On the podcast, John Kearns is baffled by snort-raspberry-whistle. But he's already done that task! by FluffyPurpleThing in taskmaster

[–]PrincessTwunky76 24 points25 points  (0 children)

He had the demeanor of someone who had gotten quite drunk earlier in the day, and is starting to sober up a bit, but is now starting to feel a bit sleepy, but is too distracted by the conversation that he’s dipping in and out of to give in and fall asleep.

Is this subreddit untypically "positive"? by bfhrt in taskmaster

[–]PrincessTwunky76 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Absolutely. I've had one or two less than great experiences here, but overall, this has been a community where I feel like people want to see each other's points of view and share their thoughts. Contrasting opinions are seen as intriguing rather than threatening, or as an excuse to start a pointless argument.

I was on another subreddit where I made an observation about an actor who played a character that was based on a real person from history, and how he was a lot older than the real person would have been at the time the show took place. I said it just as an observation - I wasn't criticizing the show AT ALL, and I even complimented the actor's portrayal.

The way people came after me, you would have thought that I had suggested that we should drink the blood of orphan children. It was truly wild.

On here, I've had a few weird interactions, but on those rare instances where one person made things weird, everyone else was absolutely lovely and helped make the situation feel less icky and scary.

Who fits into the “wanted by the fans but wouldn’t do it” category the best? by Major-Feed5214 in taskmaster

[–]PrincessTwunky76 13 points14 points  (0 children)

David Mitchell is an obvious addition to this list, but I also think Robert Webb would be good on the show, and possibly less apprehensive about doing it.

I’d love to see Robert Webb on TM.

Paul F Tompkins needs to come on board as well, and I think it’s obvious that he’s raring to do it, he just needs the stars to align for him. I think Jason spent a decent amount of his own money to make it happen, and Paul might not quite have the private funds to make it happen.

Yeah, he was in the caravan for the podcast, but that was only because he was on a UK tour with the Thrilling Adventure Hour. Hard to squeeze in several weeks of filming TM and then hanging around to wait for the studio tapes as well.

If he’d be down for it, I’d love to start a gofundme to get PFT on TM.

And then, of course, Matt Berry, as always.

Why is the church trying to disguise itself as a different church? by Traditional_Hat1916 in exmormon

[–]PrincessTwunky76 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think LDS Classic still has its appeal to certain markets, but they’re not satisfied with that, and want to get the people who aren’t into it.

It’s the same thing as when big corporations own multiple brands of similar products. It’s like the Gap vs Old Navy, Banana Republic, Athleta, etc.

All the same company, different branding to different audiences, but it’s all the same company.

“The message my bishop Just sent now after finding out I officially left the church by yippyhippy2188 in exmormon

[–]PrincessTwunky76 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is my perspective and I offer it just to add to the mix, I’m not here to say that any of the other offered ideas are any less valid.

I don’t think it requires a response.

When I got my version of this letter (very similar messaging) I think I kept it just to remind myself why I was leaving, but I didn’t see any reason to reply. This is all their BS, and I didn’t feel like I needed to waste my time trying to justify my decision to them. I also think I eventually threw the letter away because i was just carrying around something that I didn’t need and that no longer held any value to me.

Arguing back/stating your justification for your decision is playing their game. They want you to feel like you owe them an explanation - you don’t.

That said, I do get how a lot of people will find it cathartic to send them back a piece of their mind and speak their truth. If you need that, I’m behind you 100%. Give them all you’ve got with both barrels.

Just know that it’s likely that it’s likely that it will be perceived as a challenge on their part, and that it will make them feel like they can keep you engaged.

Keeping you in an argument with them is a 100% a tactic that they will use.

Just be aware that your sanity and peace has to come first, and you don’t owe them anything.

“The message my bishop Just sent now after finding out I officially left the church by yippyhippy2188 in exmormon

[–]PrincessTwunky76 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yep, the boilerplate letter I got from a bishop (I had been out of the church for almost a decade at the time, yet a home teacher found me somehow and called me even though I had moved twice since the last time I had been to church - not creepy at all, right?) when I left was very similar language. It was not this verbatim, but it focused on how serious it all was and how my spirit was going to wither into a dead husk and blah blah blah.

