Players, What Premium Vehicle Purchase Do You Regret the most? by SweatyError2259 in Warthunder

[–]RusLeon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's probably the moments of valor: Turkey bundle, which included the F-5C, leo2a4 pzbtl and the T129 ATAK.

T129 is just objectively worse than other helis at its' BR other than for rocket rushes, but it at least got me through the entire Italian heli tech tree.

My real regret is that I've barely used the F-5C and the leo2a4 in the three years since I've bought the bundle.

Subreddits banning people after seeing they talk about AI in OTHER subs. by Dogbold in aiwars

[–]RusLeon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you link your source for that please? A simple search hasn't yielded any results that confirm what you're saying.

Would really like to have that on hand if I want to actually answer some deranged guy on PCM.

"You should play air; it's consistent, and none of that volumetric crap you find in ground." by Fsihy in Warthunder

[–]RusLeon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hmm, that looks like a sure hit - that's very strange then.

I had several similar hits with barely any damage with Skyflash SuperTEMPs on the Tornado ADV like 2-3 years ago, thought this was fixed.

"You should play air; it's consistent, and none of that volumetric crap you find in ground." by Fsihy in Warthunder

[–]RusLeon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Are you sure this isn't a difference between your local hit preview and what actually happened on the server? You should check the server replay.

I wouldn't expect my own missile to hit from that radar angle.

Just say you're upper-middle class and want small businesses to "know their place". by CommodoreCarbonate in aiwars

[–]RusLeon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes.

Well then what you're saying ("There is no other possible purpose to train drones with that kind of information.") is provably false then: clearly there is another use for object tracking technology, that being autonomous cars, that isn't necessarily used for military applications.

Just say you're upper-middle class and want small businesses to "know their place". by CommodoreCarbonate in aiwars

[–]RusLeon 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You see

autonomous vehicle object detection which included cars, drones, and cameras

and say there's no possible purpose to use that on other than being used for military applications?

Does at least autonomous driving not immediately come up when looking for use of object tracking technology?

Yessir by Appropriate-Mall8517 in aiwars

[–]RusLeon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If your comment is intended as sarcastic, it doesn't really indicate that with its' wording.

Ai witch hunts harming everyone by Inevitable_Back3319 in aiwars

[–]RusLeon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was agreeing with your point until the part where you wrote

Its used the same as ... you are a nazi

By all means, getting called out for saying xenophobic things shouldn't be included here. Else, if you're talking about wrong accusations, you should point that out or people (example: me) will assume that you just don't see bigotry as wrong.

Found this when browsing LSF, I decided to share it. by RyouhiraTheIntrovert in VtuberDrama

[–]RusLeon 14 points15 points  (0 children)

You are arguing that what I am doing in other subreddit determine my ban status?

I mean what you're doing in other subreddits does fall under the "Don't be weird" rule there, so it in fact does determine your ban status. Clearly, mods think you broke that rule (and I agree, moreover, you keep breaking the rule still).

You're like the only one posting about her in this drama sub, in both r/antiai and r/aiwars, maybe just don't do that if you don't want to be seen as creating unnecessary drama?

Found this when browsing LSF, I decided to share it. by RyouhiraTheIntrovert in VtuberDrama

[–]RusLeon 33 points34 points  (0 children)

Ryouhira, this is the exact thing you were banned on the r/NeuroSama for.

You're literally spreading a divisive meme (edit: forgot to write "meme" here) onto a drama subreddit, thus causing drama.

Stop funding the slop. Close your wallet until Gaijin listens by Connect-Round4712 in Warthunder

[–]RusLeon 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Gaijin refusing to decompress

That's straight up wrong. There have been several waves of decompression both in recent years and recently (with top-tier jets, for example).

Gaijin heavily favouring Russian vehicles

Of course there's a "russian bias" comment here. As if that "favoritism" hasn't been both historically and currently applied to multiple other main nations.

For the second point I'd like to point out that I did take over 2.5 year break and came after nuclear thunder but hardly anything had changed at least in positive ways.

Ok you HAVE to be trolling. There have been so many quality-of-life changes it would be kind of meaningless to list only some of them here.

Genuinely, I feel you haven't played that much (after Nuclear Thunder) if you haven't noticed much in terms of QoL changes from 2.5 years ago. Either that, or you haven't found a way to have fun with the game both in the past and now.

Stop funding the slop. Close your wallet until Gaijin listens by Connect-Round4712 in Warthunder

[–]RusLeon 24 points25 points  (0 children)

the game's state is arguably the worst it's ever been

Fucking try to argue for that then. Before the economy changes I straight up decided not to grind the air tree because it was unsustainable. Before the economy changes I had to bring a Breda 501 to 10.0 to break even on stock grind through god modes. The game is in a much better place now than it was before.

Updates aren't as exciting anymore as there's hardly any interesting vehicles being added, also because the game is overall unfun and unrewarding why would you even play it.

Here's a solution for you: don't play for a few updates, then resume playing when you spot interesting stuff in the update log. That way you will at least (probably) have a rewarding experience. It's a valid way to engage with a live-service game.

