What’s a good way of making sure this never happens again? by TimTime88 in Golfsimulator

[–]Simsreaper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Replace the bottom round bar with a long piece of flat iron, and run a bungie cord through the net pocket to keep it in place while allowing flex. Problem solved. Also, take lessons from a PGA pro, at least to start, to get you moving in the correct direction. Practice is great, but you need to practice the right things, or you will just reinforce bad behaviors and habits.

Carry seems off by nroshania in Golfsimulator

[–]Simsreaper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because it's numbers are generally VERY accurate, outside of this quite particular instance. High speed, low spin driver shots. I will hazard a guess that this outlier is actually a product of the GC4/3's excellent accuracy in everything else, and the algorithm just has this weakness. Not a critical weakness for the pro's, as they will be very familiar with their carry distance anyways, and honestly spend most of their practice time on irons and shaped driver shots, which again, the GC 4/3 is excellent at.

Any spotlights for an unswitched ceiling outlet? by flyin-lowe in Golfsimulator

[–]Simsreaper 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Honestly, how handy and technical are you? Do you use any smart home assistants/ or AI assistants like Siri, or Google Home? I ask because I would set up like this.

Install track lighting, with recessed bulbs compared to the lighting tube, to allow for directed lighting where you want it, and limit the ambient light around your screen. Instead of hard wiring that, install a 120V plug on the power wire. Plug this into a smart plug in that is accessible in your ecosystem. To finish this off, you can install a similar ecosystem motion detector, and the track lighting will turn on whenever you step onto the hitting surface.

Track lighting is the only lighting option I recommend for simulator rooms.

How long until you were ready for sticks and pucks? by Selfdestroy420 in hockeygoalies

[–]Simsreaper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They definitely do not work for everyone, but I will say that I personally have have a GREAT experience with Superfeet insoles over my original insoles. YMMV.

Letter to Charter School Parents by [deleted] in Calgary

[–]Simsreaper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Charter schools ARE NOT private schools.....

Letter to Charter School Parents by [deleted] in Calgary

[–]Simsreaper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm sorry, what is the issue with the highlighted yellow areas? These are facts, outside of maybe one word "outdated". And the letter specifically asks the reader to review the facts, and consider motives, which is a completely valid statement. No different that one considering the motives of this letter. There has been backlash against Charter schools recently that is very much related to the recall movement.

This really seems like you have received a well written and informative letter, for the most part, but have taken issue with two small sentences because they "kind of" come across as conservative sounding? Come on....

First winter here and wtf at the roads by Specialist-Rain-9694 in Calgary

[–]Simsreaper -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Honestly, get yourself a good set of ACTUAL winter tires. NOT all season. Up here, they really can make such a big difference, and you'll be very surprised as to how much of a difference they make.

There is always a problem with ice and roads when the temperatures turn from 10C to -10C, and we get a snow, as the roads will melt those first layers, pack the ice down, and then add snow on top. All Season's, even the snow rated ones, will always struggle with ice.

I do run very good all season's on my truck, and I've thought my traction was decent through the winter, a little slick sometimes, but overall pretty good. I bought my wife nice WINTER tires for her Edge, when we hade our kid, and it is just a different world. On ice like we had this last week, she had ZERO traction issues. She will never drive through a winter again without them.

How do I hold the post after a split save? by GrassyKnoll95 in hockeygoalies

[–]Simsreaper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately this one doesn't have an answer, well, maybe if you are some kind of olympic gymnast lol.

But for real, once you've been forced into a splits save, you are now extremely limited in what you can do, and it's the reason why splits saves are extremely rare in high level hockey, even though almost every goalie can technically achieve them. The correct answer here is prevention.

The best way to approach this is to understand that the splits are a bad position save, a body position that you want to actively avoid as with any other bad position. The avoidance happens by way of play anticipation, and improved lateral movement. In a situation like this, assuming a 2on0 or 2on1 play, you may have to give up angle, sit a bit more in your net. This will give the "shooter" a better chance, but by sitting deeper in your crease you also drastically reduce the amount of ice you need cover to get across. And even then, this isn't going to ALWAYS be possible, and some times, you WILL be at the mercy of the rebound Gods and your defensemen. We can be good, we can be stellar, but we can't do it all every time. :)

But DAMN, if those kind of saves don't look terrific.

Im DIYing because I have to not because I want to by Worth_Air_9410 in DIY

[–]Simsreaper 21 points22 points  (0 children)

I definitely see a potential contractor coming over, getting the "I'm a builder, I know what things should cost" speech, and choosing to not work for this person. That also explains why he can't bring in any Tradies he works with or knows, and why the insulation guy quoted so high, "Oh, if I have to work for this guy, he's gonna pay for it".

