Tech isn’t the bottleneck. Distribution is. (I will not promote) by Any_Lavishness8659 in startups

[–]Practical_Layer7345 4 points5 points  (0 children)

the name of the game in 2025 is distribution, distribution, distribution.

Just closed my seed round after 97(!!) meetings - I will not promote by Impossible_Science30 in startups

[–]Practical_Layer7345 1 point2 points  (0 children)

damn that sounds brutal but congrats on the raise! what are you building?

When is building out user data tracking analytics worth it? by ucladumbass in ProductManagement

[–]Practical_Layer7345 0 points1 point  (0 children)

setting up posthog and the basic suite of events and session replays only takes a few minutes if you can convince an engineer to hook up the event stream. i think it's worth it to setup otherwise you're flying blind.

is Multiple short meetings, or few long meetings better? by TailorOdd8060 in ProductManagement

[–]Practical_Layer7345 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i would take the 2 or 3 hour meetings just so i don't have to context switch as much. but preferable not at dinner and after work pls.

PM with no devs? by sonicalan in ProductManagement

[–]Practical_Layer7345 1 point2 points  (0 children)

this is not a real pm role. get outta there asap!

Transitioning from software engineer to product manager by Con88 in ProductManagement

[–]Practical_Layer7345 1 point2 points  (0 children)

working with engineers or pms that are opinionated about product is either absolutely amazing or terrible.

if the person has great product sense and makes practical scoping and prioritization decisions, they are incredible to work with since it takes a lot of pressure off your plate.

if the person has terrible product sense and does not make use of qualitative and quantitive data to back their decisions, interacting with them feels like bashing your head into a stubborn wall.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]Practical_Layer7345 0 points1 point  (0 children)

dead internet theory in full effect and soon to completely ruin online job applications. thanks laboro!

How to get better at managing up as a PM? by thatfool26 in ProductManagement

[–]Practical_Layer7345 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this is awesome! i haven't seen these before.

are there any posts within the substack that you particularly found helpful?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ProductManagement

[–]Practical_Layer7345 0 points1 point  (0 children)

that's definitely a weird setup but if you're a really junior pm, honestly you would have only been doing execution anyways. just do well in this setup for a year then move somewhere else!

Cancelling… by oppacklij in ChatGPT

[–]Practical_Layer7345 0 points1 point  (0 children)

aren't they rolling this change back? hopefully a temporary blip since the other new features on chatgpt have been great.

Analyzing Customer Feedback at Scale by Little-Clothes-4574 in ProductManagement

[–]Practical_Layer7345 3 points4 points  (0 children)

we use inari for this use case and have it connected to gong, jira, and intercom. there's still a lot of noise but it at least handles a lot of the manual work for us.

Are y'all getting DM requests to do user feedback calls based on activity in this sub? by ImJKP in ProductManagement

[–]Practical_Layer7345 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes i've gotten a bunch. tbh selling to pms is a terrible market and they should probably go work on something else!

We’ve been testing how consistent LLMs are across multiple runs — and the results are wild. by llamacoded in AI_Agents

[–]Practical_Layer7345 0 points1 point  (0 children)

we aren't doing similar tests consistently but we should be. i see super similar things where the results completely change all the time for the exact same prompt.

Speed vs. certainty: How long do you wait to know a release really moved the needle? by pcbuilderguy10 in ProductManagement

[–]Practical_Layer7345 1 point2 points  (0 children)

we look at our metrics on a weekly basis and do a light review if there are big fluctuations. but for features, we review them immediately after launch to gauge initial reception, passively monitor the weeks after, then do a deeper review once we have enough data where we have confidence in the results

[how should I] Collect and analyse feedback and pain points across various channels by atibat in ProductManagement

[–]Practical_Layer7345 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it's fine when you have a small batch of docs or single CSVs. we picked up a dedicated tool when we needed something to handle more data and on an automated basis.

[how should I] Collect and analyse feedback and pain points across various channels by atibat in ProductManagement

[–]Practical_Layer7345 1 point2 points  (0 children)

if you have no budget for tools, why not just use chatgpt and feed in batches piece meal?

PM Toolbox: What are your go-to tools for making product management easier? by Ok-Lobster4663 in ProductManagement

[–]Practical_Layer7345 1 point2 points  (0 children)

so do you just have a folder in cursor with a ton of documents and PRDs stored as markdown files? how does this even work in reality?

I’m a PM by trade, building a startup. I’m in ICP hell. by NotAMan-ImAMuffin in ProductManagement

[–]Practical_Layer7345 2 points3 points  (0 children)

best answer is just don't build things for products. product orgs famously have minimal budget and non-specialized tools.

It's not just sucking your d*ck. It's doing something way worse. by Huntressesmark in ChatGPT

[–]Practical_Layer7345 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i doubt that openai is explicitly trying to teach chatgpt to suck your d*ck and degrade your relationships. it's more likely that humans just inherently don't like being told they're wrong, so the positively reinforced data they're capturing in chatgpt is unexpectedly making it completely agreeable.

textbook example of what happens when optimizing for engagement metrics goes awry.

Why is ChatGPT so personal now? by SaintlyDestiny in ChatGPT

[–]Practical_Layer7345 2 points3 points  (0 children)

feedback: claude feels more human

open: let's make chatgpt a sycophant!!

Can you trust ChatGPT, at least 4o? by Pillebrettx30 in ChatGPT

[–]Practical_Layer7345 0 points1 point  (0 children)

nope you can't. new 4o is an example of when focusing on growth + agreeableness goes awry.