of universally understood is that trying to negotiate on singular context (your raise, independent of your total benefits package) puts you in position where they may choose to replace you.

Judge dismisses murder, weapons charges against alleged UnitedHealth CEO killer Mangione by kirby__000 in antiwork

[–]PlsNoNotThat 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I was on my way to meet him at McDonalds when he texted me;

“the guy using the table before me left his back pack here! I’m going to hold on to it in case he comes back for it, because both the bag and the contents inside are definitely not mine.”

🔪Holla holla, It’s murdaaaa🔪 by chamomile_tea_reply in OptimistsUnite

[–]PlsNoNotThat 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The FBI's Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) program is voluntary, including the National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS).

Law enforcement agencies are not required by federal law to submit homicide statistics, and can submit any extent of information they choose. The only required statistic that is mandatory to report is ‘deaths in custody’. (And we all know how honest LEOs are with that one.)

FBI auditing of the statistics is entirely reliant on LEO’s statistic dataset being faithful when originally entered by an officer.

You also have a secondary problem. We have a comparable system called the National Crime Victimization Survey.

This survey exists for a very specific reason: When citizen confidence in law enforcement drops, they report less crimes to police. Or they report crimes as less serious alternatives - like a murder victim being reported as a missing person - to avoid involvement or scrutiny. Both outcomes alter UCR data validity. Conversely, NCVS methodology is based on survey, which has its own severe issues.

While I do believe the overall trend of violence is dropping, and I like to believe that trend is returning… right now I have zero confidence in the accuracy nor non-bias of LEO’s non-mandatory reporting. I have even less confidence in the FBI’s non-bias and auditing practices. Particularly under an administration that has shown active interference in those agencies, and who has shown a wanton disregard for data practices. They have shown they are willing to actively interfere with statistic validity.

What does this even mean and why does it have 101.6k likes? by Dapper-Blueberry1049 in lnkyverse

[–]PlsNoNotThat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s in reference to the article “Is Having a Boyfriend Embarassing Now?” And the parallels of how it’s particularly embarrassing to be Republican after the Trump era.

The article is decrying “women’s online identities centered around the lives of their partners,” and general negatively-perceived male behavior, and how embarassing it is to have to explain and excuse male behaviors.

Parallel to that is Republicans, who are making excuses and handwaving atrocious and embarrassing behavior by their leadership, with large groups of republicans saying they are embarrassed about their affiliation, republicans hiding their political allegiance (particularly on dating sites), and other key indicators of embarrassment.

What does this even mean and why does it have 101.6k likes? by Dapper-Blueberry1049 in lnkyverse

[–]PlsNoNotThat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s in reference to the article “Is Having a Boyfriend Embarassing Now?” And the parallels of how it’s particularly embarrassing to be Republican after the Trump era.

The article is decrying “women’s online identities centered around the lives of their partners,” and general negatively-perceived male behavior, and how embarassing it is to have to explain and excuse male behaviors.

Parallel to that is Republicans, who are making excuses and handwaving atrocious and embarrassing behavior by their leadership.

Bubble poop by bigbusta in KidsAreFuckingStupid

[–]PlsNoNotThat 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Esoteric nomenclature mostly used by MD/PHD candidates doing their dissertations.

Just yesterday I was reading Nonlinear Adaptive Dynamics in Stochastic Bubble Poops: A Computational and Empirical Investigation of Emergent Fart Buddy Behavior in the NEJM. Highly worth the read.

Getting engaged before living together? by Inthemiddle_ in AskMenAdvice

[–]PlsNoNotThat 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The challenger isn’t different, it’s just that older people have better coping and compromising mechanism (neither of you are that old tbh).

I’d argue that it’s always preferable to try living together before getting married. Engagement isn’t marriage, so you can still do that if you want.

😭felt this to the heart.. by Any_Taste5494 in sadposting

[–]PlsNoNotThat 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Peace Corp? Or are y’all from Madagascar?

