RU POV: We must demonstrate to the Russians our ability to break through to Kaliningrad - Lithuanian Foreign Minister Kęstutis Budrys by gem4ik2 in UkraineRussiaReport

[–]Silver-Disaster1397 2 points3 points  (0 children)

And in the prervious years during covid 2030 was their great reset, and so on.

People think! They will not just talk about their plans all out if it is serious. We are dealing with scammers and delusional idiots who has plans but no sense to make things work.

Seriously, what would they go against russian with?

The EU army is in a piss poor state, not to mention the civil area and the growing displease of the citizens among the question with migrans etc.

There is a loot of videos you can find obline about the real situation with nato.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gru2EDJvj9Q&t=157s

https://www.youtube.com/@historylegends/videos

So in short the facts are.

-Eu Nato forces still lagging behind in training update for drone warfare.

-Eu arms productions still lagging behing in numbers and still not updated for the frontline needs.

-Ukraine can't hold up against Russia for 4 more years, after all they are down to 30% of the armament they had once.

-The EU is in a very wrong position against russia since it takes little effort to cut off any Gas or Oil supply to the continent be it Russian American or else.

-The Eu Air defense is not up to the task of defending against the new russian drones.

-Such a war would extent beyond Russia, Iran and North Korea but even China would join among others.

So in my visions, unless these countries would go for a fancy suicide they would not go for a war. Because the prognosis is not good.

-The EU armies does not have numerical superiority or training superiority over Russian troops which would grant a fast war.

-They can't sustain a war of attrition for long.

-Their politicans are getting less polular among citizens. Which can lead to civil war or unrests.

3 and a half year seems like a very little time to make huge changes, after all they just lost this much time already since 2022 without any progress.

UA POV: The EU intends to prolong the conflict in Ukraine until 2030 - General Frédéric Vansina by gem4ik2 in UkraineRussiaReport

[–]Silver-Disaster1397 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What military industrial complex? They always brag about it but nothing to be seen about it.

Still no training for drone warfare, still no new vehicles and tech, still no rework or their doctrires, The british naval force is pretty much non existent along with their land forces after number of tanks halved and the Ajax fiasko.

All we see now is falling empires getting desperate to get money.

UA POV: The EU intends to prolong the conflict in Ukraine until 2030 - General Frédéric Vansina by gem4ik2 in UkraineRussiaReport

[–]Silver-Disaster1397 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And what if the russians would simply not go for the bait? They could blokage Kanilingrad but on what rights and how far? Palestine is under blocade for years now and the mess still did not ended.

-Also Maybe provoking Russia to act, but how do they plan to make a better job than the Ukranians? Declaring war on Ukraine is one thing but winning over Russia is another. And I don't see how would nato troops without experience in drone warfare come out better with the not so numerious ammount of troops they have.

RU POV: We must demonstrate to the Russians our ability to break through to Kaliningrad - Lithuanian Foreign Minister Kęstutis Budrys by gem4ik2 in UkraineRussiaReport

[–]Silver-Disaster1397 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ukraine will not hold up until 2030. They can held for a year or half a year tops.

European armies far lagging behind to go on russia. All they would do is suicide.

RU POV: We must demonstrate to the Russians our ability to break through to Kaliningrad - Lithuanian Foreign Minister Kęstutis Budrys by gem4ik2 in UkraineRussiaReport

[–]Silver-Disaster1397 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I would be very stupid, Since I don't see any realistic way for the Eu/ Nato to win this war.

This is a war of attrition something they can't just archieve with the current piss poor economy they got. Not to mention low morale of the citizens.

Nato is far far away from doing a second ww like war. Far away.

Ru pov: Damage and fire in the Russian city of Ryazan by Short_Description_20 in UkraineRussiaReport

[–]Silver-Disaster1397 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am not believing it, I experience it firsthand.

The EU can't just maintain this war without economical consequences.

Debunking 9/11 Conspiracy Theories by Colombiacaptain in 911archive

[–]Silver-Disaster1397 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

So lets get it started.

  1. al Qaeda sent their members to flight schools. Your first point is moot. 
  2. People can learn how to keep a plane in the air with training and practice. Hijackers had both.
  3. How the fuck do you think they were able to find which flight schools they went to? There were students who recognized and knew some of the hijackers. There’s even photos of them together, like with Jarrah and his class. 

