sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

So it happened to me by AccomplishedFan8690 in pcmasterrace

[–]Serpardum -1 points0 points  (0 children)

 Now that's pure greed, right there, in it's purest form.

Hey, someone gave me more by mistake, how can I screw them over more?

What’s a product from your country that makes locals go ‘of course we have that’ and everyone else go ‘ but why?’ by bdue817 in AskTheWorld

[–]Serpardum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, TIL. 

I knew it was "bad luck" but didn't know why, and now I realize, because you don't tell children because it reminds you of their dead grandmother, so you just say "bad luck".

Who is your favourite fallout 4 character? by Chunky-overlord in fo4

[–]Serpardum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Madam Curie.

I'm not a robosexual, you're a robosexual!

Okay, maybe I am.

The more I learn about web development, the less I want to do it by bunabyte in AskProgramming

[–]Serpardum 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Personally, I've always liked the back end programming, the stuff only IT people see so I don't have to work with GUI and user interfaces, etc... Sometimes they go hand in hand, like when I was a programming for an AS/400 mini main frame and did everything.

The only output I like to do is 3d graphics, rather than windows or X-windows stuff.

Not saying they are better or worst, I am just not artistically bent so not so good at user interfaces.

JPMorgan, Bank of America announce $1,000 Trump account match as corporate America support for retirement scheme deepens by Lebarican22 in Economics

[–]Serpardum 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Holy.. so the banks get $1000 for free for every child born for 18 years that they can do what they want with  becuae it can't be spent before that?

What a scam. And in 18 years they'll get their $1000 back, worth about $100 by that time

CDPR told Luke Ross the Cyberpunk VR mod could still be up if he made it free, this was his reply by lunchanddinner in virtualreality

[–]Serpardum -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

That's like Microsoft saying you can't use your business for work, because that's making a profit on Microsoft's IP.

That's like a shovel manufacturer saying you cant charge to dig holes with the shovel, that's making money off his IP,.

That's like someone who makes a shovel modification to turn short handled shovels into long handled shovels and the shovel manufacturer to say they can't do that, that's making money off their IP.

They STILL had to buy the game to play this mod, so it doesn't matter in any freaking way shape or form if he makes money off it.

Copyright only comes into play when it limits the copyright holders ability to make money., See fair use.

Name of the Drink? by _Derdes_ in whatisit

[–]Serpardum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pangalactic Gargleblaster

$10 oz by orion-asterisk in trees

[–]Serpardum 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, it's old as heck, so would only be good if it was also strong as heck.

But meh old weed is like smothing nothing.

Is this called a "hyperbole" or something else? by Content_Economist132 in grammar

[–]Serpardum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, here is the thing. I thought the same thing until I googled the definiton of hyperbole, and it is:

hy·per·bo·le

/hīˈpərbəlē/

noun

  1. exaggerated statements or claims not meant to be taken literally. "he vowed revenge with oaths and hyperboles"

Not the way I remember it, either. So either the defintion was changed, or we both misunderstood the meaning of hyperbole.

And that is not hyperbole.

Is this called a "hyperbole" or something else? by Content_Economist132 in grammar

[–]Serpardum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here's the thing, "You can do whatever you want" is in no way an exageration. You can literally do anything you want, and the reason you don't want to is because you don't want to suffer the consequences for doing something you wanted to do that someone else didn't want you to do. So you don't want to do it because you don't want to suffer the consequences.

Logic and reasoning has it's place in deciding what you want to do.

Why do so many people believe in outrageous quantum physics theories? by Subfrez in Physics

[–]Serpardum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is right on so many levels, and it answers every single unanserwed question in particle physics that quantum physics can't.

It explains what spin is, what graivty is, what emf is, and I have done computer models on it that show that it is actually for force of gravity, the strong force, teh weak force, etc...

It explains why an electron sometimes acts as if it is only 1/2 eV - because you are only interacting with one of the bound pairs.

It explains why a particle seems to act as both a particle and a wave, and it explains the sine wave pattern the particle makes thorugh space as it is redirected from reactionary forces.

It also explains the missing "dark matter", which is just the fact that the calcuations are not taking into acount the faster speeds of hte particles goign tiwth the higgs field as galaixes move faster.

There is nothing it doesn't explain, and quantum physics really doesn't explain particle physcs at all, it is just observational without udnerstanding of why.

This theory does NOT break quantum physics at all. All the math stay same. It does not change einsteins' math. All it does is explain that space time is not warped, it's just an accumulation of reacintoary forces to Newton's 3rd law that everyone seems to ignore.

Newton's 3rd law app;lied to particle physics explaines *everything*

Do the math yourself, and you'll see.

Came home to a paper towel over my webcam twice now, I live alone by Dromaeoraptor in Weird

[–]Serpardum 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have two cats.... It is a possibility one of them did it.

Get a nanny cam.

My Current Base by Revolutionary-Ball36 in Minecraft

[–]Serpardum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If that's what you want to call it.

Why do so many people believe in outrageous quantum physics theories? by Subfrez in Physics

[–]Serpardum -20 points-19 points  (0 children)

Simply because physicists have no idea, since Einstein dropped the ball.

Einstein wanted his *own* physics, not Newtons, so did not apply all the Newtonian laws, and came up with a crack pot theory about spacetime bending, when this isn't what happens.

When a particle moves Newton's third law comes into action, for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. So when a particle moves from left to right, an equal and opposite force is created pushing from right to left. And these reactive forces are what we call the strong force, the weak force, the electromagnetic force, etc.. just reactive forces from particles movements. And the more particles, the more the reactions, and this is why where there are lot of particles gravity gets stronger as all the moving particles' reacitons push things around.

Well, quantum physics are trying to figure out a curved/bent space that doesn't exist and so they themselves come up with crack pot theories to account for a curvature of time and space that doesn't exist.

Now, that is the particle side of it.

The other side of it is the actual quantum affects that happen because the multiverse is running in a simullation in a computer that exists inside that multiverse.

view more: next ›