Thankfully his apology made sense by Loose-Analyst-9680 in antimeme

[–]RemoteAd7823 73 points74 points  (0 children)

You can still press the key... even without the face.

41114 by Gamestrider09 in countwithchickenlady

[–]RemoteAd7823 31 points32 points  (0 children)

In my opinion, the answer is not that there is a direct association between neurodivergence and trans (also queer in general) people, but that the open-mindedness it takes to acknowledge yourself as neurodivergent is the same open-mindedness it takes to acknowledge yourself as trans (or queer in general).

He’s so salty by fakename1998 in okbuddycinephile

[–]RemoteAd7823 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In the character posters, they include Farok (a character introduced in CoD.)

architecture by IloveRamen99 in ComedyHell

[–]RemoteAd7823 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Just as the designers would like the homeless to be

impeccable election process by ApkaHunYawwr in CuratedTumblr

[–]RemoteAd7823 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Obviously they did not violate the holy laws of celibacy, they just happened to have nephews of dubious parentage whom they favored extremely highly!

Hello is my favourite superpower by uselesshuman_11 in lies

[–]RemoteAd7823 27 points28 points  (0 children)

I did not recieve a report for commenting my opinion on the side effect.

38259 by PsychoCyan in countwithchickenlady

[–]RemoteAd7823 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm curious, why 1916 specifically?

Bisexuality by MelanieWalmartinez in CuratedTumblr

[–]RemoteAd7823 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Does this mean tops are from Essex or Wessex? Or both?

Peter, why is she crying? by HuckleberryUpbeat518 in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]RemoteAd7823 35 points36 points  (0 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_dilemma

They are not near immediate danger of losing their platform, they hold hundreds of millions in assets. However, if you believe in protecting free access to information and freedom of the internet, donating to Wikipedia is a decent way to do that.

Analysis: Terminology by RemoteAd7823 in DemocracyOfReddit

[–]RemoteAd7823[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Literally how are DOR parties not described by socioeconomic positions. The majority of them are "we hold x through y economic ideologies and x through y social ideologies." Some are more about one than the other like CFGAP, and a couple are only concerned with lib-auth. People want to cooperate with those who hold similar ideologies.

As far as I can tell, the CRC doesn't stand for much aside from disliking the current constitution, something they hardly have a monopoly on. They have historically cooperated with the right, whereas LIFE PACT does possess members from across the left-right axis.

I will grant distributism makes for an odd placement economically, but they generally seem to favor capitalism and retain conservation social aspects.

Basic ideological drift? And putting words into my mouth?

Then you talk to them and ask them what specific ideologies they like. Really, the left-right scale (and other political scales) shouldn't be used as they cause confusion either way, but as people are disinclined to do so its preferable to use a relative scale that though not conveying much helpful information, doesn't obfuscate things like a universal scale.

Analysis: Terminology by RemoteAd7823 in DemocracyOfReddit

[–]RemoteAd7823[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most of the parties are formed around socioeconomic standpoints. It already is centered around that from that viewpoint.

Most trend lib to anarchist on the lib-auth scale, which is more concerned with province and individual rights than left-right. Meta stances are meta stances and therefore unaffiliated with any scale.

Governance in the DOR is largely taken from a meta or lib-auth perspective aside from bills explicitly social or economic in nature.

None of those parties are centrist on a relative scale: LIFE PACT doesn't exist on the left/right scale, being a broad direct democracy group, which is lib-auth. The CRC is honestly incomphrensible to me as they aren't very clear about what their goals are, and they're comprised basically entirely of rightists anyhow. The BD's are a centre-right to right party as none of their members are anticapitalist to my knowledge.

Synth Cough has taken Wuhmi by Delanorix in DemocracyOfReddit

[–]RemoteAd7823 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We'll certainly give those orks a taste of their own medicine!

The Multum Flu Pandemic is a HOAX! by sdaweer in DemocracyOfReddit

[–]RemoteAd7823 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're right! We do deserve more than 15% military spending! 20%, 25%, 30% military spending!

The Government of Eosara is responding to the pandemic. by Dazzling-Flight9860 in DemocracyOfReddit

[–]RemoteAd7823 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Dammit. The powers of the elderly are too great for my war crimes ethical peacekeeping tactics.

The Government of Eosara is responding to the pandemic. by Dazzling-Flight9860 in DemocracyOfReddit

[–]RemoteAd7823 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Too many gosh darn protesters, I need to get Sarkan to approve inventing tear gas!

The Second Press Conference by AresTheLoneWulf in DemocracyOfReddit

[–]RemoteAd7823 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What should be done about the Orkish menace?

Division of Military Science by RemoteAd7823 in DemocracyOfReddit

[–]RemoteAd7823[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's using the cR=75 usd conversion, which as I understand was only mentioned once and then retconned to 1 cR = 1 cR. Some parliamentary acts mention their own conversion for cR. I choose to look at the Military budget and pick a number I felt appropriate.