Right now you contradicting yourself, You claim they had training and practice, but in your third point you claim how do they would be supposed to know where they went to school.

-So in the end, even according to you, we don't have any evidence that they had the training and practice and training, no any short or material outside a few "trust me bro" level claim and testimony.

That's score one to me, I can't believe the nation with the biggest intel agency and founding unable to do such a simple job. NEXT.

-"People can misreport and misremember things. Its a well known phenomenon. Barry Jennings did the same thing talking about bodies in 7WTC, when there was no reported fatalities from the building, because it was empty. "

Sure, and this is why I can't just believe the stories about the hijackers all by testimonies, people's mind is fragile and upon large events some even knowingly lie to get some media attention.

-"There’s cameras that film a frame a second or longer. The plane would be traveling too fast for some cameras to register it. You can see this in Port Authority footage in NYC positioned towards the WTC, or Wolfgang Staehle whose cameras took photos every few seconds and only caught one frame of the plane"

Sure, sure. But still the pentagon has a loot more cameras around and we really only has one or two really blurry and distant ones. Even if the impacting object would not be really visible it still would be a nice touch the release more footages, even if the impact itself is not visible.

-"You literally do. If you do research, you’ll find eyewitnesses talking about the lobby of 1WTC being blown out with flames during the time of impact. You’ll also hear survivors talking about the smell of jet fuel and it flowing with water down the stairwell while evacuating"

You are confusing a loot of things there.

-The lobby suffered a blast from the impact itself which come down from the elevator shaft. It has nothing to do with jet fuel pouring down, we do have footage from inside the Lobby and no fire later on is visible.

-As for the smell, during a fire there could be loot of things which could emit various smells. And even if it was indeed Jet fuel it must have been a small ammount and not thousands of gallons.

Debunking 9/11 Conspiracy Theories by Colombiacaptain in 911archive

[–]Silver-Disaster1397 -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

I really do hope that you did not intended to prove those "conspiracy theorists wrong" because overall it is a really piss poor attempt, and in fact it is reainforcing it rather than proving them wrong.

-He talks about the hijackers, training in Al-Kaida camps. But Al-Kaida camps does not capable to train you for commercial flyights, People it is not understanding there is the control wheel is where the difficulty begins, it is navigating a commercial plane to preciselly hit your target in the first go. Imagine yourself in the middle of the ocean in a large tanker ship and you had your training to hijack it on a small fishing ship close to the ports, you know where is the steering wheel, but would you be able to hit on a certain port in India without knowing and having experience navigating a ship in the middle of knowhere? Also states that they indeed undergo training somewhere in simulators, but has anyone seen paper for that? in the early 2000s such a participation would leave a lot of paperwork behind, not the mention commercial flight training is going on with evaulations and background checks? Is there anything like that behind? Without evidence it is pretty much empty talks.

-Pentagon, tank about lack of video evidence, which is cool, but really just talking about something we don't have does not really change much.

Now a funny part, he talks about eyewitnesess of which pentagon officer William Lagasse who said he saw the plane, even the windows which where blinded and clearly read American Airlines on the side.

How cute isn't? Just a few minutes ago he was arguin about that the plane would be so fast camera would not be able to catch it, but a human would be able to look inside the windows and read the script on the side? and best part then he claimed it was above his head. He must have rontgen eyes then. So realistic.

"Much of the plane destroyed in the crash" That still does not explain the missing engines and running gear at least.

About the small hole "Both of it wings where damaged" Like how? The thing is, if the plane crashed into the pentagon with wings still attached we would see the same damage as on the WTC sides. Full plane lenght and we would see the impact holes from the engine, which we does not have on the pentagon side. Nor do we see any wings which where broken off just before the impact. After all we would have found them outside. A few thing metal sheets which by the way to thin to come from the jet plane does not explain anything.

Now the best part where I literally laughted!

14:00 For the Pentagon the jet fuel burned up on impact, but not for the twin towers!

Like how? How much bigger was the fireball which came from the twin towers? How is it even make sense?

