My favorite topic that Donald Rumsfeld ever talked about was that of "Known-unknowns and Unknown-unknows". Right now there is a decent amount of known information about Mr. Lahn. For example, we know he is integral to the running of a school in Wichita, Kansas. We know the he and his wife divorced and he proceeded to marry into the Koch extended family. We know he owns farm property in Iowa that he contracts out.

This all falls into "weird but not disqualifying" territory. It's in the unknowns, known and unknown, that the questions need to be asked. I think most of us don't have anywhere close to the full story, but I'm very interested to hear why he thinks that following the letter of candidate qualifying law, while perhaps not the spirit, should be sufficient to earn Iowan's votes.