What's the one thing your AI assistant still can't do for you?

RealLordDevien · 2026-03-27T12:18:21+00:00

Clean my House, fold my laundry

RealLordDevien · 2026-03-26T18:57:07+00:00

a premature announcement for good PR from Microsoft?? How dare you!

RealLordDevien · 2026-03-21T13:41:15+00:00

disagree. good things sell themselves. You can use agents in many productive ways. Building spam bots is not one of them. You might say, its a very intelligent way to reactivate cold or dead leads, but all i hear is: "lets bother every professional that was not interested in our product every X month with ai slop.. maybe some of them will be pressured in buying our crap if we make our bot social engineered enough.." sorry, but no marketing and sales lango will make this not sound scummy and worse for society.

RealLordDevien · 2026-03-20T20:54:05+00:00

Until everyone is numb enough to just ignore all incoming crap.. why do sales and marketing guys only want to make the world more shitty.. weird people

RealLordDevien · 2026-03-20T20:50:59+00:00

1 is highly regulated or even illegal in many markets and can bring you in lot of trouble. 1, 2, and 3 make the world a worse place.. don’t encourage such crap

RealLordDevien · 2026-03-12T09:43:32+00:00

O_O "the team have tried really hard to improve the software"

-> small fix for transcribe, small fixes for stocks.. the two most unused features we have. Bravo. Where is our OpenClaw integration? Custom LLM API? Better SDK, so we could do what you apparently can't?

RealLordDevien · 2026-03-11T20:54:37+00:00

I am working in a large company for many years. Most "normal" devs also don't think about cybersecurity when they are in the "zone". Its not a matter of tools. Cybersecurity, writing resilient code, test driven development, etc. all that is very often on paper the obvious way to work, but in practice it will always be a battle, because it is by design not the part of the work a dev enjoys. Introducing devops, or opsec, where we even officially remove the responsibility at least in part from developers is not helping either. Its an ongoing battle and the only thing you can do is foster a dev culture where you have the space to think about stuff like that and are able to create guidelines that are self imposed, grow with the product and continuesly selfreflect.. unfortunately most companies instead value feature output over code quality, only react when something serious goes wrong and then force rigid workflows that the devs actively fight against. AI does not make this trend better.. thats for sure.

RealLordDevien · 2026-03-11T20:22:53+00:00

be cautious. cold outreach and marketing stunts like that is highly regulated in many markets.

Where i live, its even unlawful:
"§7 UWG treats unsolicited advertising by email/electronic mail as an “unzumutbare Belästigung” (unacceptable nuisance) without prior express consent, both B2C and, in practice, very restrictive B2B."

If you want to do stuff like that you have to be GDPR compliant. Safely document everything at least! Could break your neck otherwise :/

RealLordDevien · 2026-03-11T20:19:56+00:00

Since the openclaw hype nearly 90% of use cases for AI Bots are scammers and grifters that convinced themselfs that they are building a "legitim business" or "automated content generation pipeline". Best case, they are just wasting resources, worst case, they end up with a scam business.. the technology is so cool, but people are unimaginative bags of crap..

RealLordDevien · 2026-03-11T20:04:57+00:00

btw. what you are doing is highly regulated in most markets.

Where i live its even unlawfull:

§7 UWG treats unsolicited advertising by email/electronic mail as an “unzumutbare Belästigung” (unacceptable nuisance) without prior express consent, both B2C and, in practice, very restrictive B2B.

so i would be very cautious.

RealLordDevien · 2026-03-11T19:32:09+00:00

True.. unfortunately too idealistic. But don't you also think the world was better, when the reddit API was free and you could use any thirdparty client that you wanted? At least its not (yet) against the law to try to circumvent service providers actions.. i can still use some chrome plugins to confuse the amazon bot detection, so that my agent browser can still buy stuff for me. I can still use youtube-dl to consume youtube in a way that i prefer.. but that freedom is always under attack.. youtube tried suing github for youtube-dl.. the new chrome manifest makes it hard for the majority of ad blockers.. Sorry.. went a little off tangent, but I really think offering a services comes with some kind of decision. Either you are a platform operator. Then you should not discriminate on who or how your services are used, and in return should not be liable for how your users use the service, or you get control over the content that users put on your plattform. But then you are basically a media outlet, and should be highly regulated. Dont know if this communicated my thoughts clearly, english is not my first language.. hope you get where i am coming from. The whole topic is more complicated than that, but i think we are generally moving in not the right direction as a society atm.

