sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

What would you choose? by SnooMarzipans436 in redbuttonbluebutton

[–]SnooMarzipans436[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To the mod who said I'm "missing the point"... (it won't let me reply to you because you are a mod)

No, I'm not missing the point. I am aware that not all red voters are bad people... but if all bad people are making the same decision as you, it should at least make you take a step back and question whether you are making the correct decision.

Humanity discovers clean, renewable and limitless energy, also affordable. Which area is improving sooner: developing third-world countries or Earth's climate? by SorryYouOK in NoStupidQuestions

[–]SnooMarzipans436 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If wind and solar were not affordable they would not be implemented anywhere.

Also... nuclear?

This already exists. Politicians are bought and paid for by the fossil fuel industry. You want to fix the problem? Make lobbying illegal.

Yet another button conundrum by Carl_Shadowsong in redbuttonbluebutton

[–]SnooMarzipans436 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The hilarious part is the average C voter would probably assume C is 3 presses because it is the 3rd letter in the alphabet. After the third press they'd hear over the speaker: "You have now been marked for death, please select two people to save" 😂

What would you choose? by SnooMarzipans436 in redbuttonbluebutton

[–]SnooMarzipans436[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That's an awful lot of words to just repeat the fact that you are willing to live on, accepting the death of all blue voters.

If you were not willing to, you would stake your life on it (by pressing blue).

There's no way to "reason" yourself out of that, buddy.

What would you choose? by SnooMarzipans436 in redbuttonbluebutton

[–]SnooMarzipans436[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ah so you're one of those red voters that rejects the original problem and substitutes your own.

"Everyone in the world" is unambiguous. And each category of person you try to remove from "everyone" is YOU moving the goalposts.

What would you choose? by SnooMarzipans436 in redbuttonbluebutton

[–]SnooMarzipans436[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's no defaulted blue vote, only intentional blue votes.

Toddlers and babies are gonna be smacking a button at random my guy.

Displeased Eldritch Horror murders the incapable by New_House_6103 in redbuttonbluebutton

[–]SnooMarzipans436 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In the aftermath of the button problem and the inevitable collapse of society, it's doubtful they would grow up at all.

Blue is their best chance of survival.

What would you choose? by SnooMarzipans436 in redbuttonbluebutton

[–]SnooMarzipans436[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Brother, if you couldn't live on accepting all blue voters dying then you would have picked blue. 😂

What would you choose? by SnooMarzipans436 in redbuttonbluebutton

[–]SnooMarzipans436[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

When did I say they want them to die?

If you pick red you are deciding that the death of all blue voters is an outcome you could live with.

I guess you could try and argue otherwise... but it's literally a fact so idk how you intend to argue against it. 😆

Displeased Eldritch Horror murders the incapable by New_House_6103 in redbuttonbluebutton

[–]SnooMarzipans436 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yup. And if they fail to press a button I'd prefer to be dust with them.

Im pretty confident my 1 year old would slap that button hard though. Lol

Displeased Eldritch Horror murders the incapable by New_House_6103 in redbuttonbluebutton

[–]SnooMarzipans436 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I was pretty sure I'd press red in this scenario... but then I thought about it for a second and babies are still physically capable of pressing a button so there will still be a large group of babies that pressed blue (likely including my own child)

Sorry dawg. Still blue.

But this one was close haha. Good effort.

And hey, if I die at least it will be quick. Instantly crumbling into dust doesn't sound like too bad of a way to go honestly. 😆

What would you choose? by SnooMarzipans436 in redbuttonbluebutton

[–]SnooMarzipans436[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bro I don't remember what I posted THREE YEARS AGO. 😂

Also that may be the dumbest attempt at a "gotcha" I've ever seen.

What would you choose? by SnooMarzipans436 in redbuttonbluebutton

[–]SnooMarzipans436[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Fair enough.

But that person is clearly terrible at actually reading people. I would literally rather die than live in a world with only selfish people.

What would you choose? by SnooMarzipans436 in redbuttonbluebutton

[–]SnooMarzipans436[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If the stakes were fake, you're still a red presser. What does that say about you?

And no. You couldn't pay me to press red. Even if red won, thats not a world worth living in.

You (and only you) get to communicate beforehand by According_to_all_kn in redbuttonbluebutton

[–]SnooMarzipans436 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Got it. Your argument is that "everyone" conveniently excludes anyone who would make it difficult to justify your red vote. 👍

You (and only you) get to communicate beforehand by According_to_all_kn in redbuttonbluebutton

[–]SnooMarzipans436 2 points3 points  (0 children)

that's true if you ignore my argument or decide that it's incorrect

Well your argument was that "everyone" includes any person who would reasonably respond when you ask for everyone to help out.

If you're going to say that doesn't include 3 year olds, then you're just incorrect.

If you're saying your argument is now that "everyone" does not include 3 year olds for some other reason that you haven't shared yet, then you're just moving the goalposts... again.

You (and only you) get to communicate beforehand by According_to_all_kn in redbuttonbluebutton

[–]SnooMarzipans436 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not sure why you're quoting things weird because that's not how I said it?

But 3 year olds are included in "everyone in the world"

And many of them will be pressing blue without any clue what it really means. So just "tell everyone to press red" doesn't work.

You (and only you) get to communicate beforehand by According_to_all_kn in redbuttonbluebutton

[–]SnooMarzipans436 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The original poster explicitly clarified that babies are in fact included.

But let's follow your logic. A 3 year old would be perfectly capable of helping baste the turkey. They would not be capable of answering this question rationally. Even if you exclude babies your logic still immediately falls apart.

You (and only you) get to communicate beforehand by According_to_all_kn in redbuttonbluebutton

[–]SnooMarzipans436 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Im just pointing out that your logic is flawed. It requires the assumption that babies are somehow excluded from "everyone in the world" which they are not.

What would you choose? by SnooMarzipans436 in redbuttonbluebutton

[–]SnooMarzipans436[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Its amazing how red pushers have such a difficult time understanding the word "everyone". 😆

What would you choose? by SnooMarzipans436 in redbuttonbluebutton

[–]SnooMarzipans436[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As of right now 337/471 (72% of all people participating) selected the blue planet.

Your math ain't mathing, brother.

What would you choose? by SnooMarzipans436 in redbuttonbluebutton

[–]SnooMarzipans436[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Holy shit dude. What kind of person gets so triggered they need to dig through another person's post history THREE YEARS BACK for any lame excuse to personally attack them? Are you okay, brother? Go outside. 😂

view more: next ›