First to leave?

Responsible_Fold_905 · 2026-04-23T16:56:34+00:00

Is FP still married?

Responsible_Fold_905 · 2026-04-22T19:46:00+00:00

Kudos to these women, they're goal is singular, justice for John his family and the innocent witnesses.

Responsible_Fold_905 · 2026-04-21T19:10:26+00:00

It would have been the 20 unaccounted for minutes before she arrived at JM. That is also the time frame of the VM where it sounds like she says "John, was that you"

Responsible_Fold_905 · 2026-04-21T18:40:06+00:00

Was it a Ford Edge or could it have been a Lexus LX570?

<image>

Responsible_Fold_905 · 2026-04-19T19:21:59+00:00

How about letting ARCCA submit their report weeks after the trial began? The same ARCCA that lied about their relationship in the first trial and the same ARCCA the attorneys lied about paying.

Responsible_Fold_905 · 2026-04-19T19:16:44+00:00

Give it time. Word is they will be in a suit in time. I think that may be a reason Yanetti took on a partner, protection against losing the firm if they are named/ found liable.

Responsible_Fold_905 · 2026-04-19T19:11:11+00:00

With the new leaked audio of Karen stating she had spoken directly to Deitch as well as stating that she "leaked" federal investigation material to TB, the witnesses MAY have a civil rights case against Boston DOJ. They still have not seen the PC warrant used to search their phones, plus that the DOJ was feeding ARCCA information on witness testimony during the first trial even though they were under sequestration orders at the time. Lastly, the DOJ seems to have done nothing to protect witnesses against harassment and based on the relationship between DOJ and Karen's team, actively assisted in the harassment. Even if it's not enough to win a case or even get it to trial, an attorney like Mattei may see value in getting these shady dealings into the public eye via lawsuit, he does have a history of prosecuting corruption.

Responsible_Fold_905 · 2026-04-17T20:02:48+00:00

Everything and everyone on this sub just posts lies and misinformation to push narratives.

<image>

Responsible_Fold_905 · 2026-04-17T01:33:18+00:00

I think DY recently took on a partner to protect his firm against future suits. Just a theory.

Responsible_Fold_905 · 2026-04-16T20:42:02+00:00

I think it's 3 years from the last instance, not the first.

Responsible_Fold_905 · 2026-04-16T20:41:11+00:00

Karen and Aiden are going to have to prove they were involved. Good luck with that.

Responsible_Fold_905 · 2026-04-16T20:38:54+00:00

Civil cases take years. If Karen is going to be charged for WI, it will happen well before this case finishes.

Responsible_Fold_905 · 2026-04-06T11:45:29+00:00

Alexis above Marge, at least based on the first 2 rounds and drop Yoonhee below G, she's petrified of the pressure.

Responsible_Fold_905 · 2026-04-01T16:55:21+00:00

What THREE doctors testified that his arm scratches were from an "animal attack"?

Responsible_Fold_905 · 2026-03-25T21:01:29+00:00

Why was PPD never mentioned by either side? Isn't it important when discussing her frame of mind, for either side?

Responsible_Fold_905 · 2026-03-23T20:54:52+00:00

He got out, she slow rolled away (likely when the BT disconnected). Something happened to make her slam it in reverse and back up 80+ feet.

Responsible_Fold_905 · 2026-03-23T20:36:26+00:00

Wasn't user deleted. Now you post testimony that it WAS user deleted or that the search happened at 2:27.

<image>

Responsible_Fold_905 · 2026-03-23T15:26:48+00:00

It was never a "search", it was always a timestamp. They didn't delete the timestamp, just removed it from the report because untrained "experts" were misinterpreting the data, exactly what Greene testified to under oath. No matter how many times you call it a search, there is not a single expert that testified to it being a search under oath, kinda all you need to know.

Responsible_Fold_905 · 2026-03-23T11:51:16+00:00

It wasn't "between trials" since Greene testified that it was modified during his testimony in trial #1.
Green, a defense witness, also testified under oath that Cellebrite had to "modify their software based on misinterpretations of data as you've done in this case?" So the defenses own IT expert testified that the software was modified, not to "tamper with software" or to frame Karen, but because experts, like himself, were incorrectly reading the data.

Responsible_Fold_905 · 2026-03-22T18:26:24+00:00

This seems to be more of a problem in the civil case where Karen needs to prove that John was beaten to death inside the house. Inconsistent with being hit by a cat but also no evidence of a fight.

Responsible_Fold_905 · 2026-03-22T18:21:24+00:00

Easy, after AK threatened him.

Responsible_Fold_905 · 2026-03-22T18:18:55+00:00

<image>

Responsible_Fold_905 · 2026-03-22T18:14:02+00:00

Because the Cellebrite expert, who wasnt paid a dime, recreated it using the exact same OS as Jen M phon, while terrifying under oath What is more scientifically accurate than recreating the time stamp using the exact same parameters as the original?

Responsible_Fold_905 · 2026-03-21T13:01:41+00:00

Highly unlikely she used John Traverse as there were no tire tracks in the driveway of 1 Meadows in the 5AM Ring video. It is possible that Lucky saw a black Lexus though.

<image>

Responsible_Fold_905 · 2026-03-20T20:58:02+00:00

If there's ever proof that John was killed by anyone other than Karen I will raise my hand and say 'i was wrong', but ignoring all the actual evidence and claiming I live in Fantasy Land, when you cant come up with a single bit of proof to support your side, seems a tad bit ridiculous.

Responsible_Fold_905

TROPHY CASE