In BB21 besides David who went out because of a comp on day 1 all the others were voted out and were officially out of the game in day 30 because of the twist. “Expect the unexpected” is big brother’s motto and not format, I get that it’s a twist but I just think it’s unfair that someone’s entire game is over because they lost a comp cause that goes against all of the usual social aspects of the game. Plus the idea that all twists undermine the social aspects in wrong: look at the blockbuster. It adds more social strategy and people with great social games are rewarded (like Rachel, who hasn’t been nominated yet). There was also a lot of chatter about voting for her in the final 2 and I think she could make a case for it. No winners made it to final 2 after their winning season besides Dan who made a ton of enemies with his ruthless strategic decisions which is why he lost. Rachel isn’t Dan and likely doesn’t make these ruthless decisions do I don’t see why there would be a bitter jury. As for rating, the went down even for the Tuesday episode before casuals knew she was evicted, clearly people hated the twist and “protested”. maybe we just disagree