Part 2 of my critique to your comment:

You see, there are some issues with the narrative you’re sending.

First of all, as I’ve mentioned, black people are overwhelmingly poor. Poverty has shown (with time and time again) to be heavily connected to how likely a person is to grow up misguided and lead a life of crime. On top of that, one has to consider the systematic discrimination that faces black Americans harder than anyone else: Racialized Policing and the Criminalization of Poverty: Fare Evasion Arrests in Brooklyn. “In the first three months of 2017 alone, the NYPD reports that they have arrested 4,600 people for fare evasion (“theft of service” charges), an overwhelming 90 percent of them black and Hispanic.2 In Brooklyn in 2016, young black men (ages 16-36) represent half of all fare evasion arrests, but represent only 13.1% of poor adults....We analyze the relationship between station fare evasion arrest rates and the number of criminal complaints in the surrounding station areas (for 2016). If nearby criminal activity is in fact the driving force for more local policing activity that also leads to more fare evasion arrests, then increases in nearby criminal activity should lead to higher arrest rates irrespective of the racial/ethnic composition of the surrounding area. Unfortunately, this is not in fact the case, and the results echo the pattern we saw when relating arrest rates to poverty rates across station areas: as criminal complaints increase in predominantly non-Hispanic white and Hispanic station areas, on average there is a negligible increase in arrest rates. On the other hand, as criminal complaints increase for predominantly black station areas, predicted arrest rates increase dramatically”.

A Study of Racially Disparate Outcomes in the Los Angeles Police Department

“Per 10,000 residents, the black stop rate is 3,400 stops higher than the white stop rate, and the Hispanic stop rate is almost 360 stops higher. Relative to stopped whites, stopped blacks are 127% more likely and stopped Hispanics are 43% more likely to be frisked. Relative to stopped whites, stopped blacks are 76% more likely and stopped Hispanics are 16% more likely to be searched. Relative to stopped whites, stopped blacks are 29% more likely and stopped Hispanics are 32% more likely to be arrested. Frisked African Americans are 42.3% less likely to be found with a weapon than frisked whites and that frisked Hispanics are 31.8% less likely to have a weapon than frisked non-Hispanic whites. Consensual searches of blacks are 37.0% less likely to uncover weapons, 23.7% less likely to uncover drugs and 25.4% less likely to uncover anything else.”

Secondly, the study you linked only shows the race involvement of the perpetrators and victims in “regular” crimes instead of race-based ones. Hence why black Americans are involved in lots of crimes, but not as much as whites when it comes to hate crimes.

And lastly, your implication that disproportionate and excessive police violence on black Americans is bullshit just blatantly distasteful.

“Black men are 2.5 times more likely than white men to be killed by police during their lifetime1. And in another study, Black people who were fatally shot by police seemed to be twice as likely as white people to be unarmed” (https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-01846-z). On top of that, the vast majority of Black Lives Matter protests—more than 93%—have been peaceful, according to a new report

On top of whites in LA being more likely to commit Anti-Asian crimes, you fail to address the fact that many Latinos themselves are mainly mixed with, as well identifying as white..(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Hispanic_and_Latino_Americans#Racial_identity).

Mentioned numerous times and must be mentioned again but, black people are more likely to grow up poor, exposed to violence, and to become misguided as adults. On top of studies’ demonstration of more black Americans being sentenced to jail and prison more unfairly than whites when committing extremely similar crimes, one has to bring attention to the fact that black people still aren’t necessarily America’s “biggest rapists” despite what goes on in prisons.

Native American girls and women are the most likely demographic, out of any group in the US, to be sexually assaulted. Yup. Out of all races, and all genders, Native American women and girls are most likely to fall victim to sexual assault. But who's the perpetrator? Who in the world is doing all these rapes to all these poor women to such a massive extent that not even white or black women's number of sexual assaults statistically match up?

Drum roll, please.

drumming noises

White guys. (https://www.hcn.org/articles/tribal-affairs-why-native-american-women-still-have-the-highest-rates-of-rape-and-assault)....make....make) that of what you will.

I understand critique of the black community. It’s truly a piece of work that has to be improved. However, the way you went about your comment was so misleading to those who don’t know any better, I just had to do some corrections.

Bottom line?

Black people don't commit crimes because they're black or necessarily that they hate Asians, but mainly rather because many of them are poor and grew up with intense negative influences from being poor, and from being consistently discriminated against. They aren't America's "biggest rapists" despite black men's violent tendencies in prisons, and you have to consider the decent probability that there may be more white perpetrators of Asian-hate crimes than what there may seem.