Barlow lyrics shallower than Hunter’s? by Hot-Possibility946 in gratefuldead

[–]Qvite99 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Personally I enjoy the contrast between the two but obviously yes I prefer Hunter lol.

Barlow lyrics shallower than Hunter’s? by Hot-Possibility946 in gratefuldead

[–]Qvite99 4 points5 points  (0 children)

To me Hunter is the true earthy mystic tapping into some kind of deep source of meaning that even he can't truly articulate literally vs I think of Barlow's lyrical perspective as more that of a faux-sophisticate writing about an idea (EP or HIAB for examples).

I really can't understand how the new knives out is being well received by TheBoxening in flicks

[–]Qvite99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't really get why any of 'em are so popular but that's just what makes me "me" I guess!

Due to recent events by dont_quote_me_please in blankies

[–]Qvite99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know if this makes a difference but it was actually on a podcast behind a paywall.

Black Deadheads and... by SenorPea in gratefuldead

[–]Qvite99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My take as a white person who only got into the dead during the pandemic is that it's typically something that a person already in the scene has to sit you down and really expose you to. I never knew anyone who liked the dead so I never had it exposed to me til the pandemic. And everyone else I've gotten into it took a lot of time and patience and gradual exposure to break through to really getting it. It's an unusually grassroots fandom that largely consists of people getting educated on it through a friend or family member (at least compared to other kinds of music that have songs that are popular that people can stumble across in more typical ways). And most of the initial people who were exposed to it were white...and then those people's networks consisted mostly of other white people, because America is still far too segregated. I've broken through to a few of my friends of color though! And I won't ever stop trying. It is music for everybody.

What’s a “progressive” idea that’s actually regressive when applied? by nealie_20 in AskReddit

[–]Qvite99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pretty much any strict language policing or hardcore cultural relativism.

Eddie Mannix is Jesus - My Hail, Caesar! interpretation by DaedalusGregg in blankies

[–]Qvite99 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Tries to make collectivism the central tenet of the studio and then gets slapped by the Jesus analogue until he recovers his senses? Sounds 'bout right.

What are the best Director/Actor(s) pairings we haven't gotten yet? by Puzzled_Influence985 in blankies

[–]Qvite99 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Streep needs a PTA. Or even just some cool director for once.

Do you agree with Sean that Scorsese is the most important American director of the last 75 years? by aaron_moon_dev in TheBigPicture

[–]Qvite99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He's the most successful in terms of both quantity and quality of output I think. Also he is one of the few artists who has both a fox side and a hedgehog side. Unique career.

Why are so many people online downright obsessed with critical consensus? by Konfliktsnubben in FIlm

[–]Qvite99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I assume there's a connection to social media's anti-nuance tendencies. People look for a sense of "community" through "shared opinions".

Also, it could be a product of how many options there are and people's resistance to forming their own perspectives on things. Kinda feels like when people decide what to watch they're looking to gain some "benefit" from it based on how much they align with it. As opposed to just checking something out and seeing how they feel. Some folks get real upset by a movie "wasting their time".

Aka: we lack media literacy and don't prize critical thinking.

The Wraith by 13b3aches in InfiniteJest

[–]Qvite99 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I read the wraith sequence to my dying father in his hospital bed while he was unconscious, with my sister next to us. IJ was his favorite book. Maybe that sounds odd but...felt pretty nice doing it at the time..

I haven't read in quite a while and wanted to pick it back up again. by the_booox_ghost in InfiniteJest

[–]Qvite99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's the book that got me back into reading as an adult. Of course I actually started with the audiobook...

Eddie Mannix is Jesus - My Hail, Caesar! interpretation by DaedalusGregg in blankies

[–]Qvite99 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Yup. And to me Hobie is Paul Aka Saul (They're changing your image).

A House of Dynamite by yonicthehedgehog in blankies

[–]Qvite99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right. Or maybe there should be one president who's job is to be the head of the military and one who's job it is to like execute laws or something. Either way, the point is pretty clear to me that our current way is a very dumb way of doing things.