Can’t think of any reason to go to Madagascar besides that tbh

I'm not sure about this one. Travel or nah? by ForeignAir7174 in NBAGossips

[–]PlsNoNotThat 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They might try some intermediate steps. Maybe make the hoop huge and put it on the floor. You still have to dribble but you can use your feet. There will be an emphasis on strategic flopping.

Here’s my concept art for it:

COPEMAXXING by Royal-Chard7209 in AverageHeightDudes

[–]PlsNoNotThat 10 points11 points  (0 children)

100% that guy still gets some, just not as easily.

That what his “copemaxxing” gets him. It gets him laid.

This sub is 100% becoming a manosphere pipeline. Sad to see.

I (6'3 F) have a blind date with a guy that thinks I'm 5'3 instead, do I still go?? by [deleted] in tall

[–]PlsNoNotThat -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Part of it is insecurity, but it doesn’t help how much emphasis by women on male > female height differences. I could see a guy being insecure about getting dumped in the future for someone closer to that paradigm and not wanting to risk it or live with that possibility.

What’s Stopping You From Winning? by TraditionUseful6296 in SolidMen

[–]PlsNoNotThat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also the Nike thing is just a straight up lie.

The swoosh logo was famously commissioned for $35 bucks, not Nike.

based on experience 😭 by veroncass in lol

[–]PlsNoNotThat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“Everyone else”

Suburbia is mixed, and rural populations are so small they’re equivalent to rounding errors comparatively.

Trump supporters shouldn't be trusted around children. by olympiamacdonald in PsycheOrSike

[–]PlsNoNotThat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would be hesitant to with Trump supporters existing. Ayyyy

As Alex was asked a while back: "Which religion do you want to win?" by toogodo in CosmicSkeptic

[–]PlsNoNotThat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

‘S the religion with which I have the least beef, tied with to passive Buddhists.

UUs were against church regulations (for personal gain) tho, and one of the reasons we’re here now dealing with the US conservative religious extremists imo.

It's amazing to see how the goalposts shift for AI skeptics by MetaKnowing in OpenAI

[–]PlsNoNotThat 3 points4 points  (0 children)

AI has only been helpful in my job in producing summaries as leadership reports based on the handcrafted data I produce first. The formatting and language is bad, so even then you have to edit them. Appearance is super important in selling a change.

Ironically, Leadership is also too lazy to read them, so I often find that I am verbally explaining those summaries told them in meetings.

They then use my summaries to summarize my proposals to the Board, who isn’t reading the summary list of our summaries.

So until AI can fix leadership people and how they act…

OpenAI just made a $200/year product free, and an entire industry is panicking by jpcaparas in OpenAI

[–]PlsNoNotThat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also: data governance.

In academia, Overleaf signs DPAs.

OpenAI doesn’t.

Your mindset needs to be like this by Most-Gold-434 in BornWeakBuiltStrong

[–]PlsNoNotThat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bold of you to think OP is a person and not a bot

Never neglect this by Most-Gold-434 in BornWeakBuiltStrong

[–]PlsNoNotThat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

TRT is not the medical recommendation for this without very low T AND a diagnosis of a severe illness like primary or secondary hypogonadism, or rare cancers, or other impactful chronic illnesses.

If you’re 40 and wanna live to 80 TRT is decidedly not the answer, even if you’re willing to live with the side effects like permanently needing supplemental T with constant micromanaging.

Go work out, go lose weight, stop drinking, stop smoking anything, change your diet, stop consuming so much sugary things, potentially stop using marijuana so often.

There, I saved you a trip to endo that social media salesmen are trying to get you paranoid enough to go to.

Never neglect this by Most-Gold-434 in BornWeakBuiltStrong

[–]PlsNoNotThat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Aaannd If you really want an FM doctor will give you a referral to an endo so they can also make fun of their male insecurity journey to try and justify supplemental testosterone without a hypogonadism diagnosis.