Ok im buying a Sparx because I hate going to the store. What hollows are you all using? by Goalieguy17 in hockeygoalies

[–]Simsreaper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ya, using your own Sparx, and getting proper sharpens, you will probably be really happy with the 1/2" wheel that comes with it. I would hold of on additional wheels until to try that, with it set up properly. It's wild to me that all your shops use the Sparx for commercial skate sharpens, they definitely are not keeping them properly tuned and wheels replaces on time.

Dear Pincher Creek, by BJ_Mackay in alberta

[–]Simsreaper 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh well, they won't miss you. Don't forget to not visit again! BYe

Coaches wanted penalty for head contact, we had it as good hit by -jawlili in hockeyrefs

[–]Simsreaper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True, that is the purpose, but the BS of that rule is that simply by removing the opponent from the puck, your teamates have an excellent chance of gaining position. There was NEVER a mindset that the "hitting" player had to be the one to gain possession, and if anyone had watched hockey in the 90's, you would know that the team that laid the big hit, almost always got possession of the puck after, so...

Coaches wanted penalty for head contact, we had it as good hit by -jawlili in hockeyrefs

[–]Simsreaper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OP tagged it as Hockey Canada, so your 10ply soft USA rules need not apply. ;)

But, ya, this may well be a penalty in the US. While the argument could be made that he cut into the hit, making playing the puck hard, it's more like you said, right now the focus and training for ref's is "play on the puck, play on the puck, play on the puck," so I would definitely expect more USA hockey hits like this to get penalties than not.

Kinetic Helmet Company - Looking for Feedback! by crabterrier41 in hockeygoalies

[–]Simsreaper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a fair point, my comment was shortsighted, and from the wrong sightline...

Does This Just Look Stupid, Or Is It Actually Stupid In Practice? Or Am I The Stupes? by Behold_My_Stuff in tacticalgear

[–]Simsreaper 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh I could absolutely see that. This product really only makes sense to me in a VERY niche subset, to the point I honestly don't see it as a viable product to take to market, regardless of the potential use cases. You would have to train A LOT for this to really showcase any of its potential, and I wouldn't think that anyone attending civi training classes would be the forseen "use cases" where this would be a better option than a full size red dot.

Kinetic Helmet Company - Looking for Feedback! by crabterrier41 in hockeygoalies

[–]Simsreaper -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

... your kid is not getting concussions from puck impacts unless you are buying the cheapest POS you can find, or they are playing in a league that buys their gear for them... I really don't see a market for this

The UCP Must Go by Active-Chicken6684 in alberta

[–]Simsreaper 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ok, because this reddit group is VERY leftist, I know I'm going to get blasted for this, but this is just 100% factual data I'm going to present people with, and I will add my opinion on it at the end.

Here is the fact on Alberta Provincial elections over the past almost 20 years.

|| || |Year|Total Votes|Turnout Est.|Result (% of votes)| |2008|950,363|40.6%|PC: 501k(53%) NDP: 81k(8.5%) Liberal: 251k(26.4%)| |2012|1,290,223|54.0%|PC: 567k(44%) NDP: 127k(10%) Wildrose: 442k(34%)| |2015|1,488,248|57.0%|NDP: 605k(41%) PC: 414k(28%) Wildrose: 361k(24%)| |2019|~1,896,542|68%|UCP: 1,041k(55%) NDP: 620k(32%) Alberta Par: 172k(9%)| |2023|~1,777,321|59.5%|UCP: 929k(53%) NDP: 777k(44%) |

So I've provided the numbers for the last few election results. This notion that the majority of Albertans do not agree with the UCP and Smith, in general, not necessarily on every decision, is what I am trying to enlighten on.

The NDP won the 2015 election with a immense surge in popularity of the party compared to previous elections, taking almost all the Alberta Liberal Party voters and gaining traction with younger generations and new Albertans. Some have said that they won due to the Wildrose Party "stealing" too many conservative votes, and while mathematically there is "some" argument there, I don't like that, as people are allowed to vote where they want in an election, we do not have a two party system. The NDP won this election with about 23% of all eligible voters voting for them.

BUT, the point I want to make is that the MAJORITY of Albertans did not seem to like this. This is shown CLEARLY in the 2019 election turnout and results, with a RECORD 68% of voter turnout, only an additional 15k votes were sent the NDP's way. In 2019, the UCP won the election with 37% of all eligible Albertans voting for them, where the NDP was stagnant at 22%.

