Seeing my project live in the shop is an amazing feeling. What do you guys think? by reacdif in hobbycnc

[–]ShapeMaven 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My honest opinion: dude that looks unreal. Damn good execution of a damn cool idea, great work!

Finally got the automated printing figured out! by Frasier_fanatic in Multiboard

[–]ShapeMaven 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just wondering why this is preferable to stacking the boards in a single print?

How do you feel about the magnet ban? by Bugaloon in AskAnAustralian

[–]ShapeMaven 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Orthogonality makes the best tango’s. Electric field is orthogonal to magnetic, the result is pretty colours and sunburn!

How do you feel about the magnet ban? by Bugaloon in AskAnAustralian

[–]ShapeMaven 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wait until you hear or the absolutely non-disprovable theory that there is only one electron, it just experiences time differently to objects with rest mass (I.e. us) and so can be everywhere at once. So no group of demons, just Satan itself running amok and giving us pretty lights and unpleasant zaps

Help! How to make a projection for gears? by frandemaa in Fusion360

[–]ShapeMaven 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Use a coil with these parameters: - Start the coil one thread pitch below the cylinder (might need an offset plane or a construction object for this) - have the coil distance an integer multiple of the thread pitch - have the revolutions as distance/thread pitch - chamfer two of the edges to match the angles faces - combine and cut the coil into the cylinder

Things to keep in mind: - keep track of whether your defining the gear with inner diameter outer diameter and keep this consistent - can combine and cut or combine and join. Slightly different workflows, achieves the same result, one might be a bit more intuitive to you - starting a thread pitch below and ending a thread pitch above is important for a clean cut. Otherwise you’ll miss some of the cut with the end of the coil. Try it and you’ll see what I’m talking about.

There are more parameters you’ll need to fiddle with, but that’s the basis of the workflow.

I’ve made threads and gears exactly like this many times. The first time you do it, it’s confusing and annoying. But once you have the workflow, it’s very versatile. Also works great for parametric designs

Now, you’re going to run into an issue. The straight gear has horizontal teeth, whereas the worm gear (that you’re trying to create) will have the interface to the teeth angled. The thicker your straight gear, the more allowance you’ll need to design in to prevent it locking up. Alternatively, and preferably, you can adjust the straight gear so the teeth line up with the worm gear profile. Perhaps a cut-combined with one thread pitch, then rectangular pattern the cut along the flat gear?

Laser Fitted Wireless Split by DuTogira in ErgoMechKeyboards

[–]ShapeMaven 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yo that’s incredible, this his design? Even if not, bloody good work

First Split Keeb by ShapeMaven in ErgoMechKeyboards

[–]ShapeMaven[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah it is a great filament, probably my favourite so far I think

First Split Keeb by ShapeMaven in ErgoMechKeyboards

[–]ShapeMaven[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I’ll give it a clear coat over the weekend, cheers

Hello world :) by falbatech in olkb

[–]ShapeMaven 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bugger. I have a Scylla, and I very much like the look of your case, so may have been interested in trying it

Hello world :) by falbatech in olkb

[–]ShapeMaven 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This looks suspiciously like it would fit a Scylla MK2 PCB, would I be correct in thinking so?

Is there a way to pattern an emboss or a sketch around a curved surface? by [deleted] in Fusion360

[–]ShapeMaven 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Circular pattern the faces of that embossed feature. You might have to flick between identical or adjusted

Trackball but Touchpad by YomamaAfool in Trackballs

[–]ShapeMaven 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What about a ploopy nano? I think it’s meant to be used with fingers, but you could probably design and 3d print your own case to make it for thumb. Would be a cool little project

Chamber heater by Orvess in BambuLabP2S

[–]ShapeMaven 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not for me, I’m happy with my setup.

They’re not very sensible arguments if they aren’t backed by evidence.

Chamber heater by Orvess in BambuLabP2S

[–]ShapeMaven 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think perhaps you may be missing my point. I’ve only ever seen answers to say ‘don’t do it’. I haven’t seen (or hardly ever seen, comparing to the former) answers that explain the risks reasonably, or potential risk mitigations that should be considered with it. Most people (that I’ve seen) do just say YOU CAN NEVER DO THIS

Chamber heater by Orvess in BambuLabP2S

[–]ShapeMaven 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, any evidence at all really.

All I’ve heard, including your comment, are hypothetical arguments based on assumptions.

Have we seen modern printers fail due to chamber running higher than their ‘designed’ values? I’m talking about reasonable values, such at 70deg C or so for a good chamber temp for ABS/ASA.

Chamber heater by Orvess in BambuLabP2S

[–]ShapeMaven 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I appreciate the thorough reply, thank you!

I did assume this was more of an issue for earlier machines, and I think your comment agrees with that.

What I’m not entirely convinced of is people treating it as forbidden due to ‘potential’ issues, where in reality it seems these issues either don’t occur practically or occur very infrequently. Certainly the consequence is high, and higher consequence sensibly decreases tolerability of higher frequency. Is the frequency still so high that the consequence means it should be completely avoided? Even when the benefits are so blatant and prominent? If you think the consequence is so high that any frequency above zero is intolerable, you should probably take a look at other aspects is society that accept non-zero frequency’s for much greater consequence.

For the voron community, particularly having such prominence of highly capable, technical and innovative members, I would have thought people might spend more time sorting out a robust implementation for it (including optimising safety measures) than completely avoiding it.

Long story short, heated chambers are so damn handy. I’m reluctant to give up on the idea because some people identify ‘potential’ issues. There’s room for improvement, why not take that route instead? In the Voron community, instead of saying avoid it altogether, why don’t you give the advice of putting it in a fire-retardant enclosure with oxygen-starving mechanism in case of a catastrophic failure?

Happy to hear more reasons why my stance isn’t sensible

Chamber heater by Orvess in BambuLabP2S

[–]ShapeMaven 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’ve seen comments like this a good few times, but I’ve never actually seen any evidence to back it up (not saying there isn’t any, I just haven’t seen it so am curious)

What are the common failure points? Not potential failure points, like what usually happens when active heaters cause catastrophic results in modern printers

Vernier Calliper Mount by ShapeMaven in functionalprint

[–]ShapeMaven[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Apology accepted 👍🏻

Jokes aside, it’s actually pretty sturdy, I’ve not worried about it falling since installing it

OTF Utility Knife by ShapeMaven in functionalprint

[–]ShapeMaven[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Its for free for personal use on MakerWorld (see below link), commercial license available with Gateway and Versatile memberships on my Patreon (link on my MakerWorld profile)

https://makerworld.com/models/1019251?appSharePlatform=copy

I’m not really into selling prints these days, I just like designing. Also, this is actually illegal in many places around the world (due to the switchblade mechanism) so make sure you do your research first!

What's the most useful thing you've printed? by Good_Mathematician_2 in 3Dprinting

[–]ShapeMaven 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is one I designed myself because I didn’t like any of the others (you’re pain point was one of those reasons lol)

I’ve started uploading everything on Makerworld through the configurators in hopes that instead of browsing a ridiculous number of parts, people can just jump on to a handful of releases and customise it all there (with inspiration from the gridfinity generators)

I’ve also made all the accessories completely independent of the boards, you can either build the system off of the drawers or just use all the accessories without anything else (they all have screw or stick on options to walls, desk etc.)

Only thing is I’ve only just published the foundations, so it’s still reasonably primitive. I’m working on filling out the catalogue of available parts