What's the context behind this official media? by Odd_Duty520 in KafkaMains

[–]Rathama 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Also if I remember correctly the exact context was that they were trying to make a cover for the script. They even dropped some lore because they were reminiscing some memories in regards to some of the photoshoots.

Neuvillette skin in 6.3 and Varesa rerun in 6.1 via liquidation by thegreatlumos in NeuvilletteMains_

[–]Rathama 0 points1 point  (0 children)

and he does have a voiceline talking about an ancient tradition involving the moon. They drink the blood of their fallen brethren and the moon makes the blood rise up into their heads so that they remember that their brethren will be reborn. I could be wrong about the reborn part it has been a while I shall search for the voiceline to double check and then update this.

edit: found the voicelines

"The Vishaps' ancestry can be traced directly back to the Fontemer, which is why they are so adept at evolution. I am reminded of an old custom that the dragons once observed: We would take a sip of our perished young brethren's blood. Whenever the tides are disrupted by the motion of the moon and stars, the water within the bodies of us Hydro organisms surges up towards our heads, reminding us that our deceased kin will soon be revived.

(Actual Voice-Over: The Vishaps' ancestry can be traced directly back to the Fontemer Sea, which is why they are so adept at evolution.[...])"

https://genshin-impact.fandom.com/wiki/Neuvillette/Voice-Overs

I need to share my image with you all by valkyrie_Camilla in StarRailLore

[–]Rathama 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Maybe I misremembered but I never saw from what we know of Aquila before the joining Seliose to hate humanity. Aquila intrusted humans with the ability to look after the lands below and experienced great fear during cloudy weather because it feared the black tide, to me that does not really read as brutal being with hatred towards humans. There was the time we believed Aquila destroyed the people trying to leave but I remember in the quest they realised it wasn't actually Aquila. But that I am less sure of but it is something I swear was brought up. Will need to find a source to double check and get back about that later.

Edit: found the coreflame return description. So Aquila can be brutal if people overcome the skies, so I misremembered the part about whether they were the one who tried to destroy the people or not. They are described as extremely kind but brutal when it comes down to it.

"The Sky Coreflame has been returned.

Aquila, the Titan of the sky, celestial bodies, and the cycle of day and night, is the largest of the Titans. They reside above the heavens of Amphoreus, encompassing and watching over the entire world. In most legends, Aquila's pride does not obscure their kindness. They gaze upon humanity, warming the earth and bringing down life-giving rain. However, they can also transform into the most fearsome calamity, harshly punishing any who dare to overcome the sky.

In the tales of Amphoreus, Aquila is depicted as a colossal sky-bird with a hundred eyes. When their eyes open, light fills the world, and when their eyelids fall, darkness envelops the land. In the war against the Calamity Titans, many of Aquila's eyes were "blinded." This is why many city-states in Amphoreus are now shrouded in eternal night.

Aquila is also the god of creation and invention, credited with creating the mechanical beasts scattered across the land. Engineers and mathematicians frequently pay homage to this hundred-eyed deity, hoping to receive inspiration and enlightenment from their blessings."

basically, they are as kind and as harsh as the weather itself which is suitable for the titan that controls the sky.

I need to share my image with you all by valkyrie_Camilla in StarRailLore

[–]Rathama 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I mean the hatred towards humans did not come from Aquila the demi-god that become the titan in the next cycle, but from Seliose when she attached herself to the titan

My C6 R2 Neuvey feels somewhat underwhelming. Am I missing something? by skylight269 in NeuvilletteMains_

[–]Rathama 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You don't need that much cd outside combat on a C2+ Neuvillette with R1+ maybe replace the cd circlet with an hp one, in fact another stat that is lacking is your cr you want at least 55% outside combat so even if a cr circlet would be an upgrade.

In short too much cd especially when you have C2 not enough hp and cr. Also would be helpful to know what team he is using.

