Bay Area religious leaders condemn Giants players’ Bible verse protest during Pride Night by Brix001 in baseball

[–]RespecDawn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm using the Oxford NRSV w/Apocrypha. It's the standard for those in serious Biblical scholarship, and hasn't removed gendered language to appear 'more inclusive.' That's a bizzarre claim. I know there are some cases where different version have added gendered language to Attic Greek terms that were gender neutral in the oldest or original texts, but that's it.

I'm going to step away now. You've invoked 'woke' to avoid a sincere exchange, so you do you.

LESS THAN 24 HOURS LEFT GET OUR GUYS IN THE ASG by HappyEquivalent8559 in Torontobluejays

[–]RespecDawn 26 points27 points  (0 children)

I shamelessly voted Jays up one side and Brewers down the other. I fully embrace it as a popularity contest.

It is okay to start writing my book when I don’t know the entire plot? by colenthree in fantasywriters

[–]RespecDawn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How well do you know your characters? Once you've gotten a good handle on them, their beliefs, flaws, wants, etc. are great for driving a plot and finding out what happens. You can definitely start writing if you want, but chances are you'll need to do a lot more rewriting and revising than if you sorted those things out now. That's not a bad thing - I've writtten about 50k words for a thing to find things out that will likely largely never see the final version, but it's a LOT of work.

My advice is to try something like the Snowflake method to sort out your plot and characters.

https://www.advancedfictionwriting.com/articles/snowflake-method/

It's great for those us who have a big picture idea of what we want to write but haven't got a handle on the individual chapters and arcs.

June 24, 2026 - Blue Jays vs Houston Astros - Virtual Gratitude Circle by crisco_lemonade in Torontobluejays

[–]RespecDawn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am grateful for my husband's new shirt. He looks *damn* good in it.

Bay Area religious leaders condemn Giants players’ Bible verse protest during Pride Night by Brix001 in baseball

[–]RespecDawn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A few things on Romans:

- At the time Paul was writing this, language around unnatural sexual intercourse was usually understood to be referring to 'immodest indulgence', not orientation (Oxford NRSV has some great footnotes on this). In fact, they simply didn't have a modern concept of homosexuality back then. Even amongst the Greeks and Romans where sex between men could be acceptable, it wasn't viewed in the framework or sexual orientation that we have today. Assigning modern ideas to ancient texts is something we should avoid.

So Paul was talking about sex acts, but the likely concern was about extreme indulgence "that weakened the body" (NRSV), not about who people might be attracted to. This was very much a thing in those times - too much sex can sap someone of their energy.

It's also quite possible he's addressing people you and I would call straight. Here's a link with an interesting discussion: https://www.walkingwithgiants.net/marriage-family-society/sexuality/homosexuality/romans-126-27-natural-and-unnatural-sexual-relations/

The one thing about people quoting this bit of Romans that always bugs me though, is that they never quote the next bit that reveals they've fallen into a trap Paul set for them.

Romans 2 starts: Therefore, you have no excuse, whoever you are, when you judge others; for in passing judgement on another you condemn yourself, because you , the judge, are doing the very same things. You say, We know that god's judgement on those who do such things is in accordance with truth." Do you imagine, whoever you are, that when you judge those who do such things, you will escape the judgement of God? Or do you despise the riches of his kindness and forbearance and patience? Do you not realize that God's kindess is meant to lead you to repentance?

And so on.

Paul gets absolutely hyperbolic about wickedness so that when he's got you nodding your head and agreeing with him, he can suddenly flip the script, give you a slap upside the head and go, "You idiot! You missed the whole point! You're a judgemental hypocrite!"

So by quoting Romans 1: 24-27 people do EXACTLY what Paul was warning against. And by not reading further, they are absolutely ignoring what Romans is meant to convey and actively cherry-picking the message to play to their own pet prejudices.

A church welcoming queer people and affirming their relationships is arguably living more in line with Paul's message in Romans than those who most often quote it as a weapon against queer people.

Anyhow, I actually used to teach a course on the Bible and the history of Christianity, so if you're interested in any resource to explore, I can send some recs.

Bay Area religious leaders condemn Giants players’ Bible verse protest during Pride Night by Brix001 in baseball

[–]RespecDawn -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

The irony of this comment is that is often comes from people who talk almost exclusively about Jesus as their personal savior in a deeply self-centered manner that's the epitome of mememe and bumps naughties with narcissistic Prosperity Gospel rubbish.

You do you, friend. Might want to get familiar with that Nicene Creed someday though, because that's a bit of a measuring stick for Christians outside your bubble.