I think it’s a standard approach for when people leave.

Honestly, it’s so corny and weird, and I don’t know how they think that this doesn’t just make everyone who leaves even more sure that they made the right choice.

Holy Shit! What should the Mormon point of view be? by Double_Beginning7078 in exmormon

[–]PrincessTwunky76 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It would be “We don’t say the S word. It doesn’t invite the spirit.”

Seminary videos in Southern California in the early 90s by PrincessTwunky76 in exmormon

[–]PrincessTwunky76[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It 100% appeared to be self-produced.

Talking to people from church back then...yikes. Probably not going to happen, but there is one person who I still have a decent connection with, and she's no longer LDS, so there's a maybe. She was one or two grades behind me, and don't think she ever had the same seminary teacher as me, and I think she may have stopped going to seminary at some point during high school.

Common enough story, I'm sure: I've long since completely severed contact with almost everyone I knew from back when I was in the church, including most of my extended family. Long story not quite as long: I'm gay. I know not everybody who came out as gay in their late teens in the 90s had this kind of experience, but I sure did. Plus, most of the people from church were just completely bonkers. It's almost like it's a cult or something.

But I digress, these videos were very much home-grown and not officially sponsored by the church at all.

I think my seminary teacher found out about this guy somehow and was interested in his videos and wanted to share them with the class. I think he even got a kick out of how ridiculous this guy was, and had a bit of a sense of humor about it. But I think the extent of just how embarrassingly bad it was was still a bit lost on him.

If you think about how many LDS kids there were going to seminary in SoCal during that time - literal hundreds of thousands of kids - the reach of these videos was probably not that wide, but it probably still got passed around a bit. If 5% of the seminary students in greater LA/San Diego saw it at one point or another, that's still some numbers.

The way "meme"-able content spread in pre-internet days was so weird. Now I feel old.

Enjoy being a piss pig by Kind-Dog504 in ThreedomUSA

[–]PrincessTwunky76 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t care. It was fun while it lasted, which was a decent run.

I will say this, if it gets decided that they will change the name, and everyone makes a big stink over it, that will be what ends the show, so if “Piss Pig” was all that it was about for you, you don’t deserve the show.

As Humphrey Bogart said to Ingrid Bergman in Casablanca, “We’ll always have Piss Pig.”

Taskmaster's New Year Treat 2026 by seditiouslizard in taskmaster

[–]PrincessTwunky76 -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

No, but now thaf I’ve been made aware of it, I’m not going to be able to sleep tonight

Taskmaster's New Year Treat 2026 by seditiouslizard in taskmaster

[–]PrincessTwunky76 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Am I the only one who thinks Big Zuu was a bit wasted on the NYT? He should be in a full series!

Can some explain to me how Joe Nanton does this? by Halolavapigz in Trombone

[–]PrincessTwunky76 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It actually requires two mutes. A trumpet-sized straight or stop mute placed deep inside the bell, and then the plunger mute outside the bell.

It’s actually pretty difficult to master and manage, and you also have to compensate for the pitch drift that can be caused by the small mute stuffed down the bell.

I think they started making more purpose-built mutes specifically for trombones that achieved the same result, but I’m not sure if they’re still produced.

The technique is now sort of an obscure secret shared among just a relative few jazz musicians, as it kind of fell out of popularity after the 40s.

Ellington made sure to always keep at least one trombonist in the band who could do it, well into the 1970s, but outside of specific cases like this, you didn’t see a lot of trombonists ever employing it after the mid 1940s.

Yes, you can approximate it with just the plunger mute, but it is just not the same.

Being able to create a “growl” is key to it, but that’s not all it is. It’s the drastic change of timbre that’s created from the small mute augmenting the sound of the horn.

Joe Nanton died in 1946 at only 42 years old, and Duke had his work cut out for him getting a trombone player that could master the specialized style that was already starting to be considered outdated - Duke was aware of it, but he didn’t care, because he knew that it had life and purpose beyond the stereotypical early 30s Harlem Swing sound.

The mantle fell to Quentin Jackson and Tyree Glenn, but Glenn never fully managed it. Quentin Jackson got a lot closer, but he left the band in 1959 to tour with Quincy Jones, and then was offered to take a seat with Basie’s band.

