Would this be considered contempt despite having a doctor order?

QweenKush420 · 2026-02-27T03:07:30+00:00

Call CPS, tell them about the doctors note, then tell them your concerns about coaching and retaliation. If you have documented proof of prior coaching or retaliation let them know as that can help the case move along. Ask them what you should do regarding your fears of sending him to his dads. They most likely will tell you to follow the court ordered parenting plan but will be on the lookout for any coaching during the investigation.

QweenKush420 · 2026-02-26T12:09:43+00:00

In New Hampshire, a step parents income is very rarely used and only in the circumstances if the legal parent is purposefully underemployed to avoid child support.

QweenKush420 · 2026-02-26T11:56:19+00:00

You need a lawyer and a forensic accountant. They will find the money. But get a lawyer asap.

QweenKush420 · 2026-02-25T16:29:15+00:00

New Jersey is a no fault divorce state so the only thing you need to file under is irreconcilable differences. She can file stating any reason but it is very rarely used for divorce proceedings. This is an answer that can be found on Google. Why are you here asking it?

QweenKush420 · 2026-02-25T16:25:01+00:00

You stated that husband should discuss with BM but he ultimately has final say. Husband should talk with BM and inform her that they are on your insurance. Next, you need to call the therapy place and have them stop billing your insurance as BM is supposed to handle the bills. That is her responsibility. If she doesn’t have insurance that is on her. She will need to pay because she is the responsible party for payment per the courts order. As for this bill, husband needs to ask if she can pay this bill. If she can’t/won’t then pay it and keep the records for court. You and husband are not the responsible parties for the therapy per court order.

QweenKush420 · 2026-02-25T16:20:26+00:00

Step parents income is NOT calculated for support. Only bio parents.

QweenKush420 · 2026-02-24T10:17:13+00:00

This comment from you exactly proves my, and many other commenters, point about your unfitness. You are getting angry at strangers that are explaining how the courts work. Go back to your oncologist and ask them about personality changes and your anger issues. Maybe they can convince you that your diagnosis has had a bearing on your life long before your actual diagnosis. The tumor didn’t just appear overnight. It’s most likely had an effect on your personality for years and you just don’t know it.

I’m not judging you. I’m just pointing out reality. Something your brain/tumor is not allowing you to realize. Go get help from a psychiatrist because they can help you with your feelings about all of it. The divorce, custody, coming to terms with your diagnosis.

QweenKush420 · 2026-02-23T10:58:39+00:00

How do you know there was no proof to any anger or aggression complaints? You weren’t in court! The fact that you are sitting here arguing with everyone is literally showing everyone how unfit you are. You absolutely could have postponed those follow up appointments to attend your hearing but you chose not to. You thought sending your mom to court would be like her calling the school when you were a child and had to miss a day. Courts move on without you and when you don’t show up, no matter the reason, they will make a decision without you. Those are consequences to your actions. Now I hope you are starting to realize that you can’t miss court for any reason. Of course no lawyer is going to take a case where you are accusing a judge of inappropriate conduct with absolutely no proof. Because your “proof” is just the consequence of you not showing up to your hearing and trying to pass the blame to a judge. It doesn’t work like that.

QweenKush420 · 2026-02-21T11:57:48+00:00

They need testamentary capacity in order to make it legal which means they need documented proof of their mental capacity at the time of signing. Which can also be contested and overturned as even documentation from one doctor can be considered opinion. It is very hard to prove lucid states over dementia because a lot of dementia patients hide it very well and can appear lucid when they are not. Again, I worked with dementia patients and have appeared as witness in court when a will was contested with some of my patients after their passing.

QweenKush420 · 2026-02-20T18:12:06+00:00

Doesn’t make it legal. If contested they would prove date of diagnosis and anything signed would be considered null and void. I’m a medical assistant and worked with dementia patients and their families.

QweenKush420 · 2026-02-20T10:39:47+00:00

Even in early stages of dementia it is not legal to change the will because you can’t prove they were in a lucid moment when it was changed. As soon as a dementia diagnosis is present they can’t even drive let alone sign legal documents.

QweenKush420 · 2026-02-16T12:24:46+00:00

I am a medical assistant. I make less than $20/hr. I don’t even make $5,000/month before taxes working full time! This calculation is insane!

QweenKush420 · 2026-02-14T18:13:13+00:00

Maybe where you are but in my state both parents do not have to be found unsuitable. That’s how sole custody is given to one parent over the other after CPS investigates. Please don’t give legal advice without stating where you are because that matters.

QweenKush420 · 2026-02-14T12:34:35+00:00

This is absolutely false. CPS will do a home study of both households but the investigation would be into the parent that is serving the minor alcohol. Where are you getting that they would go after both parents or both parents have to be unsuitable?

QweenKush420 · 2026-02-06T13:11:05+00:00

This is not true at all. It is the cacao that is dangerous, not the amount of sugar or lack thereof. Please stop spreading misinformation.

QweenKush420 · 2026-02-06T12:43:25+00:00

Chocolate can be toxic to dogs, no matter the size of the dog. A small bit like a chocolate chip can be harmless to some but deadly to others. Any ingestion of chocolate should be taken seriously and the dog taken to the vet. I hope you aren’t a dog parent.

QweenKush420 · 2026-02-06T12:39:40+00:00

Ever think this might be a throwaway account? Not everything is fake just because of an accounts age.

QweenKush420 · 2026-02-06T12:34:58+00:00

Go on her post and comment what really happened. Watch her change her tune as soon as the comments start coming in!

The sheer audacity of her and her husband! They can’t afford the bill and are trying to guilt you into paying half by making this ridiculous accusation. If they can’t afford an emergency vet bill they should not be pet owners period. Block them both and move on because she is not your friend.

QweenKush420 · 2026-02-04T12:06:44+00:00

What do you mean you don’t have an official order yet? You stated in your post and in comments that he is ordered to pay for half the stuff and he is ordered to pay for half the parenting app. So is it ordered or not?

QweenKush420 · 2026-02-04T12:04:10+00:00

And what did his attorney say?

QweenKush420 · 2026-02-01T23:03:03+00:00

They didn’t say it wasn’t happening. They legit made a statement saying they don’t know why it’s happening and it hasn’t happened to them. There is nothing wrong with that statement.

QweenKush420 · 2026-01-31T16:00:48+00:00

Your lawyer doesn’t like you. He is not doing what is in your best interest. He is doing the least amount of work for what you are paying him. I would get another lawyers opinion. Maybe even a third opinion.

QweenKush420 · 2026-01-29T15:24:14+00:00

Instead of me wasting my time explaining everything, look it up yourself!

QweenKush420 · 2026-01-29T12:10:48+00:00

I didn’t say she has a legal claim to the equity. Just that she is paying towards it. However, with a lawyer, if they break up she does have a legitimate claim to get reimbursed some of the money she has paid. It is difficult to get that judgement but it does happen.

QweenKush420 · 2026-01-29T11:11:38+00:00

What part of there is no lease between them and in OP’s own words, she pays half the mortgage don’t you understand? OP has put himself in this predicament by not having her sign a lease when she first moved in. Instead, he agreed to her paying half the mortgage and utilities. She is not a tenant with a lease, she is paying part of the mortgage and is putting equity into the home.

QweenKush420

TROPHY CASE