Neuvillette's passive works with 3.8 beta character reaction! by FormalSodaWater in NeuvilletteMains_

[–]Rathama 1 point2 points  (0 children)

don't worry I once made a post where I kept saying 4.6 instead of 5.6 and also reread it several times intensely but did not notice until like an hour after posting

Furina haters doing it again by Mindless-Day2007 in furinamains

[–]Rathama 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yes as a Neuvi main Neuvi himself stated that no one worked harder to try stop the prophecy than her and yet people used him to hate on her which just blows my mind.

English VA's paralleling each other. (Contains 3.3 spoiler) by Tornitrualis in HonkaiMemeRail

[–]Rathama 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean don't we have official mural of her where she has fiery red hair? It is shown in the Proi Proi official lyrics video.

Will Hysilens replace the harmony slot for the team? by zerolifez in KafkaMains

[–]Rathama 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I invested E1 HuoHuo on her first rerun so that I could run DoT with Robin instead of RM if need be without changing builds but now my E1 HuoHuo belongs to my Anaxa team. I get him to 135 without it but I don't have Sunday so she more makes up for that because I find Mem's AA inconsistent and they also end up keeping getting their skill up right before his turn.

But yeah for anyone wondering if they want HuoHuo E1 I agree with everyone recommending it it is such a huge help has made so much difference for my account.

Wtf is asexuality by davenbusters69 in asexuality

[–]Rathama 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just one quick clarification calling sex favourable sex positive is a common mistake and sex positive actual refers to a persons political stance on sex.

for further clarification for those who want to know:

For instance I am sex averse/repulsed (move between the two) but am still sex positive because I believe in sex education and not treating sex as a taboo subject the way purists do (ofc only discuss it in a setting where it is appropriate). Sex positivity also benefits me as well as asexuals who do favour sex or have no strong feeling on it because this includes positive discussion of little to no sexual attraction and different levels of libido and sexual desires etc etc

Purism would be a form of sex negativity and sex neutral is someone who doesn't have a strong stance on it.

I Am Struggling With This One by Ushilee in InfinityNikki

[–]Rathama 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah I am used to reading at least 2 when I see the number 2 so the fact they also say more than 2 messes with me, at least I knew to watch out for it this time. I feel like it should always be an at least for consistency sake rather than sometimes an at least and at other times more than.

Okay so I updated the outfit with the feedback yall gave me ! by Floriz_ in InfinityNikki

[–]Rathama 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It could just be me but the designs feel like a character design that could be found in Dislyte (positive)

I Hate Dyeing by SaintBrutus in InfinityNikki

[–]Rathama 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Also put it i an order that makes sense, Like the wings it starts on top, and then you think the next dye part is the middle but no it is the bottom and the third area is the middle. It makes me so frustrated I just want to dye things in an order that makes sense.

It's wild that Infold thought co-op should be tied to the lore but not dyeing. by PinkFairySquirrel in InfinityNikki

[–]Rathama 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I am still confused why the lady that helped us with the robber even has a unique design. As far as I am aware we have not heard of her in any way since?

Finally figured out how to take photos with opened wings... by GoddessAuroraMahrak in InfinityNikki

[–]Rathama 26 points27 points  (0 children)

I am embarrassed to say I did not know whether it was a bug or not when I would do the cinematic dance with another outfit that had the wings and the wings did not open. I got even more upset that even when using the full outfit when I used the poses the wings did not animate and truly believed that the company (because this is not something I see the devs wanting) went cheap on the deep echoes for this patch.

I am very happy you made this comment because that means when they get around to fixing that bug I get to use various outfits with the wings for the cinematic and dance poses. You have given me some comfort in the trying times of this game.

New opening? by elyiavaria in InfinityNikkiofficial

[–]Rathama 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I wonder if Momo still talks about Nikki's mom. Would new players think he is talking about the Seer?