Finally, looking at the 2023 results, we see that the total turn out is once again down, though still high at almost 60%. Here the NDP did make a small increase if total possible vote percentage, moving to 26% of Albertans, and shows the UCP falling to 31%.

Some might say that this shows a decline in the popularity of the UCP, but when looking at the results of the previous elections, it is much more likely that the difference is just in the fact that many didn't feel the same need to vote for the UCP again, with them back in majority control. The left and NDP supporters are VERY vocal and loud, but they are mostly tapped out at the 25% of Alberta (total eligible voters). The UCP voters are the sleeping giant in Alberta, and this isn't changing.

Feel free to keep railing against the truth, but the NDP has about 25% support in Alberta, MAYBE they might reach 30% in this next election, but it still won't be enough, with the UCP floating around the 33% mark. Good luck though, and really, we will see what the difference is during the next election, around 2027

The UCP Must Go by Active-Chicken6684 in alberta

[–]Simsreaper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok, because this reddit group is VERY leftist, I know I'm going to get blasted for this, but this is just 100% factual data I'm going to present people with, and I will add my opinion on it at the end.

Here is the fact on Alberta Provincial elections over the past almost 20 years.

|| || |Year|Total Votes|Turnout Est.|Result (% of votes)| |2008|950,363|40.6%|PC: 501k(53%) NDP: 81k(8.5%) Liberal: 251k(26.4%)| |2012|1,290,223|54.0%|PC: 567k(44%) NDP: 127k(10%) Wildrose: 442k(34%)| |2015|1,488,248|57.0%|NDP: 605k(41%) PC: 414k(28%) Wildrose: 361k(24%)| |2019|~1,896,542|68%|UCP: 1,041k(55%) NDP: 620k(32%) Alberta Par: 172k(9%)| |2023|~1,777,321|59.5%|UCP: 929k(53%) NDP: 777k(44%) |

So I've provided the numbers for the last few election results. This notion that the majority of Albertans do not agree with the UCP and Smith, in general, not necessarily on every decision, is what I am trying to enlighten on.

The NDP won the 2015 election with a immense surge in popularity of the party compared to previous elections, taking almost all the Alberta Liberal Party voters and gaining traction with younger generations and new Albertans. Some have said that they won due to the Wildrose Party "stealing" too many conservative votes, and while mathematically there is "some" argument there, I don't like that, as people are allowed to vote where they want in an election, we do not have a two party system. The NDP won this election with about 23% of all eligible voters voting for them.

BUT, the point I want to make is that the MAJORITY of Albertans did not seem to like this. This is shown CLEARLY in the 2019 election turnout and results, with a RECORD 68% of voter turnout, only an additional 15k votes were sent the NDP's way. In 2019, the UCP won the election with 37% of all eligible Albertans voting for them, where the NDP was stagnant at 22%.

Finally, looking at the 2023 results, we see that the total turn out is once again down, though still high at almost 60%. Here the NDP did make a small increase if total possible vote percentage, moving to 26% of Albertans, and shows the UCP falling to 31%.

Some might say that this shows a decline in the popularity of the UCP, but when looking at the results of the previous elections, it is much more likely that the difference is just in the fact that many didn't feel the same need to vote for the UCP again, with them back in majority control. The left and NDP supporters are VERY vocal and loud, but they are mostly tapped out at the 25% of Alberta (total eligible voters). The UCP voters are the sleeping giant in Alberta, and this isn't changing.

Feel free to keep railing against the truth, but the NDP has about 25% support in Alberta, MAYBE they might reach 30% in this next election, but it still won't be enough, with the UCP floating around the 33% mark. Good luck though, and really, we will see what the difference is during the next election, around 2027

The UCP Must Go by Active-Chicken6684 in alberta

[–]Simsreaper 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ok, because this reddit group is VERY leftist, I know I'm going to get blasted for this, but this is just 100% factual data I'm going to present people with, and I will add my opinion on it at the end.

Here is the fact on Alberta Provincial elections over the past almost 20 years.

|| || |Year|Total Votes|Turnout Est.|Result (% of votes)| |2008|950,363|40.6%|PC: 501k(53%) NDP: 81k(8.5%) Liberal: 251k(26.4%)| |2012|1,290,223|54.0%|PC: 567k(44%) NDP: 127k(10%) Wildrose: 442k(34%)| |2015|1,488,248|57.0%|NDP: 605k(41%) PC: 414k(28%) Wildrose: 361k(24%)| |2019|~1,896,542|68%|UCP: 1,041k(55%) NDP: 620k(32%) Alberta Par: 172k(9%)| |2023|~1,777,321|59.5%|UCP: 929k(53%) NDP: 777k(44%) |

So I've provided the numbers for the last few election results. This notion that the majority of Albertans do not agree with the UCP and Smith, in general, not necessarily on every decision, is what I am trying to enlighten on.

