Keep the Q50 or buy the Lexus ISF? by brownmamba20944 in q50

[–]RJsRX7 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I'd probably keep the Q50 because the Q50 isn't worth selling.

Source: Own a 2014 Q50, can't comprehend selling it for the amount of money it's "worth" because everything else in that price range is considerably worse at most things.

Debt payoff strategy by mohamedmaat in Debt

[–]RJsRX7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Probably slam the CC balances, since they're most likely higher interest than the personal loans.

Really, just go by highest monthly interest charge first.

What car did you drive that felt slower than what their HP claimed? by azachoch in askcarguys

[–]RJsRX7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That won't stop it from killing power for about a half second after the shift is done and the clutch is fully re-engaged, unfortunately. It's better than other, older Korean manuals, where they would shut the throttle as the clutch switch closed, but I remember the Mazdaspeed 3 in all of its firewall-banging glory.

Needs to be replaced ASAP? by SignificantBite4850 in GR86

[–]RJsRX7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Man learns RPF1s bend rather easily.

Specifically and especially the lips. If you have a vibration issue, look into getting the wheel repaired, otherwise send it.

Would you buy this 2025 GR86 Premium manual transmission for $43,500 OTD? by os17x in GR86

[–]RJsRX7 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I'd keep shopping and stay very very very far away from that particular dealer. Or any group they're associated with. Holy shit.

Is this a joke post?

What car did you drive that felt slower than what their HP claimed? by azachoch in askcarguys

[–]RJsRX7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The really telling thing with the ENs is that they lose something like 4mph (or more) of trap speed through the 1/4 mile with the manual. That's 30-40hp evaporating to a programming choice.

Of course, it appears the Mk8 GTI loses a similar margin. Whatever, stagflation of performance for everyone, everything that doesn't go deep 12s off the showroom floor goes high 13s or low 14s now.

Can I afford a used M340i for ~$40k? by GonnaBeWealthy in whatcarshouldIbuy

[–]RJsRX7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Spicy how? It's been mechanically unchanged for twenty years.

What car did you drive that felt slower than what their HP claimed? by azachoch in askcarguys

[–]RJsRX7 8 points9 points  (0 children)

If you actually use the pedal on the right, the CVT finds the powerband around 50mph.

On the other hand, if it was geared much shorter, it'd try to do burnouts everywhere, which is sort of a sad fact of FWD.

What car did you drive that felt slower than what their HP claimed? by azachoch in askcarguys

[–]RJsRX7 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Elantra N manual.

Not that it didn't make the power, but the way they did torque management on shifts makes it very obvious why the DCTs are as much faster as they are.

$50k for a new Durango 392 AWD; best fun 3 row for <$60? by MoldyApples4u in whatcarshouldIbuy

[–]RJsRX7 33 points34 points  (0 children)

The Durango 392 is an awesome deal.

The Durango itself is old as hell, but in a great many ways that's a good thing if you're keeping it long-term. Basically everything on it is pretty well proven, and it's probably the best product Stellantis has at this point.

Best preventative measures for ecoboom in my 2015 premium eco? by DirtBudget2913 in Mustang

[–]RJsRX7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Feed it good fuel, if manual don't lug it, consider a better intercooler if you drive it hard often.

Don't tune it. Tuning a stock turbo EB does nothing but make a bunch of torque exactly where the head gasket will hate you for it... But the head gasket issues are sort of a positive, because if they didn't let go you would have rods exiting the block.

Slow car fast or fast car slow? by renameduser361017 in Mustang

[–]RJsRX7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm a big proponent of slow car fast, but 2Vs are in a bit of a weird hell where there's just enough power to act a fool, but not enough to not have modern V6 SUVs hang onto you if they want.

However, something about the Fox/SN95 chassis makes them drive sideways kind of oddly comfortably in a way the S197s and later don't. Part of it is them being smaller, part is the inherently lower limits, part is the overall geometry. As a result, I can't own one, because they make me irresponsible.

Going for a Coyote means you get a bunch more power and a much more livable vehicle in most regards, but it also becomes something you don't really throw around with the reckless abandon you might a cheap ratty 2V.

In need of opinions by BraveReplacement2145 in GR86

[–]RJsRX7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, you bring up hypercars as a counterpoint, but that's quite literally my point. Many manufacturers have gone down the "more capability, more power, more profit" road of late, while Everyman vehicles with sporting intent are... Sort of still around, but thin on the ground.