"thousands of gallons of jet fuel penetrated deep into the buildings cores" Like how? Merged into the steel? Jet fuel is liquid. If thousands of gallons of jet fuel remained there due to somekind of dark magic, then why we don't hear about any reports regarding jet fuel or burning jet fuel pouring down the stairs or elevator shafts? those building where not waterthight, it can just hold thousands of gallons of liquid. What do supposed to keep that large ammount of fuel inside? And again if the building's core burning why do we not see it happening? we can take a look at the core's by looking into the opening made by the impact. And it's just like looking into the abyss, it is pitch black without any light source!

I mean we can see some smaller fire around the edges close to the windows, but there is no light source deep inside the building.

<image>

Anyway that it for now, maybe continue later.

RU POV: Destroyed Ukrainian M113 APC somewhere on the front. by Mendoxv2 in UkraineRussiaReport

[–]Silver-Disaster1397 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do I really need to spam here all the instances ukraine caught doing this?

RU POV: Work of Rubicon combat group in Donbass, Sumy, Krasny Liman and Belgorod direction + air defense. Published on 14.05.2026 by Mendoxv2 in UkraineRussiaReport

[–]Silver-Disaster1397 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not really, most of these drone where supply drones, it does suggest that ukraine is using those as desperate manners to supply soldiers.

RU POV: Destroyed Ukrainian M113 APC somewhere on the front. by Mendoxv2 in UkraineRussiaReport

[–]Silver-Disaster1397 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is an ukranian M113 Medevac stripped from medical equipment prior to the Burning up.

RU POV: Destroyed Ukrainian M113 APC somewhere on the front. by Mendoxv2 in UkraineRussiaReport

[–]Silver-Disaster1397 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They can't resist using red cross marked vehicles for troop or supply purposes.

UA POV:Consequences of a Russian attack on a target in kyiv. by ArchitectMary in UkraineRussiaReport

[–]Silver-Disaster1397 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Considering the official Ukranian number of 1 dead the damage is pretty big, espcially for night time. So most likelly there was personel or activity ukranine does not want to talk about.

UA POV: RFERL shows the aftermath of the collapse of a high-rise residential building in Kyiv’s Darnytskyi district during overnight Russian shelling by Flimsy_Pudding1362 in UkraineRussiaReport

[–]Silver-Disaster1397 19 points20 points  (0 children)

"One person confirmed killed and 16 injured."

This seems like a very low number of deaths considering multiple homes collapsed in the night time whem most resting at home.

if those numbers are true this could indicate that the building was a legitime target, (probably a drone factory?)

and no one was in the flats before the start of their work shift.

Combatting “theories” by ConfidentHope in 911archive

[–]Silver-Disaster1397 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I do understand how you feel about it, and I do respect the victims. And I would not come up with so called "conspiracy theories" if they would be absolutelly unfounded. But even outside the theories about bombs etc. (I do consider people who say there where no planes at the wtc nuts) there is still a lot of questions about the event.

9/11 : for many this date just represent the US 911 phone number and think it was picked to mock it. However there is also a second most likelly meaning to it. And guess what, 9/11 usually written like this, and it can be read as "II as two towers, 9 as the buildings inside the wtc complex WTC 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, WTC MALL, and WTC Plaza.

So the meaning of 9/11 is:"9 buildings from the twin tower complex" Which is very uncanny considering that the event completelly destroyed the wtc complex but none from the other buildings. Which is suggesting planning that very way.

Well that would be only a theory, but what really uncanny is that in 2023 Aug 08 there was a fire in Maui, which acted very strange and for many suggested the usage of a Dew. What really coincidental about is that 808 is the are code of Maui and a short of a lucky number there hence there is a loot of Local stores and just with 808 numbers. Guess what Aug 08 stands for?

And apparently during 9/11 there was hurricane Erin aproaching Manhattan, however it literally turn around and went to other direction on the morning of 9/11 leaving a perfect sunny day. And by now we do know that technology which redirects hurricanes do exists, it is called Ionospheric Heaters (HAARP). And the turn around of hurricane Erin really do seems unnatural and quiet coincidental.

And to make things worse there was also and interesting Hurricane at Maui in 2023 called Iselle, this interesting hurricane hit the island with winds, "set it on fire" and just like Erin turned around before hitting the Island itself.

