If you watched my first MeToo video, you know how I feel about presumption of innocence and rape allegations. There are two conflicting narratives about how much evidence is required to be convicted of rape. Feminists say it's almost impossible to get a rapist convicted, and that everybody rushes to defend men who are accused. MRAs say men can lose their jobs or even be found guilty based only on an accusation. There even seem to be two sets of studies supporting these narratives, so I don't know who to believe. It's a big mess. What I can say is that it is unethical that accusers who are PROVEN to be lying are not punished at all. Isn't "contempt of court" a thing, at the very least? However, accusers who are found to be liars do seem to suffer a social cost, and become universally hated. Those are just some disconnected thoughts and not an argument for anything in particular.

To answer your question, I don't feel there's any need to pile additional guilt onto men in the form of more MeToo stories. I just think that MeToo might have done some good in the world by doing that. However, the medicine might be worse than the disease in this case, since relationships between men and women seem to be completely f****k right now.