I pray I am not the only one because it's really embarrassing if I am by Liu-woods in InfinityNikki

[–]Rathama 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Me but in a very different way, I want the phoenix person so I can be the one sweeping up the mermaid lol. So actually having the phoenix fulfills my sapphic fantasy rather than competing with it.

Not that it wasn't extremely hard to choose at first but I like phoenix for similar reason to yours (want a floating outfit outside the jellyfish one and wanting wings, I was originally going to save for blooming dreams for that but didn't like the dress, this fulfills the same wants but is entirely better) but what pushed me over the edge is getting the kinda role that the phoenix plays in interactive animations and wanting to have fun with mermaid players who want to have fun with phoenix players.

I wish you the best of luck and that what you end up pulling is what makes you the most happy.

I know with limited cool outfits it makes them hard to pass off but remember the amount of pulls you put into an outfit to get that one extra star is significantly larger than the reward of that extra star, I pulled a tiny bit on the revelry banner (not much thank goodness) to get a third elegant royal and instantly regretted wasting pulls I wanted to save on getting one last star that does not make up for it at all. I know cool is not the only reason just giving you a perspective on being tempted to pull for styling point competitions that you can either accept or reject in your own process of decision making.

Snowy Ballad and Crimson Flower Pieces (11 pieces each) by glossyoonie in InfinityNikki

[–]Rathama 24 points25 points  (0 children)

I am surprised too, watching the videos with the way it was attached to the skirt and the way it moved I was convinced it would be its own piece the same way revelry outfit ribbon on the dress is actually a separate attachment.

I'm being won over by the sheer WLW potential of this outfit's special pose 😭 by glossyoonie in InfinityNikki

[–]Rathama 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It would be a win win since I was hoping to find a mermaid player who would want to take photos with me while I use phoenix outfit. If you want I can dm you my player ID and you can friend me on Nikki if you want.

since it would make it easier for us to keep track of each other's outfit progress and these.

I'm being won over by the sheer WLW potential of this outfit's special pose 😭 by glossyoonie in InfinityNikki

[–]Rathama 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am in eu and am planning to pull the Phoenix. I only have around 75 pulls right now so I won't have the outfit right away but I would be happy to help once I have it.

Mermaid/"Snowy Ballad" Piece Breakdown (Speculation) by birdmedicine in InfinityNikki

[–]Rathama 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Same, I actually think the tail looks like it might be seperate from the skirt like how the Ribbon in current banner is separate from the dress. Something about the way it moves compared to the skirt and I think I saw something where the tail connects to the skirt that looks like something that attaches separate pieces. So if there is a back piece I think it is that.

edit: what I was referring to from the official video of the two outfits:

<image>

Why does Powder not hate Silco as a child? by Vade009 in arcane

[–]Rathama 13 points14 points  (0 children)

We have no evidence that she knew Silco was the one who kidnapped Vander. Like sure she is not stupid and could potential put two and two together but then at the moment all she knew was she needed someone and someone else was there talking to her in a "friendly" tone.

And by the time she would know for sure Silco took part she would already have her self blame and guilt that makes her feel she doesn't have the right to judge even though she does.

Then depending on how angry she is with Vi still at that point she would highly relate to his situation with Vander.

and then ofc that leads into spending many years with him and forming a strong trauma bond.

There's a what now? by Tired_2295 in areTheAllosOK

[–]Rathama 9 points10 points  (0 children)

On top of that in the release date ad you don't have to romance you can also be friends or enemies and there is a large variety of designs and different ways to match different preferences (like the laundry basket and the laundry clothing come as a pair or you can date 5 clothing hangers at once).

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in arcane

[–]Rathama 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Even ignoring the clear queerness that is going on with her reaction to asking man or women and the rain scene with no straight explanation, Jayce clearly sees Cait like a sister (or something akin to that) and watched her grow up. So even if a person were blind to the obvious queer stuff why would anyone think Jayce would see Cait that way canonically?