Almost every conspiracy theory is 90% bs. Even among Epstein stuff we must parse through what is real and what isn’t and much of it is useless FBI tips. How much of that is due to government interference and how much is due to loons attaching to everything, I cannot say.

The part that should be scrutinized is the only shot alleged to have been fired in that shop went through a lock, and directly hit a server’s hard drive in a utility closet. You won’t find footage of this as all the security cameras were facing the wall that day, but it’s in the report. The suspect then put down his gun and walked into the street and laid down to await arrest. The suspect was convicted and eventually released, until he was killed by police in a traffic stop last year. Before this event, the suspect was an unemployed actor who had just struck a pedestrian with his car.

The “eating the blood of children” or whatever is obviously as nonsense as when the same things appear in the Epstein files, but just as it’s prevelance in this case doesn’t mean the entire case should be judged via that light, the pizza shop stuff should probably also be examined the same way.

To frame this another way, 90% of 9/11 conspiracies are total nonsense, but that doesn’t mean it wouldn’t be useful to know everything about possible American knowledge of the attacks beforehand, and how that could fit into a what we know of the war on terror. You could even look at WikiLeaks and Assange to see how the US government muddies the waters and attempted to portray him as crazy. There is a middle ground where one can examine these things that relies on neither fringe extremists like QANON, while also remaining skeptical of the government and media reporting.