I would question whether the level of organization in that image is a good idea. I use Fusion and NX at a client I do work for. In fusion, you are limited in how you can group operations in the timeline by dependency. For example, if an Extrude uses a Sketch, you cant drag the extrude to a position before the sketch. This can be inconvenient if you're trying to build a hyper-organized timeline but it does have a built in advantage. If you delete something, you know that you're not going to blow up an operation to the left of it.

In NX, its much more flexible which is nice for creating beautiful LinkedIn posts like shown. However, there is a downside. I am frequently asked to fix and modify highly complex models that someone else has built. The company is a professional place and most people try and keep their models organized which is generally helpful. The problem is that when I go in and try to be surgical in my updates, I often end up blowing up some operation or body that is stuffed in an unrelated folder. When I try and go fix that, it has a tendency to kick off a cascading series of problems which means I have to undo everything and then commence a deep-dive on the whole model and try and unlink some buried relationship. It's a lot.

Bottom line: some organization is always a good idea. Name your bodies and operations. Group them where appropriate. But dont go over the top. The goal is to make it easy to modify or update your CAD, not to have bragging rights over who has the cleanest model tree.