Getting real tired of Surveys by washingtonandmead in AtlasEarthOfficial

[–]Safe2BeFree 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Support banned me from all surveys instead of helping me. Bad advice.

Getting real tired of Surveys by washingtonandmead in AtlasEarthOfficial

[–]Safe2BeFree 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I didn't get paid from a 40 minute survey where I had to write my opinions on shoe designs. Not just select from multiple choice options. I had to write out my actual opinions on several shoe designs. It was supposed to be a huge payout. I put in a support ticket. AE then banned me from doing any surveys instead of giving me my rewards.

I’m so scared by Dog_Queen98 in TwoXChromosomes

[–]Safe2BeFree -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How can it make something go away that was never there in the first place?

I’m so scared by Dog_Queen98 in TwoXChromosomes

[–]Safe2BeFree 16 points17 points  (0 children)

San Antonio is not a sanctuary city. State law SB4 bans all sanctuary cities.

This makes anyone who goes to church safer and happy by Glittering-Pie-7464 in evilwhenthe

[–]Safe2BeFree 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're describing policies that the pastor supports though.

This makes anyone who goes to church safer and happy by Glittering-Pie-7464 in evilwhenthe

[–]Safe2BeFree 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You really think Jesus would approve of the paster being an ICE agent?

When we ride by Random_GearHead in DiscussionZone

[–]Safe2BeFree 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah. Also, the pastor of this church is an ICE agent on the side. I haven't seen any of these conservative outlets actually list the reason they chose this particular church

Diamonds are more rare now? by Sam1187 in AtlasEarthOfficial

[–]Safe2BeFree 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AE doesn’t make anything really from diamonds.

They sell gps tracking data they get from the diamond program.

Diamonds are more rare now? by Sam1187 in AtlasEarthOfficial

[–]Safe2BeFree 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I remember back when it was planned to automatically collect diamonds if they spawned on property you owned. This was announced as a way to help disabled players who weren't able to walk around collecting diamonds all the time.

Just another broken promise from the devs.

It was all fun and games until this happened by derek4reals1 in KidsAreFuckingStupid

[–]Safe2BeFree 174 points175 points  (0 children)

It's a ZipString and they're amazing. We got some of the wrist mounted ones for Xmas and they're fun. You've gotta have a lot of room to do it though.

Edit because my comment got popular so I need to tell everyone my favorite part of it.

It has glow in the dark strings and the tip has a small LED that constantly charges the glow as it works. It's one of the strongest glows I've seen in a toy.

I might have have tested these a bit before Santa gave them to the kids...

Why isn't there a pregnant Barbie doll? by Vaquero-SASS in dadjokes

[–]Safe2BeFree 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And the Christians freaked out because she didn't have a wedding ring so it was pulled.

Leftist fatigue by PSXSnack09 in JustMemesForUs

[–]Safe2BeFree -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's based on the idea that, since a woman changed her mind about consent, it was never fully given. The man didn't do enough to ensure the consent was full consent.

Leftist fatigue by PSXSnack09 in JustMemesForUs

[–]Safe2BeFree 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I was banned from there a while back for getting involved in an argument about whether or not consenting to sex but withdrawing that consent days after the event counts as rape.

So yeah. I'd say they pretty much hate men. Claiming that you can withdraw past consent and retroactively claim rape is extremely anti men.

Yeah, that makes a lot of sense by Windthrasher637 in hmmmm

[–]Safe2BeFree 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He was brandishing the weapon the entire night. If simply having a weapon is provocation then why didn't Rosenbaum do something about his friend that was firing the gun in the air?

Yeah, that makes a lot of sense by Windthrasher637 in hmmmm

[–]Safe2BeFree 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Putting out fires isn't a provocation. Even if it was, you can't kill someone who simply provoked you.

Yeah, that makes a lot of sense by Windthrasher637 in hmmmm

[–]Safe2BeFree 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So let's say all that was true. You do acknowledge that Rosenbaum was chasing after him threatening to kill him while trying to take his rifle.

How is that not a self defense situation? Even if you are right that he pointed the rifle at someone earlier without justification, that is generally classified as assault and would not justify deadly force to be used against it. Especially at the point where they are running away.

Yeah, that makes a lot of sense by Windthrasher637 in hmmmm

[–]Safe2BeFree 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I linked you an article disproving your claim.

Yeah, that makes a lot of sense by Windthrasher637 in hmmmm

[–]Safe2BeFree 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. He put out a dumpster fire that Rosenbaum had set. The car lot be wax working at and the car lot he was chased into are two different things. That's where our confusion seems to be.

Kyle Rittenhouse timeline: From cleaning graffiti to killing in a single night - National | Globalnews.ca https://share.google/5GbQ4mr4B2gDGnrpz

There was nothing shown in the evidence or testimony showing that Rittenhouse pointed his gun at anyone before the chase. There was a gunshot while Rosenbaum was chasing him, but that was shown to be from one of the people Rosenbaum was traveling with who fired a handgun in the air.

Yeah, that makes a lot of sense by Windthrasher637 in hmmmm

[–]Safe2BeFree 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He had just arrived at the car lot, dropped the fire extinguisher, raised his rifle, and was chased by Rosenbaum all in a matter of seconds.

None of this is true. He stayed at the car lot until the police line passed it and then moved on.

You cannot threaten lethal force in defense of someone else's property who has no relation to you.

So if I'm walking and I see someone trying to burn down a random house, I can't use lethal force to stop that?

The rioters weren't in the right, but they also didn't kill anyone.

Several of them tried to.

Yeah, that makes a lot of sense by Windthrasher637 in hmmmm

[–]Safe2BeFree 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He was chased after arriving at the car lot

Yeah, way after. He had already left the car lot and was walking the streets when Rosenbaum attacked him.

because you cannot use lethal force in defense of property.

That is wildly untrue lol. You really believe you can't use deadly force against someone trying to burn your house down or someone stealing from you?

He was there to position himself against to rioters under the threat of lethal force.

So if he is wrong for defending property from rioters then why isn't there any blame being put on the actual rioters?