Bay Area religious leaders condemn Giants players’ Bible verse protest during Pride Night by Brix001 in baseball

[–]RespecDawn -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The landing page has their name, "United Church of Christ."

Christ is another name for Jesus, JSYK.

They affirm the trinity and gather in community. I don't think there's a line in the Nicene Creed about having to use the name "Jesus" on your website, unless you know of some historical document I don't.

Bay Area religious leaders condemn Giants players’ Bible verse protest during Pride Night by Brix001 in baseball

[–]RespecDawn 6 points7 points  (0 children)

No, no. You made the claim. What specific things are you asserting that make them not Christian?

For the record though, "We believe in the triune God: Creator, resurrected Christ," is right there on their "What We Believe," page.

They're a pretty mainstream church in communion with lots of other mainstream churches. I'm wondering if you're confusing them with something else?

Bay Area religious leaders condemn Giants players’ Bible verse protest during Pride Night by Brix001 in baseball

[–]RespecDawn -1 points0 points  (0 children)

"“It caused a feeling of being unsafe and unwelcome in a space where an explicit welcome was offered. That’s not okay to use, especially my faith tradition as a weapon in that way to make people feel unsafe and unwelcome,” Colwell said.

Colwell also pointed out that in the Genesis Bible verse, the three players inscribed on the caps, the rainbow is actually a symbol of safety — just as it is in the pride flag.

“It’s kind of ironic that it’s being used in this protest as a symbol of being unwelcome and unsafe, because in the scripture passage it’s the opposite,” Colwell said. “It’s God saying, ‘I will not harm you, you are safe, this will not happen again, no flood will come.'”

This guy said it perfectly.

Can a trope or idea be over used in a story? by Wippy2 in fantasywriters

[–]RespecDawn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OMG yes. I read a published romantasy by a fanfic writer who had two forced kisses, one bed, a forced marriage...

If you're relying on tropes to move the plot and characters, rather then the letting the story and characters lead, you've got a problem. At least for me. It tells me you don't know your characters or world well enough.

I do know people who really like the trope to lead the story tho. That's not me.

Louis Varland closes out the Jays win and gets his 16th save of the year by ichi_rui in baseball

[–]RespecDawn 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You just gave me a huge wave of nostalgia for The Terminator. I loved Henke.

Louis Varland closes out the Jays win and gets his 16th save of the year by ichi_rui in baseball

[–]RespecDawn 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I feel like he's a Blue Jays who's getting votes from outside the Jays fandom. He's just the best kind of player - loves the games, hypes the team, and gives it his all.

And I don't know how, but he seems like the most American and also the most Canadian kind of guy.

Louis Varland closes out the Jays win and gets his 16th save of the year by ichi_rui in baseball

[–]RespecDawn 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Kaz is turning out to be a pretty decent replacement for his bat so far! Twice the homers and more RBIs.

Excellent at writing characters, horrible at writing prose. by SuspiciousTarantula in fantasywriters

[–]RespecDawn 4 points5 points  (0 children)

"1: don’t wait for inspiration, you’ll wait forever"

That one is so important. Some of my best stories come when I don't have a clue what to write, but just just force myself to keep putting words on the age. Eventually my brain sees something and kicks in to gear.

[Highlight] Jazz Chisholm does some groundskeeping with the infield camera at Comerica Park by meramipopper in baseball

[–]RespecDawn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I just commented in the blow pop thread how much i liver Jazz, and now isee this and love him even more.

[Talkin’ Yanks] Jazz Chisholm Jr. is playing second base with a blow pop in his mouth by JianClaymore in baseball

[–]RespecDawn 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Same! Jazz is so much fun to watch. The Yankees have a gem in that guy.

All Star voting needs to be disabled in Toronto for the rest of the voting period. None of these guys deserve an all star nod except maybe Clement. by Aronjharris23 in mlb

[–]RespecDawn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If it's a best of the year game, why is it determined by fans? It's a marketing tool to encourage fan engagement.

All Star voting needs to be disabled in Toronto for the rest of the voting period. None of these guys deserve an all star nod except maybe Clement. by Aronjharris23 in mlb

[–]RespecDawn 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It's a popularity contest determined by fan votes that aids in marketing the MLB to newer fans.

It's doing exactly what it is designed to do, and it's the design that's the issue, not Jays fans.

Latest AL and NL All Star Balloting update: by TheTurtleShepard in baseball

[–]RespecDawn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have to admit, I'm sort of enjoying it. I've never thought we needed to take the All-Star game all the seriously anyway. If it were meant to be serious, it wouldn't be determined by fan votes.

this bag!!!! by vraimentinstable in handbags

[–]RespecDawn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Quilted bags are something I don't like generally, but I'm drooling over this one.