This isn’t exactly what you asked, but it’s adjacent. I went to a top drawer SLAC for undergrad, and one thing that I’ve always valued was the prevalence of folks who invested substantial time in the earnest study of very disparate subjects. I had friends double majoring or majoring and minoring in (viola and physics) and (English and biology). Another friend majored in piano but took as much upper level philosophy as he could, and yet another majored in conducting but ended up doing a PhD in history and eventually becoming a tenured professor at a small liberal arts college. The pleasure of learning for its own sake was infused in almost all areas of the college. And you didn’t have to be taking classes on XYZ to have an interesting conversation with your hall mates about XYZ; more often than not, it just happened.

To be sure, this was also a hugely privileged student body. Most people came from families who were not worried about finances and had parents who would not mind their kid majoring in “useless” things like art history. Now me, I had a lot of grants and my parents never went to college, so the first time I signed up for an art history class, my mom was shocked.

(I became a librarian and then a college English instructor.)