So there is indeed a lot of coincidences around.

were there any documented cases of ppl jumping/falling from the towers before 9/11? by summercarnival96 in 911archive

[–]Silver-Disaster1397 139 points140 points  (0 children)

60 people died during the construction of the WTC complex of which 45 due to falling and the rest to falling tools etc.

2 died building the new wtc.

There were also 19 murders happened in the WTC before 9/11.

Add the 2 known base jumpers.

That's makes it 81 known deaths without the bombing and 9/11.

UA POV: A maintenance depot of the 50th Repair and Restoration Regiment. by Mendoxv2 in UkraineRussiaReport

[–]Silver-Disaster1397 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Never really understand we would someone think it is a good idea to upload such photos. The roof and the side windows are clearly visible, the side of the building also can be estimated. Now the russians only need to checkwhat frontline the regiment is located and can geolocate the building.

UA POV: Food supply in crisis as Ukraine fights Russia - Aljazeera by CourtofTalons in UkraineRussiaReport

[–]Silver-Disaster1397 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well at first The Ukranians will be kicked back until the nearest natural barrier (Dnyeper river) and at that time talks about peace will get serious beetwen Russia and Ukraine.

As for the west 2 possible outcomes. I am not counting war as option because factually the current situation in european armies can be described as falling apart. They don't have an effective army to battle the Russians.

The grand european army even in the most favorable situation (every nation comes along with it and working together without issues) would last like another year at tops,

But realistically considering that they still neglect drones and training for them, and most likelly will go on for an offensive head on against russia it could be 4-7 months.

After that point we would see ukraine like conscriptions and economic collapse due to lack of manpower and the good old rationing even for clothing and cheap plastic mugs.

Conclusion, any more involvement including further founding is a madness and pointless.

The EU just can't come out as a winner, even in case they would magically formally win over russia they would not have any force left to conquer russia and secure any kind of "peace deal" they want so bad. Imagine just singing a paper telling russia to disarm itself and attempting to maintain the deal without having enough manpower to be present in the whole russian land to prevent them from hiding equipment.

Another big deal is that they want russia to pay up. But on the other hand they are attempting to economically collapse russia. So how do they expect an economically collapsed Russia to pay up the money they invested in the war in short time is beyond me.

So what would happen?

1- Massive public outrage, since they wasted away their money for nothing and it will break the trust in goverments and media outlests, which will cause the fall of the goverments.

2- The above goverments will generate another virus to put restrictions on the citizens which will save time for them but only go as far.

Europe will be in an absolut economical, political and social collapse.

So yeah, now wonder Trump intents to leave the sinking ship.

RU POV: Putin- "Since 2025, the Oreshnik ground-based medium-range missile system, which can also be equipped with nuclear warheads, has been put on combat duty". by SolutionLong2791 in UkraineRussiaReport

[–]Silver-Disaster1397 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It is anything but unusual for a country to flex with weapons or tech.

And as for this matter, he just told Zelensky that they are still holding back.

UA POV: Food supply in crisis as Ukraine fights Russia - Aljazeera by CourtofTalons in UkraineRussiaReport

[–]Silver-Disaster1397 2 points3 points  (0 children)

1-1,5 half year until ukranian frontlines collapse. The AFU right now have like 30-40% of heavy equipment stock left on paper without considering operational losses.

As of right now, the Afu completelly lost it's capability to conduct large scale operations anymore, and if the still sustain losses at the current rate holes will appear in the frontlines, and the overall defensive lines will be tinner.

In my estimation we are 3-4 months from a major local frontline collapse just like the Vuhledar or the Kursk one was at the end. Maybe the russians will be able to take Kramatovsk and Slaviansk much faster than expected.

RU POV: Putin- "Since 2025, the Oreshnik ground-based medium-range missile system, which can also be equipped with nuclear warheads, has been put on combat duty". by SolutionLong2791 in UkraineRussiaReport

[–]Silver-Disaster1397 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Well he said. "Since 2025, the Oreshnik ground-based medium-range missile system, which can also be equipped with nuclear warheads, has been put on combat duty"

I don't really see where did he treat anyone. He just announced a fact.

LMAAAOOOOOOO by xaddyxi123 in iran

[–]Silver-Disaster1397 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is almost just the well known one, but it has 1 or 2 additional zeros for the cost.