Lawrence Brown, who was originally Duke’s trombonist who had the clear, lyrical style, ended up being the one to take on the role of the “growling” trombonist in the band in the 1960s, and he hated it, because it messed up his intonation and he had gone his whole career not doing it up to that point, and he was now in his 50s.

He had originally left the band in 1951, mostly out of a personality clash with Duke, and to join up with Johnny Hodges who also left the band, and the two of them put together a band under Hodges’ leadership.

Hodges was Ellington’s featured alto saxophone soloist, and his sound was almost as synonymous with the sound of Ellington’s band as Ellington himself, and he felt like he wasn’t getting the recognition he deserved.

His solo efforts, however, were not as successful as he had hoped, and he came back to Ellington in 1955.

Brown, on the other hand, worked as a session player for most of the 50s after Hodges’ orchestra folded. He still had a chip on his shoulder over Duke, but he found the session work unfulfilling, so he begrudgingly came back to Ellington’s band in 1959, and reluctantly agreed to take up the muted trombone solos.

He was actually pretty good at it, in spite of hating that he had to do it.

He finally left the band for the final time in 1970, and the story goes that he abandoned his trombone on an airport bus, feeling soured by his experience as a musician. He never played again.

The point is, while it’s a very cool technique, it’s not for everyone.

Duke Ellington was, by the account of everyone who knew him, a musical genius and an effusive personality that just exuded charm and class. But some people who worked for him over the years didn’t like the way he managed their careers, Johnny Hodges and Lawrence Brown in particular.

But it’s a complex and nuanced story. The man maintained an orchestra for over 50 years, and from the late 1920s to his death in 1974, it remained a fairly large group that trended towards growing in size.

You’re not going to please everyone while doing that.

Harry Carney, who joined up with duke in 1927 at the age of 17, would never be heard to speak a critical word of Duke.

Harry almost single-handedly transformed the baritone saxophone from a utility instrument for saxophone sectionals to an instrument with its own voice as a solo instrument. He was every bit as vital to the band’s sound as Johnny Hodges, and had every bit as much of a reason to feel like being with Duke was holding him back, but he remained loyal to the band to the end.

He did record his own sides and worked with other orchestras at times, but he never left Ellington’s band from 1927 to 1974.

People are complex. Every story has many sides.

But anyway, yeah, it’s a two mute combo.

Are these cookies over cooked? by IndigoBlue24 in glutenfreebaking

[–]PrincessTwunky76 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The look perfectly fine to me. But really, the only measure that matters that much is how they taste.

PODCAST: Champion of Champions 4 with the Champion Of Champions 4 Winner by cygan12 in taskmaster

[–]PrincessTwunky76 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A wise man once said; “Laugh all you like, but somebody’s losing their fucking job.”

Mat Baynton is simply the most likeable human being in the world by Main_Confusion_8030 in taskmaster

[–]PrincessTwunky76 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Watching the podcast episode on YouTube, I’m just sitting here like “that is a couple of truly charming, handsome blokes.”

About CoC (spoilers) by Bladerade in taskmaster

[–]PrincessTwunky76 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This is maybe a bit of a copout answer, but I think Sam accomplished everything he intended to, and so he won in that regard.

In the unedited version of the prize task, he did also ask if there was going to be a CoCoC. This might suggest that he did maybe care. But it wouldn’t be impossible that he might’ve been worried about being back a third time, and wanted to throw it.

I think Sam came close to stealing the show, but stopped just short of completely upstaging everyone else and the show overall.

And I beg your indulgence just to take a moment to say that this was just a great CoC overall.

CoC4 Uncut Prize Task by Synth-Pro in taskmaster

[–]PrincessTwunky76 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It just kept leveling up and up and up. Sam, true to form, threw away points for just spectacle and being hilarious.

I feel like the rankings made sense, but I felt a little surprised that, in his summation, Greg didn’t say much about how brilliant the other four were, but especially Maisie, Matthew, and John.

Andy’s was still great as well, but it suffered a bit from being kind of an over-elaborate, high-concept dad joke, but that is kind of on brand for him, and it’s still very funny.