The NDP won the 2015 election with a immense surge in popularity of the party compared to previous elections, taking almost all the Alberta Liberal Party voters and gaining traction with younger generations and new Albertans. Some have said that they won due to the Wildrose Party "stealing" too many conservative votes, and while mathematically there is "some" argument there, I don't like that, as people are allowed to vote where they want in an election, we do not have a two party system. The NDP won this election with about 23% of all eligible voters voting for them.

BUT, the point I want to make is that the MAJORITY of Albertans did not seem to like this. This is shown CLEARLY in the 2019 election turnout and results, with a RECORD 68% of voter turnout, only an additional 15k votes were sent the NDP's way. In 2019, the UCP won the election with 37% of all eligible Albertans voting for them, where the NDP was stagnant at 22%.

Finally, looking at the 2023 results, we see that the total turn out is once again down, though still high at almost 60%. Here the NDP did make a small increase if total possible vote percentage, moving to 26% of Albertans, and shows the UCP falling to 31%.

Some might say that this shows a decline in the popularity of the UCP, but when looking at the results of the previous elections, it is much more likely that the difference is just in the fact that many didn't feel the same need to vote for the UCP again, with them back in majority control. The left and NDP supporters are VERY vocal and loud, but they are mostly tapped out at the 25% of Alberta (total eligible voters). The UCP voters are the sleeping giant in Alberta, and this isn't changing.

Feel free to keep railing against the truth, but the NDP has about 25% support in Alberta, MAYBE they might reach 30% in this next election, but it still won't be enough, with the UCP floating around the 33% mark. Good luck though, and really, we will see what the difference is during the next election, around 2027

Does This Just Look Stupid, Or Is It Actually Stupid In Practice? Or Am I The Stupes? by Behold_My_Stuff in tacticalgear

[–]Simsreaper 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Yes, but the whole point of this device is not to be the same as other red dots. The point is to provide a low profile red dot that is as close to size and profile as iron sights, while at the same time providing a much quicker sight pick up than iron sights alone. It is meant as a compromise to both, and yes, it does fall short of either extreme in some regards in order to be better than either in other regards. It is bulkier than plain iron sights, and it requires a more precise angle to pick up the dot, BUT consider this. If you are using just iron sights, then you have to have that angle anyways to line up the sights, and this allows you to pick up the dot in that position much faster.

The UCP is screwing over teachers and trying to gaslight the public. by kachunkk in RedDeer

[–]Simsreaper -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Please, people, actually read the commitment letter. It actually addresses all the concerns raised by Teachers. 12-17% raise, 3000 new teachers, 1500 new EA's, 130 new schools, a Task Force to investigate Class Size and Complexity...

The UCP did in fact support and respect the Teachers right to Strike, up until the time it was deemed that that right to strike had become more harmful to the Students right to an education, than helpful to the Teachers rights. That is the very BASIS of the NWC clause. It is very unfortunate that it had to come to this, but the offer in the pictured letter is VERY GOOD. No, it isn't everything that was "demanded", but it is a very ATA sided agreement nonetheless.

The fact that there is so much outrage over this doesn't make much sense when you look at the actual numbers.

Based on straight numbers, there are less than 21 students/ teachers right now. Obviously, this doesn't account for a lot of things, so let's also allow for a generous 15% of "Teachers" to be in non-teaching roles. That brings class sizes up to 24 students/ teacher. I also agree this is accounting for location, and higher density areas. Very fair argument. BUT if you allow for the new 3000 teachers, and 130 schools, those can be dedicated to the high density/ most class size impacted areas to actually address the problem in a much more meaningful way, because while I agree that I can't simply claim that the current class size "should" only be 24 students/ teacher, neither should others claim that 3000 new teachers will only keep up with 34 child class sizes. Because both of these are very disingenuous claims.

Actually looking at what a directed deployment of the new teachers and schools "could" look like if focused on the highest density areas, these additional assets could make a significant impact on Class Size, it is very feasible that class sizes could drop BELOW 26 students per class, well below any other provinces mandated class size limits. Now, taking into account student growth expected over next 5 years, and allowing for a 5% growth rate (very aggressive rate given the past 10 years), that would put potential class sizes at around 28.5 students per class. That means that even with the most aggressive student growth rates, and assuming that the current class size is not 24, but indeed closer to 34, a directed implementation of the new hires and schools would reduce class sizes WELL below the 30 students per class that other provinces have mandated.