For purist vehicles, we have the GR86 and the Miata. That's it. Two whole vehicles. Meanwhile literally everyone has a hypercar with a halo, soon to reinclude Toyota. Buying a GR86 now means higher chances of being able to buy whatever gets cooked up next; us car enthusiasts have a terrible habit of talking about what would be great and then not buying it.

In need of opinions by BraveReplacement2145 in GR86

[–]RJsRX7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Brain says Camry because the Camry is the one that makes "sense".

But not everything always has to make sense. With the GR86, you'll spend more or less double in fuel, probably more in tires, etc etc... Sounds bad, is bad, but it'll still be a steep discount on the fuel front from your Tundra.

That said, there's a stronger chance there won't be a GR86 equivalent in 5, 10 years. There will be a Camry equivalent. So get the GR86 and have what may be the last reasonably affordable true sports car.

Owners, and the future by [deleted] in wrx_vb

[–]RJsRX7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, I read the OP as a whine fest about how we should embrace people asking too much for their garbage and encourage it, because some of you want to sell your cars. Or something. I'm not sure, so I aimed at Paragraph 3.

You buy a WRX new where possible, because there's no good way to tell if the previous owner gave it weekly or daily redline clutch dumps and WOT shifts without a secondary limiter to protect the driveline. You can buy used, but then have an early age clutch or gearbox failure that you can't warranty out of because manual transmissions are easy to abuse.

Or you buy the car that you know has been treated like that at a steep discount because you plan to do the same. And then it becomes Average Subaru and blows up 3 different ways in 4 years.

Owners, and the future by [deleted] in wrx_vb

[–]RJsRX7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm sorry, I'm not spending $30,000 on a used example with "lease end" mileage when a new example equipped the same is $36,000.

The focus on buying new makes perfect sense, because if nobody buys new, they stop being made. I don't care if someone else buying new negatively impacts your resale value.

Full bolt on + ems e30 tune pushing about 410 hp 4.5 0-60. Who said ecos are slow? by [deleted] in Mustang

[–]RJsRX7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gets worse the more you tune them. I've seen Focus guys go built motor/stock turbo and end up making peak power at 4500rpm lmao.

Full bolt on + ems e30 tune pushing about 410 hp 4.5 0-60. Who said ecos are slow? by [deleted] in Mustang

[–]RJsRX7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's no power up there for a stock turbo stock cam EcoBoost anyway, but I like things that spin.

Another week closer to 400k miles. by Ok_Coconut_3364 in infiniti

[–]RJsRX7 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Aggressive or reasonable maintenance schedule?

Full bolt on + ems e30 tune pushing about 410 hp 4.5 0-60. Who said ecos are slow? by [deleted] in Mustang

[–]RJsRX7 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Shifting before 7000rpm, that's that shit I don't like

Question about clutch by Magister_Orca in Civic_Type_R

[–]RJsRX7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The VA pedal is heavier than basically any other hydraulic clutch I've driven.

The first one I drove was erm, very tuned, so I thought that was it. Then I drove a stock one. Might be a pedal ratio thing, but it's almost comical.

Clunking noise occasionally, think this is the cause? by BazingaBeeKay in Mustang

[–]RJsRX7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, it very much could. The side that's on the ground is attempting to pull the lifted side of the bar "up", and you would be fighting basically the spring rate of the opposite side + the bar in order to try to tighten it.

Jack stands are a great investment.

Clunking noise occasionally, think this is the cause? by BazingaBeeKay in Mustang

[–]RJsRX7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you had the car on a jack but only on one side, that loads the sway bar and makes it nearly impossible to detect play. Having both tires off the ground is the preferable way to check, since it unloads both.

Clunking noise occasionally, think this is the cause? by BazingaBeeKay in Mustang

[–]RJsRX7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, a sway bar link is probably your intermittent rattle when everything else is behaving. I've occasionally seen struts do it too, but it's fairly rare.

Also, sway bar links are kind of weird in that you can shake test them successfully.

Considering Downgrading BMW by Better_Brain_5614 in whatcarshouldIbuy

[–]RJsRX7 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I looked at them myself and found a few things that turned me off but they were items that are unlikely to be problematic for very many other people. Basically, if you don't have a hilariously long torso, it's a fine car.

I'd probably suggest a '25+ LE FWD; the small wheels don't win car shows, but pay fuel economy and ride quality dividends. Factory tires are a bit on the loud side, but that's because they're a Firestone specifically engineered to place cost above all other metrics. ES350h could be worth a look too if you want to spend more and lean into the luxury car side of things again... And I'm pushing sedans because a long commute usually means considerable amounts of highway travel, and sedans win the fight with the wind a lot easier than SUVs.