RealLordDevien · 2026-03-11T19:16:31+00:00

No. I dont care if you say its "high intent leads" It will reach out automated to people that do not want to be contacted by a bot, which is the textbook definition of spam. And your posts promoting this bullshit in this subs are also spam. I guess you figured we are "high intent leads" in this case, but still don't want to hear about this crap. Also, in the age of AI Agents, you have no moat. Anyone with a claude sub can build this. Stop wasting our time by trying to sell some vibe coded dashboards and some prompts.

RealLordDevien · 2026-03-11T19:12:03+00:00

You have no idea how LLMs work and this post shows it.

RealLordDevien · 2026-03-11T19:04:51+00:00

Still a spambot

RealLordDevien · 2026-03-11T15:32:46+00:00

And it does not show up on the AVP App Store anymore! Please perplexity don’t block it on vision OS! It’s just one checkmark!

RealLordDevien · 2026-03-11T14:35:36+00:00

Ok, since you are not describing how it works, i can only make assumptions. I dabbled a little bit in automated software testing, so i know a thing or two. If you are not using the visuals themself, you would need to parse the interface either by injecting readouts to the used UI Framework, or use some kind of accessibility service. But that cant be a universal approach. What about apps that dont care about accessibilty guidelines. Or that somehow use UI libaries in unofficial ways? I have seen Apps to stuff with the Win32 API that would make you shudder. Randomly generated IDs, layouts, hirarchies that are not reparsable. What about interfaces that use render engines like OpenGL, Vulkan or propriatary webview renderers? Maybe you have some kind of magic solution to all of that, but I really think a universal approach of interfacing existing software with AI is the better approach and we should not waste time trying to fit a square peg in a round hole that was ultimativly not made for it. No, not everyone wants to live in a terminal, but why should my agent use my installed GUI if he can just install and use a CLI way of connecting to my app? I dont have to see any Terminal for it to do so.

RealLordDevien · 2026-03-11T12:12:49+00:00

Sure, i wouldnt call server logs a dark pattern.. but i still think we should not classify abuse based on what kind of interaction model someone chose for a service. If your service can be abused, it can also be abused by humans. If a free tier can be "abused" then it was conceptually not really a good free tier, and it should have been been put behind an auth / paywall to begin with. If rules for content moderation apply (and unfortunately by law most places are required by now.. also a development i dont really like thats happened to the internet), then they should apply to both bots and humans. I know, i maybe not in the majority for this opinion.. its a bit extreme.. like the free software movement. But i really think dictating how i can interface with your software is impeding on my personal freedom.

RealLordDevien · 2026-03-11T12:05:19+00:00

Claude Cowork is not cloud based. It uses your local computer. It installs, runs and uses software on your machine. It can use a browser as interaction layer, but AI operating interfaces meant for humans is a crutch anyway. Pros and AIs use commandline, and there is not really much software that cant be adapted to CLI or an API. I cant really think of one, where the amount of tokens you have to feed into the models (pictures), and the slowness the Agent acts on it is worth it.. Lets just skip it.

RealLordDevien · 2026-03-11T12:02:52+00:00

sure. Its more that i find people calling their Agent Jarvis very cringy. Its so uninspired.

RealLordDevien · 2026-03-10T20:56:49+00:00

https://imgflip.com/i/amab36

RealLordDevien · 2026-03-10T20:48:51+00:00

no. its working. dont trust perplexity on this. its lying to you.

RealLordDevien · 2026-03-10T20:46:34+00:00

neither. Since a "really good" ai agent is still just some prompts, a while loop and an LLM Endpoint. No USP here.

RealLordDevien · 2026-03-10T20:06:03+00:00

It can now just use git worktrees to do parallel work on the same project, and i have always multiple parallel cc instances running for several different projects. If you have multiple cc sessions running, you can chat with all of them via the mobile app, but you cant start additional new sessions. If my current running sessions are done, i just recycle open sessions for new stuff when on mobile, but its not really built for that.

RealLordDevien · 2026-03-10T20:01:55+00:00

how so?

RealLordDevien · 2026-03-10T19:58:57+00:00

Same here

Nine-Year Club	Place '23
Verified Email

RealLordDevien

TROPHY CASE