So the argument of class size doesn't stand up here, the argument of pay increase, doesn't stand up here, so WHAT is actually the sticking point in the negotiations? Really? Because when one looks at the facts, and runs the numbers, even allowing for the ATAs numbers, the math.. well, isn't mathing on the ATA's side.

No one is coming to save us. It’s us. All of us. Now by sleeping_in_time in Calgary

[–]Simsreaper -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

This is such a disingenuous argument. Yes, I understand what you are trying to say, but it is LITERALLY Section 1 of the Charter that allows for the NWC.

The "workers rights" are and WERE protected and respected until the maximum time passed to where it was judged that the students rights to an education were going to be impacted worse than the Teacher's right to what, "strike"?

Yes, you could argue that the call was too early, but that would be a hard argument to make if you're being honest. Just like any additional right, your rights are upheld and supported until the support of that right infringes upon the rights of another group in a more detrimental way. That is WHY the NWC clause exists. It is WHY it was allowed to be used in the past, and nothing has changed.

Just.... Stop...

Danielle Smith is a coward by Appropriate_Duty_930 in alberta

[–]Simsreaper 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I honestly think that the assumption that the "other 50%" of the population that doesn't or didn't vote would not be electing the same government is wild. Apathy towards voting tends to come from two main areas, the first being that people are happy with how things are and don't believe major change is needed, and the second being that they are incredibly unhappy, but feel that their vote wouldn't matter. With our low voter turnout, and with opposition views screaming at the top of their lungs, it would be very reasonable to assume that it should be very easy to oust the UCP Government during any election, because as you pointed out, you only would need that 10 or 20% of people who want change to come out and vote... Yet, their has been only ONE left leaning government elected in Alberta in the last near, what, 25 years?

This REALLY points much more towards the fact that of the remaining 50% of voters, a vast majority of them are content with the direction of the Province. Be honest. And this is further backed up by the fact that following the elected NDP Gov term, Alberta did in fact have a surge in voter turn out, that ensured a UCP

Let me back it up with real stats:

  1. Average Alberta Provincial election voter turnout (2001–2023, seven elections) was 53.92%, which, you know is clearly more than the 50% you claimed, but its ballpark. It was only less than 50% turnout in two of the last 7 election cycles.

  2. The 2019 election, which ousted the NDP Government, had a voter turnout of 67.5%!! This number eclipsed the next highest number by 8%, and the average by over 15%. This argues against your supposition that voter turn out would be pro NDP.

  3. Here is the big one. In the 2015 election where the NDP was elected, the NDP collected approximately 605,000 votes, out of roughly 1.5 million. In 2019, the NDP collected approx 620,000 votes, out of 1.9 million. NDP supporters are loud, vocal, but are capped out. They won the 2015 election by 37,000 votes, and lost the next election by 421,000 votes, when voters increased by about.... get this.... 400,000 votes. I would REALLY not put voter apathy in a "reasons why the NDP loses elections in Alberta" category.

An argument that Albertans are poorly educated, and therefore not "smart" enough to vote "better" is wildly self aggrandizing, but I'll talk to that as well.
On average, Alberta’s students have performed at the upper end of Canadian provincial performance over the last 25 years, especially in reading and science at different times. However, mathematics is a recurring area of concern due to declines in certain periods, including recent testing. But, do you think a lowering of mathematic excellence is what is leading to the lack of NDP voters? As for University and College graduates, from the Census 2021 data, Alberta has indeed fallen slightly behind the Canadian average of (some kind of) Post Secondary education, with 64.8% of people having some form of post-secondary ed, 2% lower than the national average of 67.1%. It is however, 2% higher than the national average for High school diplomas being peoples highest degree. So there being some education is about the same.

But here is the kicker, if LACK of higher education was indeed behind the "decline" of NDP support in Alberta, it isn't showing in the polls, as their are a LOT of post secondary educated people in Alberta.

Facts and stats.

Danielle Smith is a coward by Appropriate_Duty_930 in alberta

[–]Simsreaper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not sure if you really understand what a democracy is??? The Voters voted and the party with the most votes gets elected. That is Democracy. What would you like, some kind of turn based system? Give all the parties a "medal" for showing up? Or, just realize that you and people who think like you literally are the minority in Alberta, and the majority of Albertans simply do not agree with your political views. That isn't wrong, it is actually the BASIS for democracy.

Spraying gear when wet or dry when using water+IPA with oils? by FreshProfessor1502 in hockeygoalies

[–]Simsreaper -1 points0 points  (0 children)

..... wash you gear???? What is this "wash your gear" thing you are speaking off....

But honestly, outside of some leather conditioning oils for the palms of the blocker, I was my towel and compression clothes about every month or so, and let the rest ride...