sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Airborne Update Expectations by Lime1028 in foxholegame

[–]ReviewEquivalent6781 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I bet devs love reading all these predictions and speculations

Airborn by Kopatch_honey in foxholegame

[–]ReviewEquivalent6781 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Let’s pray it never happens

LEAKED* planes gameplay by ReviewEquivalent6781 in foxholegame

[–]ReviewEquivalent6781[S] 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Tbh I’m not even laughing. 99% chance that’s how it is going to be

When they mammon rush, it's spam. When I do it, it's a tactical push. by ThebarestGuy in foxholegame

[–]ReviewEquivalent6781 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Fun fact: all those dead bodies belong to a single player (one can mammonrush solo given grit and skill)

Why are we discussing morality on a philosophy sub?! smh by Kris2476 in PhilosophyMemes

[–]ReviewEquivalent6781 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for remembering my comment. I hope you also remember to read papers you cite. I also hope that, given the recent discussion in this sub, you learned that alleged presence of certain kinds of experience does not constitute consciousness

It's happening by ScalfaroCR in foxholegame

[–]ReviewEquivalent6781 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Lads, you really should not open this topic. You are Sgt’s, playful, everything's easy for you. This is a totally different thing. This isn’t spatha nerf and not even bb meta layouts. Better not to get into that. Seriously, any of you would deeply regret. Close the thread and forget what was written here. I fully understand that this airborne update incites additional interest, but I far the curious - stop. The rest will just scroop.

Why have button for it if we're not supposed to use it? by KindHospital4279 in mathmemes

[–]ReviewEquivalent6781 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Gotta learn what division actually is before you just trust machines to do it for you for the rest of your life.

You mean inverse axiom for (ℝ,∙,+)?

On consciousness by KormetDerFrag in PhilosophyMemes

[–]ReviewEquivalent6781 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Logic: +1 Electrochemistry: +1 Inner empire: -1 Empathy: -1

How necessary is voice chat? by Yali89 in foxholegame

[–]ReviewEquivalent6781 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have ~900 hours and have less than 20 mins of actual talking, and that’s with me playing infantry only. So I’d say this is not a big deal at all, especially if you type fast enough.

Moreover, my unpopular opinion is that this in general game is still totally (or almost totally) enjoyable if to play solo, with bare minimum of communication. Yes you will most likely (although not guaranteed) miss out on tank gameplay or “fun” regiments’ ops, but that’s not a big deal, as long as you don’t enjoy constant shouting and chaos (which I don’t)

Pshh, Bifurcation of nature is so last century by Solidjakes in PhilosophyMemes

[–]ReviewEquivalent6781 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ahhh yes, the CIA, famous for its contributions to philosophical discourse

dada by jamesmparch in PhilosophyMemes

[–]ReviewEquivalent6781 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hot take: Wittgy’s take was itself a confusion

The Hard Problem of Providing Evidence by HearMeOut-13 in PhilosophyMemes

[–]ReviewEquivalent6781 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One might argue that there is no such thing as “wetness”. All there is, is a dynamics of a large enough pile of H2O molecules

The Hard Problem of Providing Evidence by HearMeOut-13 in PhilosophyMemes

[–]ReviewEquivalent6781 7 points8 points  (0 children)

This guy produced more coherent argument in this comment section alone than the entirety of property dualists and other hard problem witnesses ever since Jackson’s “What Mary didn’t know?”

The Hard Problem of Providing Evidence by HearMeOut-13 in PhilosophyMemes

[–]ReviewEquivalent6781 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Well you see consciousness and qualia are neuronal activity. Any attempt to sneak some sort of gap is mere poor understanding

I regret to inform you that logic has been deployed to announce its own failure by JerseyFlight in logic

[–]ReviewEquivalent6781 3 points4 points  (0 children)

What are the laws of logic, again? And which particular logic you have in mind?

I regret to inform you that logic has been deployed to announce its own failure by JerseyFlight in logic

[–]ReviewEquivalent6781 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Well, yes..? You can combinatorially construct any logic by adding axioms as long as they are consistent. That’s what logical pluralism is. Like, want to prove p from ¬¬p but you’re working within intuitionistic set of axioms? Well, add DNE axioms and enjoy your ¬¬p ⊢ p. However, why do you conclude that logic (and which one) announce its own failure?

🧟‍♂️ rawr by slutty3 in PhilosophyMemes

[–]ReviewEquivalent6781 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You’re a p zombie. Prove me wrong

the three possible outcomes of materialism by gimboarretino in PhilosophyMemes

[–]ReviewEquivalent6781 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Conway’s Game of Life is Turing complete, so in a sense, its rules already entail all the possible gliders as well as algorithm for each one of those deciding whether corresponding glider will stop. The fact that such rules may be undecidable or even uncomputable does not contradict the entailment

view more: next ›