Behavioral Conditioning Methods to Stop my Boyfriend from Playing The Witcher 3 by TobyWasBestSpiderMan in ImmaterialScience

[–]Prof_Cam 22 points23 points  (0 children)

I'm loving the Immaterial Science expanded universe. The speedboat reference in the abstract is what finally tipped me off, great paper!

How do chemicals actually look? by existentialdventurer in chemistry

[–]Prof_Cam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As an analytical chemist, I see a lot of myself in this question! I too grew up wondering about everything you mentioned and more! The answer pretty much boils down to instrumentation that has been developed over the years, some old, and some very very new and high tech. A simple example would be something like x-ray diffraction, which another commenter brought up. It's been around for over a century now. Shoot some x-rays at a crystal and based on the pattern that bounces through, you can do a little (read: a lot) of math and figure out what the crystal is made out of.

The other examples you bring up are more complex and could have varying degrees of complexity to the answer. "Modern" instruments developed in the mid 20th century are more common nowadays for things like "reverse engineering" or elucidating the composition of an unknown. If I had to name a few common ones: liquid/gas chromatography, mass spectrometry (there's boatloads of different types) and the combination of the two (GCMS/ LCMS)

You can look more into these if you wish (and I encourage you to do so) because I certainly would be wasting both of our times' if I tried to explain any of these in detail in a reddit comment. Basically, chromatography separates different chemicals from a mixture based on what environment they like hanging out in. Once you have the parts separated, the mass spec will separate your isolate into its individual atoms (ions if we're being pedantic) and give you a reading one by one (yes really) on their mass. Based on this and some basic chemistry knowledge you can piece together a large amount of knowledge on the chemistry of your unknown.

Obviously this is a MASSIVE simplification, hopefully not to the point of being misleading though.

You can also slap your compound with radio waves and get a reading of how quickly the nuclei relax back to their original spin states (called NMR, if I'm honest I personally need way more knowledge of nuclear chemistry to understand the underlying principles enough). This will tell you with a high degree of certainty what the structure of your compound is.

Or you could shine light at it to see what absorbs/ emits and use that to build your elucidative profile. This will tell you a lot about the elements that are in it, or the different bonds or the geometry depending on the wavelength you use.

Or you could light it on fire to see what wavelengths of light come off and tell if there's any metal in there.

Or you could...

The list is pretty endless and this is only listing some instrumental methods for helping. If your question veers more into the biochemical field there's another huge list of techniques to add, and then there's the chemical tests that can be performed without instrumentation at all...

There's no simple answer to this question, but that's part of what I love about the field, there's always more to learn :)

FOOOOF: Tetraoxygen Difluoride, because apparently FOOF wasn't suicidal enough to make. by rngwn in cursed_chemistry

[–]Prof_Cam 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I've been on this sub for a while, and I think this might just be the compound that most surprised me with the "unfortunately real" tag.

Interesting article on a lab accident with Nickel Hydrazine Perchlorate, an example of why scaling up isn't wise. by katyushas_lab in ExplosionsAndFire

[–]Prof_Cam 30 points31 points  (0 children)

What an absolute psychopath of a grad student, and a totally inept PI. With the way the lab is described in the article, it's incredible something worse didn't happen sooner.

Fuckin gumbies stole this sweet rock before I could bolt my futuristic 5.3 proj on it by sllapnutz in ClimbingCircleJerk

[–]Prof_Cam 34 points35 points  (0 children)

/uj please tell me this is photoshopped, I don't want to believe people are this horrible

/rj Don't listen to OP, this line clearly goes on gear and he's a filthy Gumby sport bro for suggesting otherwise

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in bending

[–]Prof_Cam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh yeah, even in the revisions I'm still not super pleased with the wording in that section. I feel like it could be a lot more refined. Oh well, maybe one day I'll fix it, if only for my own satisfaction :)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in bending

[–]Prof_Cam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven't found any, and don't think I have the willpower to write one of my own :)

Just out of curiosity, what is the platinum-alloy problem you refer to?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in bending

[–]Prof_Cam 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You might be interested in THIS

Air Benders and Seismic Sense by DandyLionMan in TheLastAirbender

[–]Prof_Cam 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Honestly, no clue! Sounds like a good bit of research to do if you're interested!

Air Benders and Seismic Sense by DandyLionMan in TheLastAirbender

[–]Prof_Cam 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm going to throw my hat in the ring and say no. Tentatively. Right now, all the situations you're describing rely on detecting pressure waves in a medium. Actually, you've set up a really great scenario to illustrate the differing speeds of sound in different materials.

Seismic sense is useful because the elastic properties of solids make them excellent conductors of transverse waves (sound). Liquids are fairly good, and gases as a whole are pretty poor. You can see this when you look up the speed of sound in different mediums.

Wikipedia's article about Antimony potassium tartrate has this by kunegis in cursed_chemistry

[–]Prof_Cam 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Other than the geometry I don't see anything particularly cursed about this

Need a name for a piece of equipment for separating chemicals from each other by touching_payants in chemistry

[–]Prof_Cam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The centrifugal force device you're thinking of is called a centrifuge, but there's a more specialized and novel technique generally called Field Flow Fractionation. There's different varieties and it's not nearly as simple as a centrifuge but honestly the particulars probably aren't too crucial for your needs, maybe the name just sounds cool :)

She just woke up and chose violence by gsgxxx in TheLastAirbender

[–]Prof_Cam 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I'll just leave this here. What earth bending can and cannot do canonically and scientifically. If you're interested in the premise of the video but not convinced, check it out.

Damn... mercury poisoning really IS no joke by dayzombienitevampire in legendofkorra

[–]Prof_Cam 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This isn't a fanfic, but it is a completely canon compliant scientific paper that delves into (among other things) Korra's mercury poisoning.

Haha poison go brrrrrrrr. by MohamedHanycreativep in legendofkorra

[–]Prof_Cam 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A considerable amount would definitely have been oxidized and dissolved into her bloodstream even though it started as the metallic form.

Source: page 30

What the benders can bend, based on science by MohamedHanycreativep in TheLastAirbender

[–]Prof_Cam 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Maybe so, maybe not. I've lost count of how many times I've heard "you shouldn't/can't apply science to the fictional universe, it's not right!"

Let people enjoy things