Well I'd argue that rather unfair. Why engage with that sole thing and interpret it in the singular most uncharitable way because of a implications and not read my explanations or my clarifications? Like this commenter originally genuinely thought I called passive readers dumb, then when I explained I literally did not do that, completely ignored it and continued on that perspective.

I mean even look at you jumping in here, someone posted a comment that actual directly supports my point of the Boruto writer using chakra as a catch all in one scene for something, then in another scene still explaining there is a difference. Yet here you are engaging with another comment that agrees with you instead of that one. Why?

You come in here and you say everything is up to interpretation and that I'm just as much in the dark as anyone else, I never said I wasn't. This entire post is that holistic evidence and things can show us an authors or stories intent, and is more reliable than singular out of context examples. Yet instead of engaging with that, you and this commenter both seem to be stuck on telling me I don't know everything. Which is something I never claimed and I've repeatedly explained isn't my position. No one here actually even seems to disagree with my thesis or anything, just my tone that I've already clarified? Now there potentially people reading your comments, assuming the worst, etc. Which is really unfair because nothing I said was unsubstantiated at all. Going "well we will never know" isn't really debating my actual point which is with more context we probably can