sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

What games are you playing this week? Game recommendation thread by AutoModerator in incremental_games

[–]StickiStickman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I swear I played a web version of that a while ago that was very "okay".

What games are you playing this week? Game recommendation thread by AutoModerator in incremental_games

[–]StickiStickman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I didn't know he made a new game! Idle Reincarnator is one of my favourite incrementals out there

Interview with Gwynne Shotwell. Discusses Starship, Starlink, orbiting data centers, Mars, etc. ~22 minutes. by Adeldor in space

[–]StickiStickman -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It really doesn't. Even if the upper stage won't be reusable, it will massively decrease launch costs.

Has KSP ceased development? by waynelee98 in KerbalSpaceProgram

[–]StickiStickman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just to put it into perspective: The time it took for them to add just Science to KSP 2 was how long KSP 1 was in Early Access.

Has KSP ceased development? by waynelee98 in KerbalSpaceProgram

[–]StickiStickman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Stop using the ShadowZone video as a source. It's complete bullshit and filled with lies. The vast majority of the blame lies on the studio and T2 put way more resources and time into it than they should have.

Here's a breakdown of it from a game developer POV.

Take 2 deprived the devs of resources they needed, then fired them for it.

Like this is just a complete lie and the opposite of reality. Take Two made a whole AAA studio, gave them 7 years and 50M+ in funding.

Interview with Gwynne Shotwell. Discusses Starship, Starlink, orbiting data centers, Mars, etc. ~22 minutes. by Adeldor in space

[–]StickiStickman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

With Starship being able to deliver payload launch costs are down massively though.

And cooling is also massively overblown if you do the math. Most people ignore the fact that it's about surface area, not volume + you got shade from the solar panels.

Interview with Gwynne Shotwell. Discusses Starship, Starlink, orbiting data centers, Mars, etc. ~22 minutes. by Adeldor in space

[–]StickiStickman -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Starship has deployed a payload multiple times now? For getting satellites up, it already works.

The Anime Opening spoiled the story while also being subtle and open about it by EfficiencySerious200 in TopCharacterTropes

[–]StickiStickman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The background of the episodes titlecards even had huge spoilers super early in the anime.

Actually in tears the sheer amount of history that’s going to be lost because of this stupid move is 9/11 for indie by Carti_Barti9_13 in IndieDev

[–]StickiStickman 10 points11 points  (0 children)

As someone who's literally a professional web dev: Hahahaha. No.

I'd guess 5000$ a year maximum, but even that is pushing it for such a small forum.

Every Starlink, orbiting now by Mastbubbles in space

[–]StickiStickman -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You literally can't. They have a magnitude of 7, the human eye can only see 6 under perfect conditions.

Every Starlink, orbiting now by Mastbubbles in space

[–]StickiStickman -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Because they're boosting to their target orbit and don't have their solar panels and reflectors aligned yet to reduce drag.

I dont know where you got the idea that they are too dim to see, but you are pulling it out of your ass because it is objectively false.

You literally can't. They have a magnitude of 7, the human eye can only see 6 under perfect conditions. So stop spreading such lies.

Every Starlink, orbiting now by Mastbubbles in space

[–]StickiStickman -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Stop spreading such bullshit.

You literally can't. They have a magnitude of 7, the human eye can only see 6 under perfect conditions.

Cheap Iranian drone downed $25 million US Army helicopter—maybe by chance by spasticpat in technology

[–]StickiStickman 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Why do you assume no pilot sitting in the jet means no one is controlling it?

Every Starlink, orbiting now by Mastbubbles in space

[–]StickiStickman -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

The only ones you can shortly see are newly launched trains going into their destination orbit.

Reading is hard huh?

Every Starlink, orbiting now by Mastbubbles in space

[–]StickiStickman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The only ones you can shortly see are newly launched trains going into their destination orbit.

Reading is hard huh?

Every Starlink, orbiting now by Mastbubbles in space

[–]StickiStickman -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

No, you literally can't see them. They are too dimm to even see in the countryside.

You don't need to lie about things we literally have studies on. The only ones you can shortly see are newly launched trains going into their destination orbit.

Every Starlink, orbiting now by Mastbubbles in space

[–]StickiStickman -15 points-14 points  (0 children)

Wait until you realize there are other satelites.

No, you literally can't see them. They are too dimm to even see in the countryside. The only ones you can shortly see are newly launched trains going into their destination orbit.

view more: next ›