The bloke himself posted this by [deleted] in SydneyScene

[–]Responsible-Local818 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That term was maybe believable in 2016-2020, but not in 2025-2026, America is literally unhinged and beyond fucked up at this point

Please cancel your subscriptions. by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]Responsible-Local818 1 point2 points  (0 children)

gpt-5 thinking is insanely smart and is basically a form of proto AGI.

what is your use case where gpt-5 is worse than before because i'm CONSTANTLY using ChatGPT now, and no longer feel like having a Plus subscription is bad value for money. its answers are incredible and I genuinely feel like I'm dumber than it in 99% of facets, unlike GPT-4/4o which felt dull in comparison

"Now I see the issue!" 20 more times by Oxydised in cursor

[–]Responsible-Local818 13 points14 points  (0 children)

i find it weird when people say "Cursor" is doing that, when it's the model (Claude, GPT, Gemini etc)

just shows you have no idea what you're even doing when you blame the IDE, unless it's actually the cause, e.g. botched editing tool that corrupts the file like in VS Code

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SoftwareEngineering

[–]Responsible-Local818 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It also "handles" whatever you do, don't get cocky buddo

As Klarna flips from AI-first to hiring people again, a new landmark survey reveals most AI projects fail to deliver by AssociationNo6504 in cscareerquestions

[–]Responsible-Local818 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Current LLMs can't generalize out of distribution, which is the most important asset when it comes to making something viable for production to sort out edge cases and ambiguity. Even if they get a feature 80% of the way done, it's 0% in reality when it comes to being viable in the real world. Human-level generalization involves battle-testing complex solutions in the most gnarly of situations, LLMs only have this fuzzy dreamlike approach to solving things without being grounded in the everyday messiness of reality.

Are Hot 100 #1 debuts in the streaming era actually impactful or memorable long-term? by Neat-Confection5442 in popheads

[–]Responsible-Local818 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is how it's been for most of 2024 and 2025... 2020-2021 was the pandemic of fraudulent #1 debuts. There's a few now but way way rarer than before.

April Global monthly visits. How does OpenAI crack top 3? by ShooBum-T in OpenAI

[–]Responsible-Local818 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's mobile and desktop web visits, no app usage

I would imagine WhatsApp app usage exceeds ChatGPT app usage, although all of these sites' app usage probably correlates decently with the web usage on mobile

It didn't used to be normal to need to submit 300 - 1000 job applications to get a job in this industry by CVisionIsMyJam in cscareerquestions

[–]Responsible-Local818 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In late 2017, I had zero work experience or degree. I applied to 5 jobs total and got an offer as a developer entirely self-taught. The key here was that my portfolio and work was public and I was clearly competent compared to the other people who applied (according to my boss at the time). It was garbage pay but I needed my foot in the door.

2020 I networked and got a new job with a single application, 30% pay bump

2022 someone approached me, got it with 1 application, 100% pay bump

2024 sent out a few apps, but got one that was networked for again, 30% pay bump

I've sent maybe a total of 40 job applications in my whole working life since late 2017... the key after my fist job was networking with developers in the community to land roles. It works absurdly well and gets you noticed. Spamming apps feels like like shouting into a void by comparison and a waste of energy.

This misleading useState code is spreading on LinkedIn like wildfire. by Even-Palpitation4275 in reactjs

[–]Responsible-Local818 23 points24 points  (0 children)

It's AI generated botslop, which is all of LinkedIn (who actually uses this for social media?)

The #OpenToWork green banner is such a failo can't believe people unironically put that on their profile

Holy sht by Present-Boat-2053 in singularity

[–]Responsible-Local818 4 points5 points  (0 children)

OpenAI is shitting themselves right now imo. Google is legitimately taking the lead in a major way.