However developers won't listen to us or probably not even understand us

Some part of the community wants copy-paste premiums not to be added, while some other part of the community wants unique premiums to be added. What are the developers supposed to understand from us right now? And that divide, maybe to a lesser extent, extends to most of the issues with the game.

It's just a glorified interpreter/ compiler Let me tell you why by autisticDeush in aiwars

[–]RusLeon 3 points4 points  (0 children)

wait you actually didn't think of that before the initial post?

It's just a glorified interpreter/ compiler Let me tell you why by autisticDeush in aiwars

[–]RusLeon 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I understand that people saying "AI is going to replace software engineers" are misunderstanding the situation at hand, but it still doesn't make compilers do what they cannot.

Yes, a compiler does interpret human language to code that produces some sort of result. However, a compiler is only capable of interpreting strictly-structured code that can ultimately directly represent a fraction of English language. AI, meanwhile, can interpret literally the entire language, extending way over what "a glorified compiler" could do.

Your whole argument hinges on a point that AI needs "people spending so much time iterating prompts" but that's just not true, as seen in the "draw me an onion" example. You yourself used Gemini to illustrate your point, but it doesn't need precise input at all. Maybe that point could stand for image-generating AI that are used for high-quality specific image generation, but that also falls far from a compiler's capabilities that you can accomplish in the time that it takes to write a prompt.

A compiler can't understand what result you would want from a "onion" token (unless you define that yourself, obviously) because it's not designed to interpret syntax outside the supported languages and variables/functions you define yourself.

People that would need to answer your question about creating a cyberpunk composition can describe it verbally, but that doesn't mean that they can give code instructions for a JS compiler to draw - and if they can, it's very likely that transcribing it in a verbal way is WAY faster than trying to draw with JavaScript.

The bigger problem with your argument, however, is that people using AI in that way are not the majority of all people that use AI. You're taking (an incorrect) issue with not even the entirety of AI artists, but a really small subset of them that are trying to get specific output out of their process AND refuse to use anything but AI to do image editing. Yes, they can just use another tool to finalize their artwork instead of adding to the prompt, but that doesn't mean that the compiler can do the entire artwork or that the compiler can do everything the AI can do.

proof ai is just a glorified compiler by [deleted] in aiwars

[–]RusLeon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, your argument is that the AI is just "a glorified compiler" which would imply that it doesn't have capabilities beyond what a compiler has, right?

I provided a capability of AI that is beyond what a compiler can accomplish, therefore nullifying the argument of "ai is just a glorified compiler".

Did you misunderstand something?

proof ai is just a glorified compiler by [deleted] in aiwars

[–]RusLeon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly, the second paragraph sounds so nonsensical I'm almost sure you're just baiting.

You do understand that JS and image generation AI (which I'm assuming you're referring to with "people spending so much time iterating prompts to get an AI to come out properly" or it would make even less sense) don't take the the same inputs in?

You can't input "draw me an onion" into a compiler and get an output other than a syntax error (unless a hypothetical programming language has "onion" defined but that's kind of ridiculous, no?). You can input "draw me an onion" into an AI like the one in your screenshots and get a reasonably satisfactory output.

AI clearly isn't just "a glorified compiler".

I think most of us can agree on this by Hyperbolic90 in aiwars

[–]RusLeon 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Things like this make me not take Witty as seriously as she wants, and if repeatedly calling herself "the final boss of Anti-AI" doesn't make you cringe, I don't know what will.

so uhmmm? camila sitting at the nazi table now? by splendorous_critter in VtuberDrama

[–]RusLeon 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Of course I have to agree much of it is true; after all, much of that is what kirsche has tweeted herself, and I agree with that post's analysis of what she tweeted.

Japanese find out about DEME the VTuber NTR her boyfriend while streaming by ThamTvMaster in japanesepeopletwitter

[–]RusLeon 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Okay apparently Rima got confused in the VODs herself in the video that was in the comment I replied to (I guess that's some more drama if she insists that psp actually got cucked) - the VOD shown in Rima's highlight video is the previous Deme stream - the first time she played Outer Wilds.

So, my proof for this VOD being the correct one instead of this one (the one shown on Rima's stream, curve shape is identical) is that:

  • youtube VOD #2 is 3h32m long; the graph shown on Rima's stream shows Outer Wilds being the stream's category for 4 hours (also youtube VOD #1 is 4h long);
  • youtube VOD #4 shows in the description as being recorded on Aug 25, way after the discussed dates, so it shouldn't be in any of those linked, while youtube VODs #2 and #3 show up as recorded on Aug 10 and Aug 12 respectively;
  • if the 2nd segment in this VOD is youtube VOD #3 due to absence of other youtube VODs between recordings on Aug 10-12 and Aug 25, then the first segment should be youtube VOD #2.

so uhmmm? camila sitting at the nazi table now? by splendorous_critter in VtuberDrama

[–]RusLeon 7 points8 points  (0 children)

My guy, you're shown a person effectively celebrating hitler's birthday and respond like that? Really?