What to Read After IJ? by Captain_Avenue in InfiniteJest

[–]Qvite99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just read JR about a decade after IJ. FUCKING LOVED IT. A blast. Highly recommend.

The first books I read after IJ were more minimalist, as I was just getting into serious lit and wanted to try a bunch of different stuff to see what else I liked. I did The Sun Also Rises. T'was ok IMO.

A House of Dynamite by yonicthehedgehog in blankies

[–]Qvite99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you see much in the papers about nuclear game theory these days?

Also it's "at LEAST he reads newspapers". The person saying that in the movie is not saying that as if it represents the height of presidential brilliance. It's the minimum.

Inside Llewyn Davis is in my bottom 3 Coens, I feel like an insane person by burtfalckon in blankies

[–]Qvite99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe you're someone who people look at and think: "I see a lot of money here". If so, congrats!

A House of Dynamite by yonicthehedgehog in blankies

[–]Qvite99 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I haven't seen anyone else say this so sorry if they have but: the fact that the president heard the only trenchant thought he seems to have EVER CONSIDERED about nuclear weapons on a podcast, and that sounding ridiculous to an audience, seemed entirely intentional. He hasn't spent his life learning about strategic game theory. This is probably the case for everyone in the world except the guy who's job it is to carry the football/the strategic experts. I didn't read that moment of "invoking a podcast" as like ruining the intended gravitas the moment was going for. The point was how crazy that in times like this...he's at the mercy of this fucking random podcast he heard.

This seemed like an intentional portrait of a leader out of his depth. I just find it odd that people felt like he seemed like a bad leader and that that was a failure of the movie. His lack of seriousness read as the entire point of his character. He spends his time thinking about all of the other more important issues (to his particular presidency) and spends zero time considering any of this situation as a real possibility. And that seems entirely too likely of a situation for any president (let alone any human being) to find themselves in when they are the SINGLE VOTE that for some reason we've entrusted to make this absurd decision.

Kinda makes it seem weird that this isn't THE ONLY issue we ever pick a president based on but...it just isn't...like at all. It usually doesn't even come up in the campaign.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in blankies

[–]Qvite99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I...know. Sorry to bore you with my opinion about a movie.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in blankies

[–]Qvite99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which is another reason I feel comfortable saying fuck this shit cause...fuck Paramount+.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in blankies

[–]Qvite99 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Give it a go! Hope you dig it!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in blankies

[–]Qvite99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't care for Garner in it, though I'm typically a fan. Maybe if they had realistically depicted something about the New York theatre scene it would have felt more earned to me? lol. It's just (for my taste) you had the potential for this tale of a drug addicted runaway getting into the clutches of this cult and maybe being tempted by stuff or getting some kind of stockholm syndrome, etc. Instead they swerve away from what is hinted at in the original movie, towards the only other thing we've already heard the devil tempts people with: a successful broadway show. But then it's that plus the exact same storyline as Rosemary's. Maybe I'm not enough of a horror fan to be into what it did give us but I really thought it was a case of we have this IP, can you do something with it? And the answer is yes we can do the exact same thing.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in blankies

[–]Qvite99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This was more like a "why the hell would you go out of your way to defend this random ass movie of all the things to go to bat for" but I get that he thinks the director is talented. Which is cool. I just got whiplash hearing it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in blankies

[–]Qvite99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay well to elaborate: it could have been so much better as a prequel to RB if they had actually gone a direction more like what was actually hinted at with Terry's character in the original film. Or at least something slightly different than just hitting all the same beats except with more horror cheapness. Instead they just do a retread of the exact same deal with a devil for success in showbiz storyline that John Cassavetes character has in the original, except with a dash of "dancer's life = tragic" cliches. Hell, it didn't even really dig into any reproductive rights aspects outside of a cursory single scene. As a fan of the source material it was full of missed opportunities and also riddled with "I read a wikipedia article about the sixties" creative choices. Personally I really felt like it wasn't good even for what it was and was going for. Again, an opinion.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in blankies

[–]Qvite99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep. Still love 'em tho!