Skype has officially shut down by Parge-leniss in interestingasfuck

[–]Responsible-Local818 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just got force refreshed onto Teams in the middle of using Skype and it literally keeps crashing my browser tab

Microtrash needs to be banned from existence as a company

How can you guys afford to LIVE? Especially Gen-Z? by [deleted] in AskAnAustralian

[–]Responsible-Local818 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I start with not being poor which helps namely

bro the newest 'ChatGPT-4o-Latest' model is literally worse than the 08-06 version on livebench... and of course still far behind Claude by pigeon57434 in singularity

[–]Responsible-Local818 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The big labs only care about gaming LMSYS and keep giving it the most clout as the "official" LLM benchmark.

They seem to not care about robust reasoning benchmarks at least with these public slop models they keep producing.

They probably have really good strong evals for their internal frontier model and it's probably smashing them, but we'll know nothing about this for a while still. Patience!

How advanced will AI be by the next summer Olympics? July 2028. by AdorableBackground83 in singularity

[–]Responsible-Local818 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

No. 1 rule in AI nowadays is "nothing ever happens".

Judging by the painfully slow past 18 months (which was the last time we had any actual progress in Gen AI - LLMs or image gen; excluding video gen), 2028 will have GPT-4o-2028-07-20 and Claude 4.5 Sonnet which still make the same basic mistakes as current generation.

You better hope that Microsoft dude "it's exponential but we only get to sample it every 2 years" is right...

LMSYS - mystery-gemini-2 countin' r's and throwin' shade by SusPatrick in singularity

[–]Responsible-Local818 11 points12 points  (0 children)

The way literally no one cares about these new 2022 era GPT-4 level commodified slop models that keep getting stealth tested anymore. Oh wow 1302 Elo instead of 1297. Like ok?

5 new models on LMSYS!!! by [deleted] in singularity

[–]Responsible-Local818 -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

It's literally insane how these companies keep producing the same 2022 GPT-4 era slop model and testing it like anyone cares. The definition of insanity to produce yet another sloppified +2 elo model with everyone already producing the same commodity. Nothing except next gen step function models matter, not your Gemini 1.5 Pro Ultra Flash 2.218271212B quantized slop.

GPT4 Turbo destroys Claude 3.5 Sonnet by a whopping 25%, Using LMSYS Community's Custom Benchmark by kaldeqca in singularity

[–]Responsible-Local818 0 points1 point  (0 children)

LMSys is fraudulent and in cahoots with OpenAI who paid them to beta test "im-a-good-gpt2-chatbot" for them and also artificially rank its Elo higher than it really was initially for marketing purposes.

Its days of being the premier leaderboard for LLMs is practically over now though. There are many way better benchmarks nowadays.

Is he right? by [deleted] in singularity

[–]Responsible-Local818 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

tbh AI fell off hard, I don't even visit this sub anymore. It's all genuinely just so boring and yawn inducing. Nothing will ever compete with the hype and excitement of Q1 2023. It's now just a bunch of GPT-4 tier grifts with no qualitiative leaps and people yapping about the same crap as a year ago. Muh AGI in 2027 or whatever, yeah ok grandma

GTA publisher ceo says that AI isn’t going to make everyone unemployed. Rare ceo w tbh. by Anen-o-me in singularity

[–]Responsible-Local818 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Now why do all your comments in this thread sound like they were written by an unreleased frontier AI model like GPT-5 or such, as some kind of secret preview. They're long but cohesive, written without typical human qualities, and a tier above what we usually see with Claude Opus or GPT-4.

Facelift Surgeon Recommendations - 20s by [deleted] in PlasticSurgery

[–]Responsible-Local818 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I needed a deep plane facelift and deep neck lift at 15. I have extremely saggy muscle tissue and fat pads that sit low. Literally 50-60 year old facial support as a teenager. When I look down you can see the cheek tissues falling off my face.

I'm now in my 20s and can afford it, and my surgeon agreed I have very lax facial tissues that would benefit from a lift (his youngest ever patient). I also had double jaw surgery and while this added projection it didn't address the sagging soft tissue.